Calvillo O, Esses S I, Ponder C, D'Agostino C, Tanhui E
Department of Anesthesiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998 May 1;23(9):1069-72. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199805010-00022.
A report of two cases of severe sacroiliac pain that were resistant to conventional management techniques. Both patients had undergone lumbar fusion. This appeared to be a predisposing factor.
To define the source of pain in these patients by performing a series of diagnostic blocks under fluoroscopic guidance to determine if these patients were candidates for neuroaugmentation.
Mild to moderate sacroiliac joint pain can be managed conservatively with analgesics, anti-inflammatory drugs, and physical therapy. Severe sacroiliac joint pain can be incapacitating and more challenging to manage. Fluoroscopically guided intra-articular local anesthetic-steroid injections, followed by joint manipulation, can be effective, intracapsular injections of glycerin, glucose, and phenol also may be beneficial in some patients. The use of neuroaugmentation to manage pain of synovial origin has not been reported previously. Sacral nerve root stimulation in particular has been used to manage urinary bladder dysfunction and pain, but not sacroiliac joint pain.
Two patients with severe sacroiliac joint pain were treated by implanting a neuroprosthesis at the third sacral nerve roots. The patients had undergone lumbar fusion for back pain that developed as a result of work-related injuries. Stimulation was tried for 1 week with bilateral, percutaneously implanted, cardiac pacing wires at the third sacral nerve roots.
Both patients experienced relief of approximately 60% of their pain during the trial period. Therefore, a neuroprosthesis (Medtronics, MN) was implanted permanently bilaterally at the third sacral nerve root in both patients. The use of analgesics was reportedly the same after implantation, but significantly more effective, and the patients' daily living activities were more tolerable.
Two cases of refractory sacroiliac joint pain are reported that were managed with permanently implanted neuroprostheses at the third sacral nerve roots. The authors suggest that neuroaugmentation can be a reasonable option in selected patients with refractory sacroiliac pain.
报告两例对传统治疗方法无效的严重骶髂关节疼痛病例。两名患者均接受过腰椎融合术。这似乎是一个诱发因素。
通过在透视引导下进行一系列诊断性阻滞,确定这些患者的疼痛来源,以判断这些患者是否适合进行神经增强治疗。
轻至中度骶髂关节疼痛可通过使用镇痛药、抗炎药和物理治疗进行保守治疗。严重的骶髂关节疼痛可能使人丧失能力,治疗起来更具挑战性。透视引导下关节内局部麻醉药 - 类固醇注射,随后进行关节手法治疗可能有效,囊内注射甘油、葡萄糖和苯酚在一些患者中也可能有益。此前尚未有使用神经增强治疗滑膜源性疼痛的报道。特别是骶神经根刺激已被用于治疗膀胱功能障碍和疼痛,但未用于骶髂关节疼痛。
两名严重骶髂关节疼痛患者通过在第三骶神经根植入神经假体进行治疗。这两名患者因工伤导致背痛而接受了腰椎融合术。尝试使用经皮双侧植入第三骶神经根的心脏起搏导线进行为期1周的刺激。
两名患者在试验期内疼痛均减轻了约60%。因此,两名患者均在双侧第三骶神经根永久植入了神经假体(美敦力公司,明尼苏达州)。据报道,植入后镇痛药的使用情况相同,但效果显著更好,患者的日常生活活动更易于耐受。
报告了两例难治性骶髂关节疼痛病例,通过在第三骶神经根永久植入神经假体进行治疗。作者认为,对于某些难治性骶髂关节疼痛患者,神经增强可能是一种合理的选择。