Suppr超能文献

房间隔缺损的手术闭合。微创心脏手术还是正中胸骨切开术?

Surgical closure of atrial septal defect. Minimally invasive cardiac surgery or median sternotomy?

作者信息

Chang C H, Lin P J, Chu J J, Liu H P, Tsai F C, Chung Y Y, Kung C C, Lin F C, Chiang C W, Su W J, Yang M W, Tan P P

机构信息

Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung Medical College, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 1998 Jun;12(6):820-4. doi: 10.1007/s004649900721.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Closure of ostium secundum atrial septal defect (ASD) vis median sternotomy (MS) is a simple procedure for most cardiac surgeons. Minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) has recently been applied in the management of intracardiac lesions.

METHODS

We report our experience in surgical closure of isolated ASD via MICS in 60 patients and via MS in 58 patients. There was no difference between these two groups in gender, age, body weight, ratio of systemic to pulmonary blood flow, and pulmonary arterial pressure.

RESULTS

The duration of cardiopulmonary bypass was significantly longer in the MICS group than in the MS group [27 to 126 min (42 +/- 12) and 14 to 158 min (27 +/- 11), respectively; (p < 0.001]. However, the length of incision, incidence of temporary pacemaker wire insertion rate, duration of endotracheal intubation, timing of oral intake, postoperative day drainage amount, incidence of parenteral analgesic injection, postoperative length of stay, and return to normal activity interval were significant shorter and lower in patients of the MICS group than in those of the MS group. All the patients recovered rapidly from the surgery. Follow-up was complete in all patients, with no late complications and no residual shunt.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that MICS is a good option for surgical closure of ASD.

摘要

背景

对于大多数心脏外科医生而言,经正中胸骨切开术(MS)闭合继发孔型房间隔缺损(ASD)是一种简单的手术。微创心脏手术(MICS)最近已应用于心脏内病变的治疗。

方法

我们报告了60例经MICS和58例经MS手术闭合孤立性ASD的经验。两组在性别、年龄、体重、体肺血流比和肺动脉压方面无差异。

结果

MICS组体外循环时间显著长于MS组[分别为27至126分钟(42±12)和14至158分钟(27±11);(p<0.001)]。然而,MICS组患者的切口长度、临时起搏器导线插入率、气管插管持续时间、经口进食时间、术后每日引流量、胃肠外镇痛注射发生率、术后住院时间以及恢复正常活动间隔均显著短于或低于MS组。所有患者术后恢复迅速。所有患者均完成随访,无晚期并发症且无残余分流。

结论

我们的结果表明,MICS是手术闭合ASD的一个良好选择。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验