Dahm S L, Steptoe P, Luttropp H H, Reinstrup P
Department of Anaesthesia, University Hospital of Lund, Sweden.
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1998 Mar;15(2):230-3.
The isoflurane-saving and CO2-retaining effects of a charcoal filter were compared with a Siemens standard heat and moisture (HME) exchanger and an emptied specimen (dummy). Isoflurane was delivered during the inspiratory phase and consumption investigated at 10, 15 and 25 cycles min-1. The investigation was performed by ventilation with humidified air with a constant end-tidal CO2 and temperature. For a comparison, isoflurane was delivered in a conventional manner via the ventilator. The arrangement with a charcoal filter reduced the isoflurane consumption by a factor of 2.0-2.6, depending on ventilatory rate. Most of the saving was a result of the method of isoflurane delivery (factor 1.4-2.0), while adding the reflector gave a further reduction (factor 1.3-1.5). One circumstance that reduced the net efficiency of the charcoal filter was that it also reflected CO2; consequently, total minute ventilation had to be increased to maintain constant end-tidal CO2.
将活性炭过滤器的异氟烷节省和二氧化碳潴留效应与西门子标准的热湿交换器(HME)及空样本(假人)进行了比较。在吸气阶段输送异氟烷,并在每分钟10、15和25次循环时研究其消耗量。研究通过用具有恒定呼气末二氧化碳和温度的湿化空气进行通气来进行。为作比较,异氟烷以常规方式通过呼吸机输送。带有活性炭过滤器的装置可将异氟烷消耗量降低2.0至2.6倍,具体取决于通气速率。大部分节省是异氟烷输送方式的结果(1.4至2.0倍),而添加反射器可进一步降低(1.3至1.5倍)。降低活性炭过滤器净效率的一个情况是它也会反射二氧化碳;因此,必须增加每分钟通气总量以维持恒定的呼气末二氧化碳。