Low D A, Harms W B, Mutic S, Purdy J A
Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Division of Radiation Oncology, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA.
Med Phys. 1998 May;25(5):656-61. doi: 10.1118/1.598248.
The commissioning of a three-dimensional treatment planning system requires comparisons of measured and calculated dose distributions. Techniques have been developed to facilitate quantitative comparisons, including superimposed isodoses, dose-difference, and distance-to-agreement (DTA) distributions. The criterion for acceptable calculation performance is generally defined as a tolerance of the dose and DTA in regions of low and high dose gradients, respectively. The dose difference and DTA distributions complement each other in their useful regions. A composite distribution has recently been developed that presents the dose difference in regions that fail both dose-difference and DTA comparison criteria. Although the composite distribution identifies locations where the calculation fails the preselected criteria, no numerical quality measure is provided for display or analysis. A technique is developed to unify dose distribution comparisons using the acceptance criteria. The measure of acceptability is the multidimensional distance between the measurement and calculation points in both the dose and the physical distance, scaled as a fraction of the acceptance criteria. In a space composed of dose and spatial coordinates, the acceptance criteria form an ellipsoid surface, the major axis scales of which are determined by individual acceptance criteria and the center of which is located at the measurement point in question. When the calculated dose distribution surface passes through the ellipsoid, the calculation passes the acceptance test for the measurement point. The minimum radial distance between the measurement point and the calculation points (expressed as a surface in the dose-distance space) is termed the gamma index. Regions where gamma > 1 correspond to locations where the calculation does not meet the acceptance criteria. The determination of gamma throughout the measured dose distribution provides a presentation that quantitatively indicates the calculation accuracy. Examples of a 6 MV beam penumbra are used to illustrate the gamma index.
三维治疗计划系统的调试需要对测量剂量分布和计算剂量分布进行比较。已开发出一些技术来促进定量比较,包括叠加等剂量线、剂量差异和距离一致性(DTA)分布。可接受计算性能的标准通常分别定义为低剂量梯度区域和高剂量梯度区域中剂量和DTA的容差。剂量差异分布和DTA分布在其有用区域内相互补充。最近开发了一种复合分布,它显示了在剂量差异和DTA比较标准均不满足的区域中的剂量差异。尽管复合分布识别出计算未达到预选标准的位置,但未提供用于显示或分析的数值质量度量。开发了一种使用验收标准来统一剂量分布比较的技术。可接受性的度量是测量点与计算点在剂量和物理距离方面的多维距离,按验收标准的分数进行缩放。在由剂量和空间坐标组成的空间中,验收标准形成一个椭球表面,其主轴尺度由各个验收标准确定,其中心位于所讨论的测量点处。当计算的剂量分布表面穿过椭球时,计算通过该测量点的验收测试。测量点与计算点之间的最小径向距离(在剂量 - 距离空间中表示为一个表面)称为伽马指数。伽马>1的区域对应于计算不符合验收标准的位置。在整个测量剂量分布中确定伽马指数可提供一种定量指示计算准确性的展示。使用6MV射束半影的示例来说明伽马指数。