• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

法医毒理学进展

Advances in forensic toxicology.

作者信息

Peat M A

机构信息

LabOne, Inc., Lenexa, Kansas, USA.

出版信息

Clin Lab Med. 1998 Jun;18(2):263-78.

PMID:9614587
Abstract

Over the last 15 years there have been many changes in the practice of forensic toxicology. One of the most noteworthy has been the recognition of the need for good laboratory practices in the forensic toxicology laboratory. This has resulted in the development of an accreditation program for laboratories. Increasingly, forensic toxicologists are asked to interpret results in driving under the influence of drug cases. These interpretations are also difficult because of the lack of data correlating blood (or plasma) concentrations with impairment. The development of newer immunoassays and hyphenated mass spectrometric techniques now allow the forensic toxicologist to assay a large number of drugs (both traditional and products of the biotechnology revolution) with increasing sensitivity. This article focuses on these changes and some of the challenges facing the forensic toxicologists of the 21st century.

摘要

在过去的15年里,法医毒理学实践发生了许多变化。其中最值得注意的一点是,人们认识到法医毒理学实验室需要良好的实验室规范。这导致了实验室认可计划的制定。越来越多的法医毒理学家被要求在药物影响下驾驶案件中解释检测结果。由于缺乏将血液(或血浆)浓度与损伤相关联的数据,这些解释也很困难。更新的免疫分析和联用质谱技术的发展,现在使法医毒理学家能够以越来越高的灵敏度检测大量药物(包括传统药物和生物技术革命的产物)。本文重点关注这些变化以及21世纪法医毒理学家面临的一些挑战。

相似文献

1
Advances in forensic toxicology.法医毒理学进展
Clin Lab Med. 1998 Jun;18(2):263-78.
2
Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry in forensic toxicology.法医毒理学中的液相色谱-质谱联用技术
Mass Spectrom Rev. 2000 Jul-Aug;19(4):165-214. doi: 10.1002/1098-2787(200007)19:4<165::AID-MAS1>3.0.CO;2-Y.
3
[Continuous challenges in Japanese forensic toxicology practice: strategy to address specific goals].[日本法医毒理学实践中的持续挑战:实现特定目标的策略]
Nihon Hoigaku Zasshi. 2002 Sep;56(2-3):219-28.
4
Forensic toxicology. An overview and an algorithmic approach.
Am J Clin Pathol. 1989 Oct;92(4 Suppl 1):S48-55.
5
Forensic Toxicology Program: alcohol and drug testing in Wisconsin drivers.法医毒理学项目:威斯康星州驾驶员的酒精和药物检测
WMJ. 2003;102(6):79-83.
6
Recommendations for toxicological investigation of drug impaired driving.药物影响驾驶的毒理学调查建议。
J Forensic Sci. 2007 Sep;52(5):1214-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2007.00516.x. Epub 2007 Aug 3.
7
[The influence and use of drugs other than alcohol among drivers].
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1990 Mar 30;110(9):1103-5.
8
Minimal standards for the performance and interpretation of toxicology tests in legal proceedings.
J Forensic Sci. 1999 May;44(3):516-22.
9
[Judicial expertise in blood alcohol determination and toxicological analysis].
Ann Biol Clin (Paris). 2003 May-Jun;61(3):269-74.
10
Proficiency testing in forensic toxicology: a feasibility study.法医毒理学能力验证:一项可行性研究。
J Forensic Sci. 1983 Jan;28(1):139-58.