Cummings P, Weiss N S
University of Washington School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Seattle 98104-2499, USA.
Inj Prev. 1998 Mar;4(1):54-7. doi: 10.1136/ip.4.1.54.
Descriptions of exposure histories in persons with the same injury or illness ("case series"), and descriptions of outcomes in persons with the same exposure ("exposure series"), have the potential to contribute knowledge relevant to disease etiology in some special situations. The case series can be thought of as a primitive form of case-control study--one in which the controls are only implied. Similarly, the exposure series is a rudimentary type of cohort study. By keeping these analogies in mind, those who author or read studies without controls can assess the design or results for selection bias, confounding, or information bias. While studies without controls cannot supplant true case-control or cohort studies, they are relatively cheap and easy to perform, and there are circumstances in which they provide valuable information. Attention to design is needed to strengthen the results they provide.
对患有相同损伤或疾病的人(“病例系列”)的暴露史描述,以及对具有相同暴露情况的人(“暴露系列”)的结局描述,在某些特殊情况下有可能提供与疾病病因相关的知识。病例系列可被视为病例对照研究的一种原始形式——一种仅隐含对照的研究。同样,暴露系列是队列研究的一种初级类型。牢记这些类比,那些撰写或阅读无对照研究的人可以评估设计或结果中是否存在选择偏倚、混杂或信息偏倚。虽然无对照研究不能取代真正的病例对照或队列研究,但它们相对便宜且易于实施,并且在某些情况下能提供有价值的信息。需要关注设计以强化它们所提供的结果。