• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

截石位与站立位时盆腔器官脱垂情况的比较。

Comparison of pelvic organ prolapse in the dorsal lithotomy compared with the standing position.

作者信息

Swift S E, Herring M

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston 29425, USA.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Jun;91(6):961-4. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(98)00111-2.

DOI:10.1016/s0029-7844(98)00111-2
PMID:9611004
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine if there is a significant difference in the degree of pelvic organ prolapse assigned during examination in the standing position compared with the dorsal lithotomy position with the patient performing maximal Valsalva maneuver.

METHODS

Fifty-one women with symptoms of pelvic organ prolapse were examined in both the dorsal lithotomy position, while performing maximal Valsalva, and in the standing position at the same visit by one of two examiners. Nine site-specific measures and summary stages were recorded, as outlined by the International Continence Society's classification system for pelvic organ prolapse. The data were analyzed by Wilcoxon signed-rank test and correlation coefficients.

RESULTS

The mean age was 52 +/- 15 years. Excellent correlation was noted between all six points representing the vaginal prolapse. The R values for point Aa were 0.97, Ba 0.96, C 0.98, Ap 0.97, Bp 0.96, and D 0.97. The total vaginal length, perineal body, and genital hiatus measurements were performed in the dorsal lithotomy position with the patient at rest and were not repeated. The stages were identical in 48 of 51 patients. The average stage in the dorsal lithotomy position was 2.3 and in the standing position, 2.3. There was no statistically significant difference between the stage or any of the measured points in the dorsal lithotomy and standing examinations.

CONCLUSION

The degree of pelvic organ prolapse can be assessed adequately in the dorsal lithotomy position with the patient performing maximal Valsalva. It is not necessary to routinely repeat the examination in the standing position.

摘要

目的

确定在患者进行最大程度瓦尔萨尔瓦动作时,站立位检查与膀胱截石位检查所判定的盆腔器官脱垂程度是否存在显著差异。

方法

51名有盆腔器官脱垂症状的女性在同一次就诊时,由两名检查者之一分别在膀胱截石位(进行最大程度瓦尔萨尔瓦动作时)和站立位进行检查。按照国际尿控协会盆腔器官脱垂分类系统的概述,记录9项特定部位测量值和总体分期。数据采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验和相关系数进行分析。

结果

平均年龄为52±15岁。代表阴道脱垂的所有六个点之间均存在极好的相关性。Aa点的R值为0.97,Ba点为0.96,C点为0.98,Ap点为0.97,Bp点为0.96,D点为0.97。在膀胱截石位患者静息状态下测量了阴道总长度、会阴体和生殖裂孔,未重复测量。51名患者中有48名分期相同。膀胱截石位的平均分期为2.3,站立位为2.3。膀胱截石位和站立位检查在分期或任何测量点之间均无统计学显著差异。

