Wolcott J, Himel V T, Powell W, Penney J
Division of Endodontics, University of Tennessee, College of Dentistry, Memphis 38163, USA.
J Endod. 1997 Oct;23(10):632-5. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(97)80176-8.
The three-dimensional obturation of the root canal system is widely accepted as a key factor for successful endodontic therapy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the obturation of lateral canals and the main canal using cold lateral condensation versus the gutta-percha coated rigid carrier. Thirty epoxy blocks with five lateral canals placed at varying angles from the main canal were used. Each experimental group was obturated by a board certified endodontist with clinical experience in the respective obturation technique. The length of gutta-percha and sealer in the lateral canals was measured under a microscope (x30, Unitron) to the nearest 0.5 mm. The blocks were sectioned with an Isomet Plus precision saw (Buehler, Lake Bluff, IL) and copious water irrigation perpendicular to the main canal at the apex, the height of contour, and at 0.8, 1.6 and 2.4 mm from the canal apex. A microscope (x100, Leitz, Switzerland) was used to determine voids. There was significantly (p < .001) more gutta-percha in the lateral canals with the gutta-percha coated rigid carrier technique. In contrast, the cold lateral condensation technique had significantly (p < .001) more sealer in the lateral canals. However, there was no significant (p < .05) difference, in gutta-percha-plus-sealer filling of the lateral canals, between the two techniques. In the apical 1 mm of the main canal there were significantly (p < .011) fewer voids with the gutta-percha coated rigid carrier technique compared to the cold lateral condensation. In the model chosen, the gutta-percha coated rigid carrier technique and the cold lateral condensation technique were equally effective in filling lateral canals. In filling the main canal, however, the coated rigid carrier technique was more effective.
根管系统的三维充填被广泛认为是牙髓治疗成功的关键因素。本研究的目的是评估使用冷侧向加压充填法与牙胶涂层硬质载体法对侧支根管和主根管的充填情况。使用了30个环氧树脂块,每个块中有5个与主根管呈不同角度的侧支根管。每个实验组由一名在各自充填技术方面有临床经验的获得委员会认证的牙髓病医生进行充填。在显微镜(Unitron,30倍)下测量侧支根管中牙胶和封闭剂的长度,精确到最接近的0.5毫米。用Isomet Plus精密锯(Buehler,伊利诺伊州莱克布拉夫)将环氧树脂块切片,并在根尖、外形高点以及距根管根尖0.8、1.6和2.4毫米处垂直于主根管大量注水冲洗。使用显微镜(瑞士徕卡,100倍)确定空隙情况。采用牙胶涂层硬质载体技术时,侧支根管中的牙胶明显更多(p <.001)。相比之下,冷侧向加压充填技术在侧支根管中的封闭剂明显更多(p <.001)。然而,在侧支根管的牙胶加封闭剂充填方面,两种技术之间没有显著差异(p <.05)。在主根管根尖1毫米处,与冷侧向加压充填法相比,牙胶涂层硬质载体技术的空隙明显更少(p <.011)。在所选模型中,牙胶涂层硬质载体技术和冷侧向加压充填技术在充填侧支根管方面同样有效。然而,在充填主根管时,涂层硬质载体技术更有效。