Dealing with research misconduct in the United Kingdom. An American perspective on research integrity.
作者信息
Rennie D
机构信息
Institute for Health Policy Studies, San Francisco, CA 94109, USA.
出版信息
BMJ. 1998 Jun 6;316(7146):1726-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7146.1726.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Dealing with research misconduct in the United Kingdom. An American perspective on research integrity.英国对科研不端行为的处理。关于科研诚信的美国视角。
BMJ. 1998 Jun 6;316(7146):1726-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7146.1726.
2
Scientific misconduct in US health service.美国医疗服务中的科研不端行为。
Lancet. 1995 May 27;345(8961):1359. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)92552-x.
3
The history and future of the Office of Research Integrity: Scientific Misconduct and Beyond.研究诚信办公室的历史与未来：科研不端行为及其他
Sci Eng Ethics. 1999 Apr;5(2):183-98. doi: 10.1007/s11948-999-0008-7.
4
Spring helps research integrity report resurface.斯普林格助力研究诚信报告再度出现。
JAMA. 1996 Mar 13;275(10):746.
5
Scientific misconduct: a form of white coat crime.科研不端行为：一种“白衣犯罪”形式。
J Pharm Law. 1993;2(1):15-34.
6
The fallout: what happens to whistleblowers and those accused but exonerated of scientific misconduct?后果：举报人以及那些被指控但被认定无科学不端行为的人会怎样？
Sci Eng Ethics. 1999 Apr;5(2):229-50. doi: 10.1007/s11948-999-0014-9.
7
Policing fraud and deceit: the legal aspects of misconduct in scientific inquiry.防范欺诈与欺骗：科学探究中不当行为的法律层面
J Infor Ethics. 1996 Spring;5(1):59-71.
8
Scientific misconduct. ORI report tracks gun-shy feds.科研不端行为。美国研究诚信办公室报告追踪胆小的联邦政府工作人员。
Science. 1999 May 7;284(5416):901. doi: 10.1126/science.284.5416.901.
9
Federal inquiry finds misconduct by a discoverer of the AIDS virus.联邦调查发现艾滋病病毒发现者存在不当行为。
N Y Times Web. 1992 Dec 31:A1, A20.
10
The American experience: lessons learned.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2000 Jan;6(1):95-107. doi: 10.1007/s11948-000-0028-9.
引用本文的文献
1
The visibility of scientific misconduct: A review of the literature on retracted journal articles.科学不端行为的可见性：对撤稿期刊文章相关文献的综述
Curr Sociol. 2017 Oct;65(6):814-845. doi: 10.1177/0011392116663807. Epub 2016 Oct 13.
2
The implications of fraud in medical and scientific research.医学和科学研究中的欺诈行为所带来的影响。
World J Surg. 2009 Nov;33(11):2355-9. doi: 10.1007/s00268-009-0201-5.
3
Managing allegations of research misconduct.处理关于研究不端行为的指控。
J R Soc Med. 2009 Apr;102(4):134-8. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2009.090037.
4
Falsified papers in high-impact journals were slow to retract and indistinguishable from nonfraudulent papers.高影响力期刊中的造假论文撤稿缓慢，且与非造假论文难以区分。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 May;61(5):464-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.019.
5
Dealing with editorial misconduct.处理编辑不当行为。
BMJ. 2004 Dec 4;329(7478):1301-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.329.7478.1301.
6
Confidentiality and the duties of care.保密性与注意义务。
J Med Ethics. 2003 Feb;29(1):36-40. doi: 10.1136/jme.29.1.36.
7
Ethics in exercise science research.运动科学研究中的伦理问题。
Sports Med. 2002;32(3):169-83. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200232030-00002.
本文引用的文献
1
Doctor admits research fraud.医生承认研究造假。
BMJ. 1998 Feb 28;316(7132):647.
2
The scientific misconduct process: a scientist's view from the inside.科研不端行为处理过程：一位科学家的亲历视角
JAMA. 1998 Jan 7;279(1):62-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.279.1.62.
3
Research misconduct.科研不端行为。
Gut. 1997 Jul;41(1):1-2. doi: 10.1136/gut.41.1.1.
4
Misconduct in research: editors respond.研究中的不当行为：编辑回应。
BMJ. 1997 Jul 26;315(7102):201-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7102.201.
5
Improving the scientific misconduct hearing process.改进科学不端行为听证程序。
JAMA. 1997;277(16):1315-9.
6
Fraud in medical research.医学研究中的欺诈行为。
J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1997 Jan-Feb;31(1):90-4.
7
Do we need a research police?我们需要一个研究监管机构吗？
J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1997 Jan-Feb;31(1):8-9.
8
The misconduct of redundant publication.重复发表行为不当。
Ann Rheum Dis. 1996 Nov;55(11):783-5. doi: 10.1136/ard.55.11.783.
9
International recruitment highlights need to track scientific behaviour.国际招聘凸显了追踪科研行为的必要性。
Nature. 1996 Sep 12;383(6596):107-8. doi: 10.1038/383107a0.
10
Dealing with deception.
Lancet. 1996 Mar 30;347(9005):843.
Zotero 插件