• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

舒普深治疗外科感染的随机对照临床试验

[A randomized controlled clinical trial of sulperazon in the treatment of surgical infection].

作者信息

Tian Y, Zheng X, Xu Y

机构信息

Department of Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang.

出版信息

Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 1996 Dec;34(12):740-3.

PMID:9590776
Abstract

Randomized controlled clinical study of Sulperazon (Sulbactam/Cefoperazon) was made in the surgical field. 35 cases were treated with Sulperazon and 32 cases with Ceftazidime. In the Sulperazon group (35 patients), the effective rate was 88.6% as compared with 90.6% of the patients in the Ceftazidime group (32 patients) (P > 0.05). The bacterial eradication rate was 86.2% in the Sulperazon group as compared with 88.5% in the Ceftazidime group. No significant difference was noted in both groups. In the Sulperazon group, side effects were not observed except nausea in one case.

摘要

对舒普深(舒巴坦/头孢哌酮)进行了外科领域的随机对照临床研究。35例患者接受舒普深治疗,32例患者接受头孢他啶治疗。舒普深组(35例患者)有效率为88.6%,头孢他啶组(32例患者)有效率为90.6%(P>0.05)。舒普深组细菌清除率为86.2%,头孢他啶组为88.5%。两组均未观察到显著差异。在舒普深组,除1例出现恶心外,未观察到副作用。

相似文献

1
[A randomized controlled clinical trial of sulperazon in the treatment of surgical infection].舒普深治疗外科感染的随机对照临床试验
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 1996 Dec;34(12):740-3.
2
[Comparison of efficacy between ceftriaxone and cefoperazone plus sulbactam in peri-operative treatment of acute suppurative cholangitis].头孢曲松与头孢哌酮舒巴坦在急性化脓性胆管炎围手术期治疗中的疗效比较
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2004 Nov 17;84(22):1879-82.
3
[Modern possibilities of hepacef combi (cefoperazon/sulbactam) application for the treatment of surgical infection].
Klin Khir. 2011 Feb(2):65-9.
4
Randomized, double-blind, controlled study of cefoperazone-sulbactam plus cotrimoxazole versus ceftazidime plus cotrimoxazole for the treatment of severe melioidosis.头孢哌酮-舒巴坦联合复方磺胺甲恶唑与头孢他啶联合复方磺胺甲恶唑治疗重症类鼻疽的随机、双盲、对照研究
Clin Infect Dis. 2001 Jul 1;33(1):29-34. doi: 10.1086/320878. Epub 2001 May 23.
5
Cefoperazone/sulbactam + co-trimoxazole vs ceftazidime + co-trimoxazole in the treatment of severe melioidosis: a randomized, double-blind, controlled study.头孢哌酮/舒巴坦+复方磺胺甲恶唑与头孢他啶+复方磺胺甲恶唑治疗重症类鼻疽的随机双盲对照研究
J Med Assoc Thai. 1998 Apr;81(4):265-71.
6
Bioequivalence study of the two 1.5 g cefoperazone and sulbactam IM injections in Thai healthy male volunteers.
J Med Assoc Thai. 2008 Nov;91(11):1760-4.
7
[Antibacterial activity in vitro and clinical use of sulperazon].
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 1997 Jun;36(6):406-10.
8
Cefoperazone-sulbactam for treatment of intra-abdominal infections: results from a randomized, parallel group study in India.头孢哌酮-舒巴坦治疗腹腔内感染:印度一项随机平行组研究的结果
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2008 Jun;9(3):367-76. doi: 10.1089/sur.2007.013.
9
In vitro activity of sulperazon against recent isolates of ceftazidime-resistant bacteria.舒普深对近期分离的头孢他啶耐药菌的体外活性。
Med J Malaysia. 2001 Sep;56(3):365-9.
10
[Use of sulperazone in acute surgical conditions].
Bratisl Lek Listy. 1999 Dec;100(12):709-11.