Easterbrook P J
Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, England.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol. 1998;17 Suppl 1:S28-33. doi: 10.1097/00042560-199801001-00009.
This article summarizes the various problems and pitfalls in using clinical databases for epidemiologic research, with particular reference to an HIV clinical database. The combined population of HIV-infected individuals attending the Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, the Charing Cross Hospital, and the Victoria Clinic in London is the largest cohort of HIV-positive individuals in the U.K. A computerized database was developed in the mid-1980s and was adapted into a clinically oriented observational database for approximately 6,653 HIV-1-positive registered patients from three hospital-based clinics within the Riverside Health Authority in London, U.K.: Chelsea and Westminster Hospital Clinic (n = 5,000); Charing Cross Hospital (n = 500); and the Victoria Clinic (n = 500). The majority (83%) of HIV-infected patients registered at these sites are homosexual or bisexual men. Of 2,078 patients seen within the last 6 months, 22% are asymptomatic and 33% have AIDS; 30% have a CD4 cell count of less than 100 cells/mm3 and 17% have a CD4 cell count of greater than 500 cells/mm3. Dates of seroconversion are known for approximately 285 patients. For each patient, information on demographic characteristics, clinical symptoms, and HIV-related diagnoses, outpatient pharmacy prescriptions, day care treatments and procedures, and enrollment into clinical trials is routinely collected at outpatient clinic visits and entered into the database. Inpatient diagnoses and treatments were integrated into the database in September 1995. Unused serum samples from routine AIDS antibody or antigen testing are stored in a local specimen repository. The main purpose of the HIV database is to provide a multipurpose resource for use by physicians, researchers, and managers for administration, clinical care, and research. The specific functions of the database are the following: to enhance patient management by providing access to a clinical summary sheet detailing up-to-date information; to serve as a research tool for clinical and epidemiologic research; to aid in the identification of patients eligible for planned or ongoing clinical trials; to provide a facility for local and regional AIDS surveillance and reporting; and to provide a facility for administration and resource management of HIV services. The major limitations of this database in the conduct of clinical research have been losses to follow-up and incomplete information about clinical outcomes, because physicians have failed to update the clinical information.
本文总结了在利用临床数据库进行流行病学研究时存在的各种问题和缺陷,特别提及了一个艾滋病毒临床数据库。在英国伦敦,切尔西和威斯敏斯特医院、查令十字医院以及维多利亚诊所接待的感染艾滋病毒的个体总数,构成了英国最大的艾滋病毒阳性人群队列。20世纪80年代中期开发了一个计算机化数据库,该数据库被改编为一个以临床为导向的观察性数据库,纳入了英国伦敦河畔卫生管理局下属三家医院诊所的约6653名艾滋病毒-1阳性登记患者:切尔西和威斯敏斯特医院诊所(5000例);查令十字医院(500例);以及维多利亚诊所(500例)。在这些地点登记的感染艾滋病毒患者中,大多数(83%)是男同性恋者或双性恋者。在过去6个月内就诊的2078名患者中,22%无症状,33%患有艾滋病;30%的患者CD4细胞计数低于100个细胞/立方毫米,17%的患者CD4细胞计数高于500个细胞/立方毫米。约285名患者的血清转化日期已知。对于每位患者,在门诊就诊时会定期收集其人口统计学特征、临床症状、艾滋病毒相关诊断、门诊药房处方、日间护理治疗和程序以及参与临床试验等信息,并录入数据库。住院诊断和治疗信息于1995年9月整合到数据库中。常规艾滋病抗体或抗原检测中未使用的血清样本存储在当地的标本库中。艾滋病毒数据库的主要目的是为医生、研究人员和管理人员提供一个多用途资源,用于管理、临床护理和研究。该数据库的具体功能如下:通过提供详细的最新信息临床摘要表来加强患者管理;作为临床和流行病学研究的工具;协助确定符合计划中或正在进行的临床试验条件的患者;为当地和地区的艾滋病监测和报告提供便利;以及为艾滋病毒服务的管理和资源管理提供便利。该数据库在进行临床研究时的主要局限性在于随访失访以及临床结果信息不完整,原因是医生未能更新临床信息。