• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

母婴对话中的通用名词短语。

Generic noun phrases in mother-child conversations.

作者信息

Pappas A, Gelman S A

机构信息

Wayne State University, USA.

出版信息

J Child Lang. 1998 Feb;25(1):19-33. doi: 10.1017/s0305000997003292.

DOI:10.1017/s0305000997003292
PMID:9604567
Abstract

Generic noun phrases (e.g. Tigers are fierce) are of interest for their semantic properties: they capture 'essential' properties, are timeless, and are context-free. The present study examines use of generic noun phrases by preschool children and their mothers. Mother-child pairs were videotaped while looking through a book of animal pictures. Each page depicted either a single instance of a particular category (e.g. one crab) or multiple instances of a particular category (e.g. many crabs). The results indicated a striking difference in how generics vs. non-generics were distributed, both in the speech of mothers and in the speech of preschool children. Whereas the form of non-generic noun phrases was closely linked to the structure of the page (i.e. singular noun phrases were used more often when a single instance was presented; plural noun phrases were used more often when multiple instances were presented), the form of generic noun phrases was independent of the information depicted (e.g. plural noun phrases were as frequent when only one instance was presented as when multiple instances were presented). We interpret the data as providing evidence that generic noun phrases differ in their semantics and conceptual organization from non-generic noun phrases, both in the input to young children and in children's own speech. Thus, this simple linguistic device may provide input to, and a reflection of, children's early developing notion of 'kinds'.

摘要

类属名词短语(例如“老虎很凶猛”)因其语义属性而备受关注:它们捕捉“本质”属性,不受时间限制,且与上下文无关。本研究考察了学龄前儿童及其母亲对类属名词短语的使用情况。在母子俩翻看一本动物图片书时对他们进行了录像。每一页要么描绘了某一特定类别中的单个实例(例如一只螃蟹),要么描绘了某一特定类别中的多个实例(例如许多螃蟹)。结果表明,无论是在母亲的言语中还是在学龄前儿童的言语中,类属名词短语与非类属名词短语的分布方式都存在显著差异。非类属名词短语的形式与页面结构紧密相关(即当呈现单个实例时,单数名词短语使用得更频繁;当呈现多个实例时,复数名词短语使用得更频繁),而类属名词短语的形式与所描绘的信息无关(例如,当只呈现一个实例时,复数名词短语的使用频率与呈现多个实例时一样高)。我们将这些数据解释为提供了证据,表明类属名词短语在语义和概念组织上与非类属名词短语不同,这在幼儿的输入语言和儿童自己的言语中都有所体现。因此,这种简单的语言手段可能为儿童早期发展的“类别”概念提供输入,并反映这一概念。

相似文献

1
Generic noun phrases in mother-child conversations.母婴对话中的通用名词短语。
J Child Lang. 1998 Feb;25(1):19-33. doi: 10.1017/s0305000997003292.
2
A cross-linguistic comparison of generic noun phrases in English and Mandarin.英语和汉语中类指名词短语的跨语言比较。
Cognition. 1998 Jun;66(3):215-48. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(98)00021-3.
3
Preschoolers' use of morphosyntactic cues to identify generic sentences: indefinite singular noun phrases, tense, and aspect.学前儿童使用形态句法线索识别泛指句:不定单数名词短语、时态和体貌。
Child Dev. 2011 Sep-Oct;82(5):1561-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01615.x. Epub 2011 Jul 25.
4
Preschool children use linguistic form class and pragmatic cues to interpret generics.学龄前儿童使用语言形式类别和语用线索来解释类属句。
Child Dev. 2003 Jan-Feb;74(1):308-25. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00537.
5
Maternal input to children with specific language impairment during shared book reading: is mothers' language in tune with their children's production?母亲在与特定语言障碍儿童共同阅读时的输入:母亲的语言是否与孩子的产出相协调?
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2014 Mar-Apr;49(2):204-14. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12062. Epub 2013 Nov 13.
6
Beyond labeling: the role of maternal input in the acquisition of richly structured categories.超越标签:母亲的输入在丰富结构化类别习得中的作用。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1998;63(1):I-V, 1-148; discussion 149-57.
7
Children's interpretation of generic noun phrases.儿童对类属名词短语的理解。
Dev Psychol. 2002 Nov;38(6):883-94. doi: 10.1037//0012-1649.38.6.883.
8
Noun phrase elaboration in children's spoken stories.儿童口语故事中的名词短语阐述
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2008 Apr;39(2):145-57. doi: 10.1044/0161-1461(2008/014).
9
Evidence for a distinct kind of noun.一种独特名词的证据。
Cognition. 1994 Mar;51(3):267-84. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(94)90056-6.
10
A longitudinal analysis of young children's cohesion and noun specification in narratives.幼儿叙事中连贯性与名词具体性的纵向分析。
J Child Lang. 1991 Jun;18(2):397-415. doi: 10.1017/s0305000900011120.

引用本文的文献

1
Reasoning about knowledge: Children's evaluations of generality and verifiability.关于知识的推理:儿童对普遍性和可验证性的评估。
Cogn Psychol. 2015 Dec;83:22-39. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2015.08.007. Epub 2015 Oct 8.
2
Children's Developing Intuitions About the Truth Conditions and Implications of Novel Generics Versus Quantified Statements.儿童对新奇类属句与量化陈述的真值条件及含义的直觉发展
Cogn Sci. 2015 May;39(4):711-38. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12176. Epub 2014 Oct 9.
3
Individual differences in children's and parents' generic language.
儿童与父母类属语言中的个体差异。
Child Dev. 2014 May-Jun;85(3):924-940. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12187. Epub 2013 Nov 22.
4
Generic Language Use Reveals Domain Differences in Children's Expectations about Animal and Artifact Categories.通用语言使用揭示了儿童对动物和人工制品类别的期望中的领域差异。
Cogn Dev. 2013 Jan;28(1):63-75. doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2012.09.002.
5
Generic language facilitates children's cross-classification.通用语言有助于儿童进行交叉分类。
Cogn Dev. 2012 Apr;27(2):154-167. doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2012.01.001.
6
Fast-mapping placeholders: Using words to talk about kinds.快速映射占位符:用词谈论类别。
Lang Learn Dev. 2010 Jul 1;6(3):223-240. doi: 10.1080/15475441.2010.484413.
7
Generic Language in Parent-Child Conversations.亲子对话中的通用语言。
Lang Learn Dev. 2008;4(1):1-31. doi: 10.1080/15475440701542625.
8
Two-year-olds use the generic/nongeneric distinction to guide their inferences about novel kinds.两岁儿童使用通用/非通用区分来指导他们对新种类的推理。
Child Dev. 2011 Mar-Apr;82(2):493-507. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01572.x. Epub 2011 Mar 10.
9
Differences in preschoolers' and adults' use of generics about novel animals and artifacts: a window onto a conceptual divide.学龄前儿童与成人对新奇动物和人工制品使用类属词的差异:通向概念鸿沟的一扇窗。
Cognition. 2009 Jan;110(1):1-22. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.08.005. Epub 2008 Nov 28.