Suppr超能文献

五种根管预备技术清理根管根尖三分之一处效果的组织学评估

Histological evaluation of the effectiveness of five instrumentation techniques for cleaning the apical third of root canals.

作者信息

Siqueira J F, Araújo M C, Garcia P F, Fraga R C, Dantas C J

机构信息

Gama Filho School of Dentistry, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

出版信息

J Endod. 1997 Aug;23(8):499-502. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(97)80309-3.

Abstract

The efficacy of five instrumentation techniques for cleaning the apical third of curved root canals was assessed by histological examination. Mesial root canals of freshly extracted human mandibular molars were prepared by the following instrumentation methods: step-back technique using stainless steel files; step-back technique using nickel-titanium files; ultrasonic technique; balanced force technique; and Canal Master U technique and instruments. The apical portion of the root was histologically processed, and cross-sections were examined for remaining soft tissue, predentin, and debris. The results showed no significant differences among the techniques. Although the five instrumentation methods were effective in removal of major amounts of tissue from the canals, none totally debrided the entire root canal system, especially when variations in the internal anatomy were present.

摘要

通过组织学检查评估了五种根管预备技术清理弯曲根管根尖三分之一的效果。采用以下根管预备方法对新鲜拔除的人下颌磨牙近中根管进行预备:使用不锈钢锉的逐步后退技术;使用镍钛锉的逐步后退技术;超声技术;平衡力技术;以及根管大师U技术及器械。对牙根根尖部分进行组织学处理,并对横断面检查剩余软组织、前期牙本质和碎屑。结果显示各技术之间无显著差异。虽然这五种根管预备方法能有效去除根管内的大量组织,但没有一种能完全清理整个根管系统,尤其是存在内部解剖结构变异时。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验