Gnann J W, Crumpacker C S, Lalezari J P, Smith J A, Tyring S K, Baum K F, Borucki M J, Joseph W P, Mertz G J, Steigbigel R T, Cloud G A, Soong S J, Sherrill L C, DeHertogh D A, Whitley R J
Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 35294-2170, USA.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998 May;42(5):1139-45. doi: 10.1128/AAC.42.5.1139.
The present randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter clinical trial was designed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of sorivudine [1-beta-D-arabinofuranosyl-E-(2-bromovinyl)uracil] and acyclovir for the treatment of dermatomal herpes zoster in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-seropositive patients. A total of 170 HIV-seropositive adults presenting with herpes zoster (confirmed by direct fluorescent-antigen testing and/or viral culture) were enrolled and randomized to receive a 10-day course of orally administered sorivudine (40 mg once daily plus acyclovir placebos) or acyclovir (800 mg five times daily plus sorivudine placebo). Patients were monitored daily to document the events of cutaneous healing, pain, zoster-related complications, and drug-related adverse events. Patients were reassessed on days 21 and 28 and then once monthly for 1 year. The primary efficacy endpoint was time to the cessation of new vesicle formation. Secondary efficacy endpoints included times to other events of cutaneous healing, resolution of pain, and frequency of dissemination and zoster recurrence. In a multivariate analysis, sorivudine was superior to acyclovir for reducing the times to the cessation of new vesicle formation (relative risk [RR] = 1.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.00 to 2.36; P = 0.049) and total lesion crusting (RR = 1.48, 95% CI = 1.07 to 2.04; P = 0.017). In a univariate analysis, there was a trend favoring sorivudine for the cessation of new vesicle formation (median of 3 versus 4 days; P = 0.07) and a significant advantage for time to total lesion crusting (median of 7 versus 8 days; P = 0.02). The time to the resolution of zoster-associated pain, the frequency of dissemination, and the frequency of zoster recurrence were not different between the two treatment groups. Both drugs were well tolerated. Sorivudine is an effective drug for the treatment of herpes zoster in HIV-infected patients and results in accelerated cutaneous healing when compared with acyclovir therapy.
本随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、多中心临床试验旨在比较索立夫定[1-β-D-阿拉伯呋喃糖基-E-(2-溴乙烯基)尿嘧啶]与阿昔洛韦治疗人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)血清学阳性患者带状疱疹的疗效和耐受性。共有170名出现带状疱疹(经直接荧光抗原检测和/或病毒培养确诊)的HIV血清学阳性成人入组,并随机接受为期10天的口服索立夫定疗程(每日一次40毫克加阿昔洛韦安慰剂)或阿昔洛韦(每日五次800毫克加索立夫定安慰剂)。每天对患者进行监测,记录皮肤愈合、疼痛、带状疱疹相关并发症及药物相关不良事件的发生情况。在第21天和第28天对患者进行重新评估,然后在1年内每月评估一次。主要疗效终点为新水疱形成停止的时间。次要疗效终点包括其他皮肤愈合事件的时间、疼痛缓解时间、播散频率和带状疱疹复发频率。在多变量分析中,索立夫定在缩短新水疱形成停止时间方面优于阿昔洛韦(相对危险度[RR]=1.54,95%置信区间[CI]=1.00至2.36;P=0.049)和总皮损结痂时间(RR=1.48,95%CI=1.07至2.04;P=0.017)。在单变量分析中,索立夫定在新水疱形成停止方面有优势趋势(中位数为3天对4天;P=0.07),在总皮损结痂时间方面有显著优势(中位数为7天对8天;P=0.02)。两个治疗组在带状疱疹相关疼痛缓解时间、播散频率和带状疱疹复发频率方面没有差异。两种药物耐受性均良好。索立夫定是治疗HIV感染患者带状疱疹的有效药物,与阿昔洛韦治疗相比,可加速皮肤愈合。