Suppr超能文献

药品供应:家长作风、自主性与现实

Supply of medicines: paternalism, autonomy and reality.

作者信息

Prayle D, Brazier M

机构信息

Institute of Medicine, Law and Bioethics, University of Manchester.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 1998 Apr;24(2):93-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.24.2.93.

Abstract

Radical changes are taking place in the United Kingdom in relation to the classification of, and access to, medicines. More and more medicines are being made available over the counter both in local pharmacies and in supermarkets. The provision of more open access to medicines may be hailed as a triumph for patient autonomy. This paper examines whether such a claim is real or illusory. It explores the ethical and legal implications of deregulating medicines. Do patients benefit? What is the impact on pharmacists? Are the true beneficiaries of change largely the pharmaceutical industries?

摘要

在英国,药品的分类和获取方式正在发生根本性变化。越来越多的药品在当地药店和超市都可以非处方购买。提供更开放的药品获取渠道可能被誉为患者自主权的胜利。本文探讨这种说法是真实的还是虚幻的。它探讨了药品管制放松的伦理和法律影响。患者是否受益?对药剂师有什么影响?变革的真正受益者主要是制药行业吗?

相似文献

2
Informed consent and the psychiatric patient.
J Med Ethics. 1987 Mar;13(1):12-6. doi: 10.1136/jme.13.1.12.
3
Paternalism and levels of knowledge: a comment on Rainbolt.
Bioethics. 1989 Apr;3(2):135-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.1989.tb00334.x.
4
Prescription drug laws: justified hard paternalism.处方药法:合理的强硬家长主义。
Bioethics. 1989 Jan;3(1):45-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.1989.tb00327.x.
7
Paternalism modernised.现代化的家长式作风。
J Med Ethics. 1985 Dec;11(4):184-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.11.4.184.
8
Paternalism and medical ethics.家长主义与医学伦理学。
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985 Jun 29;290(6486):1971-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.290.6486.1971.
9
The pharmacist's role in patient care.
Hastings Cent Rep. 1991 Jan-Feb;21(1):12-7.

引用本文的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验