Rasmussen D T, Nekaris K A
Department of Anthropology, Washington University, St. Louis, Mo. 63130, USA.
Folia Primatol (Basel). 1998;69 Suppl 1:250-85. doi: 10.1159/000052716.
We integrate information from the fossil record, morphology, behavior and molecular studies to provide a current overview of lorisoid evolution. Several Eocene prosimians of the northern continents, including both omomyids and adapoids, have been suggested as possible lorisoid ancestors, but these cannot be substantiated as true strepsirhines. A small-bodied primate, Anchomomys, of the middle Eocene of Europe may be the best candidate among putative adapoids for status as a true strepsirhine. Recent finds of Eocene primates in Africa have revealed new prosimian taxa that are also viable contenders for strepsirhine status. Plesiopithecus teras is a Nycticebussized, nocturnal prosimian from the late Eocene, Fayum, Egypt, that shares cranial specializations with lorisoids, but it also retains primitive features (e.g. four premolars) and has unique specializations of the anterior teeth excluding it from direct lorisiform ancestry. Another unnamed Fayum primate resembles modern cheirogaleids in dental structure and body size. Two genera from Oman, Omanodon and Shizarodon, also reveal a mix of similarities to both cheirogaleids and anchomomyin adapoids. Resolving the phylogenetic position of these Africa primates of the early Tertiary will surely require more and better fossils. By the early to middle Miocene, lorisoids were well established in East Africa, and the debate about whether these represent lorisines or galagines is reviewed. Neontological data are used to address the controversial branching sequences among extent lorisid clades. Data from the skin and scent glands, when integrated with other lines of evidence, suggest that Asian and African lorisines share a common lorisine ancestry. The hypothesis of an African clade containing both pottos and galagos to the exclusion of Asian lorisines is less tenable. True galagines are found in the fossil record of Namibia, while true lorisines are known from the Miocene of Asia. The hypothetical branching sequences can be integrated with behavioral and morphological features to develop an adaptive model of lorisoid divergence. By specializing on two different foraging modes early in their radiation, lorisines and galagines subsequently underwent a chain of integrated evolutionary changes eventually having an impact on many components of locomotor behavior, anatomy, physiology, reproduction, life history, and social behavior. Ongoing evolutionary studies of extant galagines are illuminating population phenomena and processes of speciation in an ecological context.
我们整合了来自化石记录、形态学、行为学和分子研究的信息,以提供关于懒猴型灵长类动物进化的当前概述。北半球大陆的几种始新世原猴亚目动物,包括兔猴科和鼠狐猴科,都被认为可能是懒猴型灵长类动物的祖先,但这些都不能被证实为真正的湿鼻灵长类动物。欧洲始新世中期的一种小型灵长类动物——近猴,可能是假定的鼠狐猴科动物中作为真正湿鼻灵长类动物的最佳候选者。最近在非洲发现的始新世灵长类动物揭示了新的原猴亚目分类群,它们也是湿鼻灵长类动物身份的有力竞争者。埃及法尤姆晚始新世的一种与懒猴大小相当的夜行原猴亚目动物——特拉斯近猴,与懒猴型灵长类动物有共同的颅骨特化特征,但它也保留了原始特征(如四颗前磨牙),并且前牙有独特的特化特征,这使其不属于直接的懒猴类祖先。另一种未命名的法尤姆灵长类动物在牙齿结构和体型上类似于现代的倭狐猴科动物。阿曼的两个属——阿曼猴和希扎罗猴,也显示出与倭狐猴科动物和近猴科鼠狐猴类动物都有相似之处。确定这些第三纪早期非洲灵长类动物的系统发育位置肯定需要更多更好的化石。到中新世早期至中期,懒猴型灵长类动物在东非已经确立,本文对关于它们是懒猴科还是婴猴科的争论进行了综述。利用现代生物学数据来解决现存懒猴科分支之间有争议的分支顺序问题。来自皮肤和气味腺的数据,与其他证据线索相结合,表明亚洲和非洲懒猴科动物有共同的懒猴科祖先。一个包含树熊猴和婴猴而排除亚洲懒猴科动物的非洲分支假说不太站得住脚。在纳米比亚的化石记录中发现了真正的婴猴科动物,而在亚洲的中新世发现了真正的懒猴科动物。可以将假设的分支顺序与行为和形态特征相结合,以建立一个懒猴型灵长类动物分化的适应性模型。通过在辐射早期专门采用两种不同的觅食模式,懒猴科动物和婴猴科动物随后经历了一系列综合的进化变化,最终对运动行为、解剖学、生理学、繁殖、生活史和社会行为的许多组成部分产生了影响。对现存婴猴科动物正在进行的进化研究正在阐明生态背景下的种群现象和物种形成过程。