• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

ADRF 特雷比奇奖学金。牙刷的微生物污染。一项初步研究。

ADRF Trebitsch Scholarship. The microbial contamination of toothbrushes. A pilot study.

作者信息

Taji S S, Rogers A H

机构信息

Department of Dentistry, University of Adelaide.

出版信息

Aust Dent J. 1998 Apr;43(2):128-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.1998.tb06101.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1834-7819.1998.tb06101.x
PMID:9612987
Abstract

Ten individuals were each supplied with a new toothbrush of the same type and brand, together with identical tubes of fluoridated toothpaste. After a three-week period, during which subjects were asked to follow their usual oral hygiene practices, the toothbrushes were collected and assayed for microbial contamination using a range of selective growth media. The total microbial load per toothbrush was found to be 10(4) to 10(5) colony forming units. Staphylococci were found on all toothbrushes and streptococci on all but one. These two genera were also quantitatively dominant. Candida, corynebacteria, pseudomonads and coliforms were identified in 70, 60, 50 and 30 per cent of toothbrushes, respectively. However, mutans streptococci, lactobacilli and black-pigmented Gram-negative anaerobic rods were not detected on any of the toothbrushes. For each individual, information on variables such as toothbrush rinsing practices and post-brushing storage methods and environment was collected. No obvious relationship between such variables and microbial load was apparent but it is suggested that more extensive studies are needed, taking into account additional parameters such as age and degree of toothbrush wear and the use of pre-brushing mouthwashes.

摘要

给10个人每人提供了一支相同类型和品牌的新牙刷,以及相同的含氟牙膏管。在为期三周的时间里,要求受试者遵循他们通常的口腔卫生习惯,之后收集牙刷,并使用一系列选择性生长培养基对其进行微生物污染检测。发现每支牙刷的总微生物负荷为10⁴至10⁵菌落形成单位。所有牙刷上都发现了葡萄球菌,除了一支牙刷外,其他所有牙刷上都发现了链球菌。这两个属在数量上也占主导地位。分别在70%、60%、50%和30%的牙刷中鉴定出念珠菌、棒状杆菌、假单胞菌和大肠菌群。然而,在任何一支牙刷上都未检测到变形链球菌、乳酸杆菌和黑色色素革兰氏阴性厌氧棒状菌。对于每个人,收集了诸如牙刷冲洗习惯、刷牙后储存方法和环境等变量的信息。这些变量与微生物负荷之间没有明显的关系,但建议进行更广泛的研究,同时考虑年龄、牙刷磨损程度和刷牙前使用漱口水等其他参数。

