• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[指南方法学质量清单。对提高医学指南质量的贡献]

[Checklist for methodological quality of guidelines. A contribution to quality promotion of medical guidelines].

作者信息

Ollenschläger G, Helou A, Kostovic-Cilic L, Perleth M, Raspe H H, Rienhoff O, Selbmann H K, Oesingmann U

机构信息

Arztliche Zentralstelle Qualitätssicherung, Köln.

出版信息

Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 1998 Apr;92(3):191-4.

PMID:9606887
Abstract

The society of physicians of Germany and the society of panel physicians laid down in the "assessment criteria for guidelines in medical care" what kind of demands the medical selfadministration makes on guidelines. This measure also had the goal to support and strengthen the efforts of the AWMF for guidelines of high value. On the basis of these assessment criteria, a tool was compiled for the systematic registration and documentation of quality criteria for good guidelines for the first time in areas of German language. This check list is guided by the structure and content of the "Criteria for Appraisal for National Guidelines" by the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network.

摘要

德国医师协会和专科医师协会在“医疗保健指南评估标准”中规定了医疗自我管理对指南提出的要求。这项措施的目标还包括支持和加强德国医学科学院制定高价值指南的工作。基于这些评估标准,首次编制了一种工具,用于在德语领域对优质指南的质量标准进行系统登记和记录。这份检查表以苏格兰校际指南网络的“国家指南评估标准”的结构和内容为指导。

相似文献

1
[Checklist for methodological quality of guidelines. A contribution to quality promotion of medical guidelines].[指南方法学质量清单。对提高医学指南质量的贡献]
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 1998 Apr;92(3):191-4.
2
[Medical guidelines in Germany--current status and future developments].[德国的医学指南——现状与未来发展]
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 1998 May;92(4):273-80.
3
[Goals, possibilities and limits of quality evaluation of guidelines. A background report on the user manual of the "Methodological Quality of Guidelines" check list].[指南质量评估的目标、可能性与局限。关于“指南方法学质量”检查表用户手册的背景报告]
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 1998 Jun;92(5):361-5.
4
[The German Guideline Clearinghouse on Breast Cancer: the need for frequent updating of breast cancer guidelines requires effective guideline updating procedures].[德国乳腺癌指南信息中心:乳腺癌指南频繁更新的需求需要有效的指南更新程序]
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2004 Aug;98(5):403-11.
5
[Health services research and guidelines--from the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies' (AWMF) perspective].[从科学医学协会联合会(AWMF)的视角看卫生服务研究与指南]
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2006;100(8):597-602.
6
[The guideline clearing programme of the self-governmental bodies in the German health care system--a project to promote quality assurance in medicine].[德国医疗保健系统中自治机构的指南清理计划——一项促进医学质量保证的项目]
Gesundheitswesen. 1999 Mar;61(3):105-11.
7
[Methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines in Germany: results of a systemic assessment of guidelines presented on the Internet].[德国临床实践指南的方法学质量:对互联网上发布的指南进行系统评估的结果]
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 1998 Aug;92(6):421-8.
8
[Practice guidelines in rehabilitation: infringement upon physicians' autonomy or foundation for better outcomes?].[康复实践指南:侵犯医生自主权还是实现更好治疗效果的基础?]
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2004 Oct;43(5):304-11. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-828434.
9
[Current initiatives in Germany for translating national guidelines into reality - a survey].[德国将国家指南转化为实际行动的当前举措——一项调查]
Gesundheitswesen. 2002 Oct;64(10):513-20. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-34617.
10
[Guidelines in surgery: from the viewpoint of quality assurance].[外科手术指南:从质量保证的视角]
Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd. 1997;114:83-5.

引用本文的文献

1
The development of guidelines for the treatment of patients with mental disorders under particular consideration of rehabilitative aspects.制定特别考虑康复方面的精神障碍患者治疗指南。
Psychosoc Med. 2004 Jul 1;1:Doc05.
2
[Problems of evidence-based medicine in psychopharmacotherapy: problems of evidence grading and of the evidence basis for complex clinical decision making].[精神药物治疗中循证医学的问题:证据分级问题及复杂临床决策的证据基础问题]
Nervenarzt. 2007 Sep;78(9):1014-27. doi: 10.1007/s00115-007-2291-3.
3
Consensus conferences must include a systematic search and categorization of the evidence.
共识会议必须包括对证据的系统检索和分类。
Surg Endosc. 2000 Oct;14(10):908-10. doi: 10.1007/s004640000283.