Spinillo A, Capuzzo E, Tenti P, De Santolo A, Piazzi G, Iasci A
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Gynecol Oncol. 1998 May;69(2):109-13. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1998.4985.
To evaluate the adequacy of cytology in detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-seropositive women compared to controls.
A cross-sectional study was carried out evaluating 241 HIV-seropositive women and 991 controls (404 HIV seronegative and 587 of unknown HIV status) at risk for CIN attending a vaginitis clinic. All patients had a Pap smear and a standard colposcopic examination of the lower genital tract. Cervical biopsies were taken as indicated by colposcopy. Cytology and histology slides were read by a cytopathologist blinded to patients' serostatus. False-negative cytologic cases were reviewed by three independent cytopathologists to estimate sampling and screening error rates. Sensitivity, specificity, and false-negative rate of cytologic smears were compared between HIV seropositives and controls. We estimated the sampling and screening error rates among cases with false-negative cytology.
Among seropositives, the sensitivity, specificity, and the false-negative smear rate for CIN were 73.4% (47/64), 97.1% (134/138), and 26.6% (17/64), respectively. The corresponding figures in controls were 83.8% (83/99), 99.04% (825/833), and 16.2% (16/99), respectively, and did not differ significantly from those of seropositives. The negative predictive value of cytology was lower among seropositives (134/151) than in controls (825/841, chi2 = 34.8, P < .001). The agreement between cytologic readings and combined colposcopy and histology was stronger among controls (kappa = 0.789, 95% CI 0.723 to 0.856) than among seropositives (kappa = 0. 593, 95% CI 0.475 to 0.712). Three independent cytopathologists were unable to detect atypical cells in 52.9% (9/17) of false-negative smears taken from seropositive women as opposed to 37.5% (6/16) of controls.
The sensitivity, specificity, and false negative rate of screening cytology for CIN among HIV seropositive women are comparable with those in the general population. Since almost 50% of false-negative results could be attributed to sampling errors, more frequent cytological screening may prove to be beneficial to this high-risk group.
评估细胞学检查在检测人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)血清反应阳性女性与对照组相比的宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)方面的充分性。
进行了一项横断面研究,评估了241名HIV血清反应阳性女性和991名对照组(404名HIV血清阴性和587名HIV状态未知),这些女性因患CIN而有风险,她们在一家阴道炎诊所就诊。所有患者均进行了巴氏涂片检查和下生殖道的标准阴道镜检查。根据阴道镜检查结果进行宫颈活检。细胞学和组织学切片由一位对患者血清状态不知情的细胞病理学家阅片。对假阴性细胞学病例由三位独立的细胞病理学家进行复查,以估计采样和筛查错误率。比较HIV血清阳性者和对照组之间细胞学涂片的敏感性、特异性和假阴性率。我们估计了细胞学检查为假阴性的病例中的采样和筛查错误率。
在血清阳性者中,CIN的敏感性、特异性和假阴性涂片率分别为73.4%(47/64)、97.1%(134/身38)和26.6%(17/64)。对照组中的相应数字分别为83.8%(83/99)、99.04%(825/833)和16.2%(16/99),与血清阳性者相比无显著差异。血清阳性者中细胞学检查的阴性预测值(134/151)低于对照组(825/841,χ² = 34.8,P <.001)。细胞学检查结果与联合阴道镜检查和组织学检查之间的一致性在对照组中(kappa = 0.789,95%CI 0.723至0.856)比在血清阳性者中(kappa = 0.593,95%CI 0.475至0.712)更强。三位独立的细胞病理学家在从血清阳性女性中获取的52.9%(9/17)的假阴性涂片中未能检测到非典型细胞,而对照组中这一比例为37.5%(6/16)。
HIV血清反应阳性女性中CIN筛查细胞学检查的敏感性、特异性和假阴性率与一般人群相当。由于几乎50%的假阴性结果可归因于采样误差,更频繁的细胞学筛查可能对这一高危人群有益。