Suppr超能文献

早期读写能力促进对儿童语言发展及家庭阅读环境的影响:一项随机对照试验

Effects of Early Literacy Promotion on Child Language Development and Home Reading Environment: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Guevara James P, Erkoboni Danielle, Gerdes Marsha, Winston Sherry, Sands Danielle, Rogers Kirsten, Haecker Trude, Jimenez Manuel E, Mendelsohn Alan L

机构信息

PolicyLab, Center to Bridge Research, Practice, and Policy, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.

Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.

出版信息

J Pediatr X. 2020 May 11;2:100020. doi: 10.1016/j.ympdx.2020.100020. eCollection 2020 Spring.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine if early literacy promotion, which consisted of board books and reading promotion beginning with newborns, is more effective than standard literacy promotion beginning at 6 months.

STUDY DESIGN

Hybrid type 1 randomized controlled implementation trial of Medicaid-eligible newborns. Prior to 6 months of age, early literacy promotion participants received board books and reading promotion at well visits plus weekly text messages on reading, while standard literacy promotion participants only received weekly text messages on safety. Both groups received board books and reading promotion at well visits after 6 months as part of Reach Out and Read. Measures included proportion who received board books to assess implementation and StimQ Read Subscale (SQRS) scores and Preschool Language Scale-Fifth Edition (PLS-5) scores at 6 and 24 months to assess outcomes. Differences in measures were assessed using intention-to-treat analysis.

RESULTS

Of 120 newborns enrolled, most were African American, resided with a single parent, or had a parent with ≤high school education. Overall 82% of early literacy promotion participants received books/counseling at well visits <6 months old. Children in the early literacy promotion arm had greater SQRS scores (11.0 vs 9.4,  = .006) but similar PLS-5 scores at 6 months, but there were no differences in SQRS or PLS-5 scores between groups at 24 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of a literacy promotion program early in infancy was associated with richer home reading environments at 6 months but did not improve language development. Although an early literacy program was feasible, additional study may be needed to assess other potential benefits.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02713659.

摘要

目的

确定从新生儿期开始的包括布板书和阅读推广的早期读写能力促进措施是否比6个月开始的标准读写能力促进措施更有效。

研究设计

针对符合医疗补助条件的新生儿的1型混合随机对照实施试验。在6个月龄之前,早期读写能力促进组的参与者在健康检查时收到布板书和阅读推广资料,并每周收到有关阅读的短信,而标准读写能力促进组的参与者只收到有关安全的每周短信。两组在6个月后作为“伸出援手并阅读”项目的一部分,在健康检查时都收到布板书和阅读推广资料。测量指标包括接受布板书的比例以评估实施情况,以及在6个月和24个月时的刺激阅读分量表(SQRS)得分和《学前语言量表第五版》(PLS-5)得分以评估结果。使用意向性分析评估测量指标的差异。

结果

在登记的120名新生儿中,大多数是非裔美国人,与单亲居住,或父母受教育程度≤高中。总体而言,82%的早期读写能力促进组参与者在6个月龄之前的健康检查时收到了书籍/咨询。早期读写能力促进组的儿童在6个月时的SQRS得分更高(11.0对9.4,P = .006),但PLS-5得分相似,而在24个月时两组之间的SQRS或PLS-5得分没有差异。

结论

婴儿期早期实施读写能力促进项目与6个月时更丰富的家庭阅读环境相关,但并未改善语言发展。虽然早期读写能力项目是可行的,但可能需要进一步研究以评估其他潜在益处。

试验注册

Clinicaltrials.gov:NCT02713659。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e51/10236559/ed3b91a10890/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验