Suppr超能文献

[德国临床实践指南的方法学质量:对互联网上发布的指南进行系统评估的结果]

[Methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines in Germany: results of a systemic assessment of guidelines presented on the Internet].

作者信息

Helou A, Perleth M, Bitzer E M, Dörning H, Schwartz F W

机构信息

Abtl. Epidemiologie, Sozialmedizin und Gesundheitssystemforschung Institut für Sozialmedizin, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover.

出版信息

Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 1998 Aug;92(6):421-8.

PMID:9757523
Abstract

Critics claim that most of the German clinical practice guidelines are of poor quality having produced by informal ad hoc methodologies without a rigorous approach. This paper reports on the systematic appraisal of 329 guidelines published online by the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies (AWMF) in Germany. The results of this study suggest that most of the guidelines presented in Internet do not meet internationally recognised criteria for quality. Proposals are offered how to enhance the methodological quality of future guidelines.

摘要

批评者称,德国大多数临床实践指南质量欠佳,是通过非正式的临时方法制定的,缺乏严谨性。本文报告了对德国科学医学协会(AWMF)在线发布的329份指南的系统评估。这项研究结果表明,互联网上呈现的大多数指南不符合国际认可的质量标准。文中提出了提高未来指南方法质量的建议。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验