相似文献

1
ADRF Trebitsch Scholarship. The microbial contamination of toothbrushes. A pilot study.ADRF 特雷比奇奖学金。牙刷的微生物污染。一项初步研究。
Aust Dent J. 1998 Apr;43(2):128-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.1998.tb06101.x.
2
Microbial contamination of power toothbrushes: a comparison of solid-head versus hollow-head designs.电动牙刷的微生物污染:实心刷头与空心刷头设计的比较
J Dent Hyg. 2014 Aug;88(4):237-42.
3
Assessment of microbial contamination of toothbrush head: an in vitro study.牙刷头微生物污染的评估:一项体外研究。
Indian J Dent Res. 2011 Jan-Feb;22(1):2-5. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.79965.
4
Microbial contamination of toothbrushes with different principles of filament anchoring.具有不同刷毛固定原理的牙刷的微生物污染情况。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2005 Jun;136(6):758-65; quiz 806. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2005.0259.
5
Toothbrush bristle wear and adherence of Streptococcus mutans.牙刷刷毛磨损与变形链球菌的黏附
Pediatr Dent. 2007 May-Jun;29(3):243-7.
6
The efficacy of chlorhexidine spray vs mouthwash in the microbial contamination of child toothbrushes.洗必泰喷雾与漱口水对儿童牙刷微生物污染的功效比较
J Dent Child (Chic). 2007 Sep-Dec;74(3):177-81.
7
Effects of an antimicrobial additive to toothbrushes on residual periodontal pathogens.牙刷抗菌添加剂对牙周残余病原体的影响。
J Clin Dent. 2004;15(3):66-70.
8
Can toothpaste or a toothbrush with antibacterial tufts prevent toothbrush contamination?含有抗菌刷毛的牙膏或牙刷能防止牙刷受到污染吗?
J Periodontol. 2003 Mar;74(3):312-22. doi: 10.1902/jop.2003.74.3.312.
9
Contamination of a toothbrush with antibacterial properties by oral microorganisms.口腔微生物对具有抗菌特性的牙刷的污染。
J Dent. 2007 Apr;35(4):331-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2006.10.007. Epub 2006 Nov 22.
10
Microorganisms on toothbrushes at day-care centers.日托中心牙刷上的微生物。
Acta Odontol Scand. 1994 Apr;52(2):93-8. doi: 10.3109/00016359409029061.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of Microbial Contamination of a Toothbrush Head with and without a Protective Cover: An Study.带和不带保护套的牙刷头微生物污染评估:一项研究
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2022 Jul-Aug;15(4):455-457. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2403.
2
A Prospective Study on Assessment of Microbial Contamination of Toothbrushes and Methods of Their Decontamination.牙刷微生物污染评估及其去污方法的前瞻性研究
Cureus. 2022 Oct 10;14(10):e30155. doi: 10.7759/cureus.30155. eCollection 2022 Oct.
3
Knowledge Attitude and Practice of Dentists Regarding Toothbrush Hygiene and Disinfection in Private Dental Colleges of Lucknow City India: A Cross-sectional Study.
印度勒克瑙市私立牙科学院牙医对牙刷卫生与消毒的知识、态度及实践:一项横断面研究
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2022 Jan-Feb;15(1):79-84. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2341.
4
Antibacterial and Antimicrobial Effects of Xanthorrhizol in the Prevention of Dental Caries: A Systematic Review.姜黄素在预防龋齿中的抗菌和抗微生物作用:系统评价。
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2021 Mar 11;15:1149-1156. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S290021. eCollection 2021.
5
Toothbrush microbiomes feature a meeting ground for human oral and environmental microbiota.牙刷微生物组是人类口腔和环境微生物群的交汇点。
Microbiome. 2021 Jan 31;9(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s40168-020-00983-x.
6
The Toothbrush Microbiome: Impact of User Age, Period of Use and Bristle Material on the Microbial Communities of Toothbrushes.牙刷微生物群:使用者年龄、使用时长和刷毛材质对牙刷微生物群落的影响
Microorganisms. 2020 Sep 9;8(9):1379. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8091379.
7
Effectiveness of single use over multiple use toothbrushes on negative oral microflora of plaque.一次性牙刷与多次使用牙刷对牙菌斑阴性口腔微生物群的效果比较
J Family Med Prim Care. 2019 Dec 10;8(12):3940-3943. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_846_19. eCollection 2019 Dec.
8
An In-vitro Assessment of the Physical and Chemical Properties of Toothbrush Bristle Following Decontamination by Three Different Methods: A Pilot Study.三种不同方法去污后牙刷刷毛物理和化学性质的体外评估:一项初步研究
Cureus. 2019 Jun 25;11(6):e4992. doi: 10.7759/cureus.4992.
9
Comparison of efficacy of herbal disinfectants with chlorhexidine mouthwash on decontamination of toothbrushes: An experimental trial.草药消毒剂与氯己定漱口水对牙刷消毒效果的比较:一项实验性试验。
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2016 Jan-Feb;6(1):22-7. doi: 10.4103/2231-0762.175406.
10
Effectiveness of alternative methods for toothbrush disinfection: an in vitro study.牙刷消毒替代方法的有效性:一项体外研究。
ScientificWorldJournal. 2014;2014:726190. doi: 10.1155/2014/726190. Epub 2014 May 25.