• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日托中心牙刷上的微生物。

Microorganisms on toothbrushes at day-care centers.

作者信息

Malmberg E, Birkhed D, Norvenius G, Norén J G, Dahlén G

机构信息

Department of Pedodontics, Faculty of Odontology, University of Göteborg, Sweden.

出版信息

Acta Odontol Scand. 1994 Apr;52(2):93-8. doi: 10.3109/00016359409029061.

DOI:10.3109/00016359409029061
PMID:8048328
Abstract

The microflora on 44 toothbrushes at 4 day-care centers in the city of Göteborg have been investigated as a presumptive risk factor for transmission of microorganisms by children. Non-supervised toothbrushing without the use of toothpaste was performed at the day-care centers twice a day. Streptococci, predominantly S. salivarius, S. sanguis, and S. mitis, were the most frequently recorded group of microorganisms and generally constituted the greatest part of the flora (on average, 50%). Beta-hemolytic streptococci were not found in any sample. Haemophilus species were noted in 82% of the samples. H. parainfluenzae being the most frequent, and H. influenzae being identified in only one sample. Anaerobes constituted on average a third of the microflora. Staphylococci were identified in 86% of the samples, S. epidermidis dominating. Fungi including molds were found in 50% of the samples, and from one day-care center large numbers of enteric organisms were identified. Thus this study shows that unsupervised toothbrushing at day-care centers can be questioned, more from a general hygienic point of view than from the risk of transmitting serious pathogens.

摘要

哥德堡市4家日托中心的44支牙刷上的微生物群落作为儿童传播微生物的假定风险因素进行了调查。日托中心每天进行两次不使用牙膏的无监督刷牙。链球菌,主要是唾液链球菌、血链球菌和缓症链球菌,是最常记录的微生物组,通常构成菌群的最大部分(平均50%)。任何样本中均未发现β-溶血性链球菌。82%的样本中发现了嗜血杆菌属。副流感嗜血杆菌最为常见,仅在一个样本中鉴定出流感嗜血杆菌。厌氧菌平均占微生物群落的三分之一。86%的样本中鉴定出葡萄球菌,以表皮葡萄球菌为主。50%的样本中发现了包括霉菌在内的真菌,并且在一个日托中心鉴定出大量肠道生物。因此,这项研究表明,从一般卫生角度而非传播严重病原体的风险角度来看,日托中心的无监督刷牙可能存在问题。

相似文献

1
Microorganisms on toothbrushes at day-care centers.日托中心牙刷上的微生物。
Acta Odontol Scand. 1994 Apr;52(2):93-8. doi: 10.3109/00016359409029061.
2
A quantitative approach to the effectiveness of ozone against microbiota organisms colonizing toothbrushes.一种关于臭氧对牙刷上定殖微生物群落有效性的定量研究方法。
J Dent. 2008 Aug;36(8):600-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2008.04.007. Epub 2008 May 27.
3
Effect of a single-use toothbrush on plaque microflora.一次性牙刷对菌斑微生物群的影响。
Indian J Dent Res. 2009 Oct-Dec;20(4):404-6. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.59431.
4
Microbial contamination of power toothbrushes: a comparison of solid-head versus hollow-head designs.电动牙刷的微生物污染:实心刷头与空心刷头设计的比较
J Dent Hyg. 2014 Aug;88(4):237-42.
5
ADRF Trebitsch Scholarship. The microbial contamination of toothbrushes. A pilot study.ADRF 特雷比奇奖学金。牙刷的微生物污染。一项初步研究。
Aust Dent J. 1998 Apr;43(2):128-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.1998.tb06101.x.
6
Residual contamination of toothbrushes by microorganisms.牙刷上微生物的残留污染。
ASDC J Dent Child. 1989 May-Jun;56(3):201-4.
7
A microbiological assessment of the oral hygiene of 24-72-month-old kindergarten children and disinfection of their toothbrushes.对 24-72 个月大的幼儿园儿童口腔卫生状况的微生物学评估及牙刷消毒。
BMC Oral Health. 2014 Aug 2;14:94. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-14-94.
8
[Potential pathogenic throat bacterial flora in acute successive pharyngitis and tonsillitis in children].[儿童急性连续性咽炎和扁桃体炎中潜在的致病性咽喉部细菌菌群]
Med Dosw Mikrobiol. 1995;47(1-2):25-33.
9
[Microflora of toothbrushes, with special reference to the incidence of staphylococci and streptococci].[牙刷的微生物群落,特别提及葡萄球菌和链球菌的发生率]
Fogorv Sz. 1987 Oct;80(10):299-302.
10
Assessment of microbial contamination of toothbrush head: an in vitro study.牙刷头微生物污染的评估:一项体外研究。
Indian J Dent Res. 2011 Jan-Feb;22(1):2-5. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.79965.

引用本文的文献

1
A Prospective Study on Assessment of Microbial Contamination of Toothbrushes and Methods of Their Decontamination.牙刷微生物污染评估及其去污方法的前瞻性研究
Cureus. 2022 Oct 10;14(10):e30155. doi: 10.7759/cureus.30155. eCollection 2022 Oct.
2
The Toothbrush Microbiome: Impact of User Age, Period of Use and Bristle Material on the Microbial Communities of Toothbrushes.牙刷微生物群:使用者年龄、使用时长和刷毛材质对牙刷微生物群落的影响
Microorganisms. 2020 Sep 9;8(9):1379. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8091379.
3
Effectiveness of single use over multiple use toothbrushes on negative oral microflora of plaque.
一次性牙刷与多次使用牙刷对牙菌斑阴性口腔微生物群的效果比较
J Family Med Prim Care. 2019 Dec 10;8(12):3940-3943. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_846_19. eCollection 2019 Dec.
4
Evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of garlic, tea tree oil, cetylpyridinium chloride, chlorhexidine, and ultraviolet sanitizing device in the decontamination of toothbrush.大蒜、茶树油、西吡氯铵、氯己定及紫外线消毒装置对牙刷去污抗菌效果的评估
Indian J Dent. 2014 Oct;5(4):183-9. doi: 10.4103/0975-962X.144718.
5
Influence of time, toothpaste and saliva in the retention of Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sanguinis on different toothbrushes.不同牙刷上时间、牙膏和唾液对变形链球菌和血链球菌黏附保留的影响。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2014 Jun;22(3):152-8. doi: 10.1590/1678-775720130017.
6
Comparative evaluation of ultraviolet and microwave sanitization techniques for toothbrush decontamination.紫外线和微波消毒技术用于牙刷去污的比较评估
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2011 Jan;1(1):20-6. doi: 10.4103/2231-0762.86383.
7
Children's toothbrush contamination in day-care centers: how to solve this problem?日托中心儿童牙刷的污染问题:如何解决这个问题?
Clin Oral Investig. 2014 Nov;18(8):1969-74. doi: 10.1007/s00784-013-1169-y. Epub 2013 Dec 24.