Chan R W, Titze I R
Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology, National Center for Voice and Speech, The University of Iowa, Iowa City 52242, USA.
Laryngoscope. 1998 May;108(5):725-31. doi: 10.1097/00005537-199805000-00019.
Vocal fold vibration depends critically on the viscoelasticity of vocal fold tissues. For instance, phonation threshold pressure, a measure of the "ease" of phonation, has been shown to be directly related to the viscosity of the vibrating mucosa. Various implantable biomaterials have been used in vocal fold augmentation surgery, with implantation sites sometimes close to or inside the mucosa. Yet their viscosities or other mechanical properties are seldom known. This study attempts to provide data on viscosities of commonly used phonosurgical biomaterials. Using a parallel-plate rotational rheometer, oscillatory shear experiments were performed on implantable polytetrafluoroethylene (Teflon or Polytef; Mentor Inc., Hingham, MA), collagen (Zyderm; Collagen Corp., Palo Alto, CA), glutaraldehyde crosslinked (GAX) collagen (Phonagel or Zyplast; Collagen Corp.), absorbable gelatin (Gelfoam; Upjohn Co., Kalamazoo, MI), and human abdominal subcutaneous fat. Samples of human vocal fold mucosal tissues were also tested. Under sinusoidal oscillatory shear at 10 Hz and at 37 degrees C, the dynamic viscosity was 116 Pascal-seconds (Pa-s) for polytetrafluoroethylene, 21 Pa-s for gelatin, 8-13 Pa-s for the two types of collagen, 3 Pa-s for fat, and 1 to 3 Pa-s for vocal fold mucosa. Results extrapolated to 100 Hz also show similar differences among the biomaterials, but all values are an order of magnitude lower because of the typical inverse frequency relation (shear thinning effect) for polymeric and biologic materials. The data suggest that the use of fat for vocal fold augmentation may be more conducive to the "ease" of phonation because of its relatively low viscosity, which is closest to physiologic levels. This implication is probably the most relevant in predicting initial outcome of the postoperative voice before there is any significant assimilation (e.g., resorption and fibrosis) of the implanted biomaterial.
声带振动关键取决于声带组织的粘弹性。例如,发声阈压力是衡量发声“难易程度”的指标,已被证明与振动黏膜的粘性直接相关。各种可植入生物材料已用于声带增强手术,植入部位有时靠近黏膜或在黏膜内部。然而,它们的粘性或其他机械性能却鲜为人知。本研究试图提供常用嗓音外科生物材料粘性的数据。使用平行板旋转流变仪,对可植入的聚四氟乙烯(特氟龙或聚四氟乙烯;美敦力公司,欣厄姆,马萨诸塞州)、胶原蛋白(Zy derm;胶原蛋白公司,帕洛阿尔托,加利福尼亚州)、戊二醛交联(GAX)胶原蛋白(Phonagel或Zyplast;胶原蛋白公司)、可吸收明胶(Gelfoam;优普强公司,卡拉马祖,密歇根州)和人腹部皮下脂肪进行了振荡剪切实验。还对人声带黏膜组织样本进行了测试。在10赫兹和37摄氏度的正弦振荡剪切下,聚四氟乙烯的动态粘度为116帕斯卡秒(Pa - s),明胶为21 Pa - s,两种胶原蛋白为8 - 13 Pa - s,脂肪为3 Pa - s,声带黏膜为1至3 Pa - s。外推至100赫兹的结果也显示生物材料之间存在类似差异,但由于聚合物和生物材料典型的反频率关系(剪切变稀效应),所有值都低一个数量级。数据表明,由于脂肪粘度相对较低,最接近生理水平,用于声带增强可能更有利于发声“轻松”。这一含义在预测术后声音的初始结果方面可能最为相关,此时植入的生物材料尚未发生任何显著的同化(例如,吸收和纤维化)。