结论

在膀胱截石位让患者进行最大程度瓦尔萨尔瓦动作时,能够充分评估盆腔器官脱垂程度。无需常规在站立位重复检查。

相似文献

1
Comparison of pelvic organ prolapse in the dorsal lithotomy compared with the standing position.截石位与站立位时盆腔器官脱垂情况的比较。
Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Jun;91(6):961-4. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(98)00111-2.
2
Effects of a full bladder and patient positioning on pelvic organ prolapse assessment.膀胱充盈及患者体位对盆腔器官脱垂评估的影响。
Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jul;104(1):37-41. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000131619.97936.e2.
3
Effect of patient position on clinical evaluation of pelvic organ prolapse.患者体位对盆腔器官脱垂临床评估的影响。
Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Jul;96(1):18-22. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(00)00859-0.
4
Relationship of degree of uterine prolapse between pelvic examination in lithotomy position with cervical traction and pelvic examination in standing position.截石位宫颈牵引下盆腔检查与站立位盆腔检查子宫脱垂程度的关系。
Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Aug;29(8):1173-1177. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3579-5. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
5
Pelvic organ support and prevalence by Pelvic Organ Prolapse-Quantification (POP-Q) in Korean women.韩国女性盆腔器官脱垂定量(POP-Q)评估的盆腔器官支持情况及患病率
J Urol. 2006 May;175(5):1769-72. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00993-6.
6
Effects of examination technique modifications on pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) results.检查技术改进对盆腔器官脱垂定量(POP-Q)结果的影响。
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2003 Jun;14(2):136-40. doi: 10.1007/s00192-002-1030-3. Epub 2003 Mar 28.
7
Does Patient Posture Affect the Ultrasound Evaluation of Pelvic Organ Prolapse?患者体位会影响盆腔器官脱垂的超声评估吗?
J Ultrasound Med. 2019 Jan;38(1):233-238. doi: 10.1002/jum.14688. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
8
Use of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse staging system of the International Continence Society, American Urogynecologic Society, and Society of Gynecologic Surgeons in perimenopausal women.国际尿控协会、美国妇科泌尿学会和妇科外科医师学会的盆腔器官脱垂分期系统在围绝经期女性中的应用。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Dec;181(6):1324-7; discussion 1327-8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70371-6.
9
Comparison between the Valsalva maneuver and intraoperative traction measurements in pelvic organ prolapse assessment.比较 Valsalva 动作与术中牵引测量在盆腔器官脱垂评估中的应用。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2017 Dec;139(3):358-362. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12319. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
10
Is urethral mobility really being assessed by the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) system?盆腔器官脱垂定量(POP-Q)系统真的能评估尿道活动度吗?
Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Mar;99(3):473-6. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01741-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk factors for recurrence of pelvic organ prolapse after vaginal surgery among Ugandan women: a prospective cohort study.乌干达女性阴道手术后盆腔器官脱垂复发的危险因素:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Jul;33(7):1933-1939. doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-04930-8. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
2
Relevance of open magnetic resonance imaging position (sitting and standing) to quantify pelvic organ prolapse in women.开放式磁共振成像体位(坐姿和站姿)对量化女性盆腔器官脱垂的相关性。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2018 Nov;12(11):E453-E460. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.5186. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
3
Relationship of degree of uterine prolapse between pelvic examination in lithotomy position with cervical traction and pelvic examination in standing position.
截石位宫颈牵引下盆腔检查与站立位盆腔检查子宫脱垂程度的关系。
Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Aug;29(8):1173-1177. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3579-5. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
4
Prolapse assessment supine and standing: do we need different cutoffs for "significant prolapse"?仰卧位和站立位的脱垂评估:对于“严重脱垂”我们是否需要不同的临界值?
Int Urogynecol J. 2018 May;29(5):685-689. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3342-3. Epub 2017 Apr 25.
5
Interobserver agreement of multicompartment ultrasound in the assessment of pelvic floor anatomy.多腔室超声评估盆底解剖结构的观察者间一致性
Br J Radiol. 2016;89(1059):20150704. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20150704. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
6
Accuracy of assessing Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification points using dynamic 2D transperineal ultrasound in women with pelvic organ prolapse.在盆腔器官脱垂女性中使用动态二维经会阴超声评估盆腔器官脱垂定量点的准确性。
Int Urogynecol J. 2012 Nov;23(11):1555-60. doi: 10.1007/s00192-012-1779-y. Epub 2012 Apr 28.
7
Does pre-operative traction on the cervix approximate intra-operative uterine prolapse? A randomised controlled trial.术前对宫颈进行牵引是否与术中子宫脱垂情况相近?一项随机对照试验。
Int Urogynecol J. 2012 Apr;23(4):417-22. doi: 10.1007/s00192-011-1656-0. Epub 2012 Jan 26.
8
"Eyeball" POP-Q examination: shortcut or valid assessment tool?“眼球”式盆腔器官脱垂定量检查:捷径还是有效的评估工具?
Int Urogynecol J. 2010 Aug;21(8):1005-9. doi: 10.1007/s00192-010-1139-8. Epub 2010 May 4.
9
Validation of the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) system in left lateral position.左侧卧位时盆腔器官脱垂量化(POP-Q)系统的验证
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009 Aug;20(8):979-83. doi: 10.1007/s00192-009-0884-z. Epub 2009 Apr 22.
10
Inter-observer reliability of digital vaginal examination using a four-grade scale in different patient positions.不同患者体位下使用四级量表进行数字化阴道检查的观察者间可靠性
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008 Sep;19(9):1303-7. doi: 10.1007/s00192-008-0635-6. Epub 2008 May 6.