• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

促成有效社区健康促进联盟的因素:对北卡罗来纳州10个“协助计划”联盟的研究。美国癌症预防戒烟干预研究。

Factors that contribute to effective community health promotion coalitions: a study of 10 Project ASSIST coalitions in North Carolina. American Stop Smoking Intervention Study for Cancer Prevention.

作者信息

Kegler M C, Steckler A, McLeroy K, Malek S H

机构信息

Department of Health Promotion Sciences, College of Public Health, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center 73190, USA.

出版信息

Health Educ Behav. 1998 Jun;25(3):338-53. doi: 10.1177/109019819802500308.

DOI:10.1177/109019819802500308
PMID:9615243
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify factors that contribute to the effectiveness of community health promotion coalitions. Member survey data from 10 coalitions formed as part of North Carolina Project ASSIST were analyzed at the coalition level to identify factors related to member participation, member satisfaction, quality of the action plan, resource mobilization, and implementation. The results suggest that coalitions with good communication and skilled members had higher levels of member participation. Coalitions with skilled staff, skilled leadership, good communication, and more of a task focus had higher levels of member satisfaction. Coalitions with more staff time devoted to them and more complex structures had greater resource mobilization, and coalitions with more staff time, good communication, greater cohesion, and more complex structures had higher levels of implementation. Neither member participation nor member satisfaction correlated with the other measures of coalition effectiveness.

摘要

本研究的目的是确定有助于社区健康促进联盟有效性的因素。对作为北卡罗来纳州“协助项目”一部分而组建的10个联盟的成员调查数据在联盟层面进行了分析,以确定与成员参与、成员满意度、行动计划质量、资源调动和实施相关的因素。结果表明,沟通良好且成员技能娴熟的联盟成员参与度更高。拥有技能娴熟的工作人员、技能娴熟的领导、良好的沟通且更注重任务的联盟成员满意度更高。投入更多工作人员时间且结构更复杂的联盟资源调动能力更强,而投入更多工作人员时间、沟通良好、凝聚力更强且结构更复杂的联盟实施水平更高。成员参与度和成员满意度均与联盟有效性的其他衡量指标无关。

相似文献

1
Factors that contribute to effective community health promotion coalitions: a study of 10 Project ASSIST coalitions in North Carolina. American Stop Smoking Intervention Study for Cancer Prevention.促成有效社区健康促进联盟的因素:对北卡罗来纳州10个“协助计划”联盟的研究。美国癌症预防戒烟干预研究。
Health Educ Behav. 1998 Jun;25(3):338-53. doi: 10.1177/109019819802500308.
2
A multiple case study of implementation in 10 local Project ASSIST coalitions in North Carolina.对北卡罗来纳州10个地方的“援助计划”联盟实施情况的多案例研究。
Health Educ Res. 1998 Jun;13(2):225-38. doi: 10.1093/her/13.2.225.
3
Management and governance processes in community health coalitions: a procedural justice perspective.社区健康联盟中的管理与治理流程:程序正义视角
Health Educ Behav. 2002 Dec;29(6):737-54. doi: 10.1177/109019802237941.
4
The effects of leadership and governance processes on member participation in community health coalitions.领导与治理过程对社区卫生联盟成员参与度的影响。
Health Educ Behav. 2005 Aug;32(4):455-73. doi: 10.1177/1090198104271967.
5
Community coalitions for prevention and health promotion: factors predicting satisfaction, participation, and planning.预防与健康促进社区联盟:预测满意度、参与度和规划的因素
Health Educ Q. 1996 Feb;23(1):65-79. doi: 10.1177/109019819602300105.
6
Community health coalitions in context: associations between geographic context, member type and length of membership with coalition functions.背景下的社区健康联盟:地理背景、成员类型和成员资格时长与联盟功能之间的关联
Health Educ Res. 2014 Oct;29(5):715-29. doi: 10.1093/her/cyu028. Epub 2014 Jun 27.
7
A conceptual model for understanding effective coalitions involved in health promotion programming.一个用于理解参与健康促进规划的有效联盟的概念模型。
Public Health Nurs. 2006 Jan-Feb;23(1):67-73. doi: 10.1111/j.0737-1209.2006.230110.x.
8
New Perspective on Factors Related to Coalition Success: Novel Findings From an Investigation of Physical Activity Coalitions Across the United States.联盟成功相关因素的新视角:对美国各地体育活动联盟调查的新发现
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2015 Nov-Dec;21(6):E23-30. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000190.
9
An initial attempt at operationalizing and testing the Community Coalition Action Theory.社区联合行动理论的操作性定义和初步检验
Health Educ Behav. 2011 Jun;38(3):261-70. doi: 10.1177/1090198110372875. Epub 2011 Mar 10.
10
A practitioner's guide to successful coalitions.成功联盟从业者指南
Am J Community Psychol. 2001 Apr;29(2):173-91; discussion 205-11. doi: 10.1023/A:1010366310857.

引用本文的文献

1
Community Coalition Functioning, Collaborative Structure, and Coalition Models: Enhancing Support for Evidence-Based Practice Implementation.社区联盟运作、协作结构与联盟模式:加强对基于证据的实践实施的支持
Prev Sci. 2025 Apr;26(3):426-437. doi: 10.1007/s11121-025-01800-3. Epub 2025 Mar 24.
2
The Explo'Santé mixed methods protocol: an interventional research school health promotion project in France.“健康探索”混合方法方案:法国一项学校健康促进干预研究项目
Arch Public Health. 2025 Jan 29;83(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s13690-024-01487-y.
3
Supporting implementation of universal prevention initiatives in K-12 schools: impacts on fidelity through organizational readiness and team functioning in a cluster-randomized trial.
支持在幼儿园至12年级学校实施普遍预防举措:在一项整群随机试验中,通过组织准备情况和团队运作对实施保真度的影响
Implement Sci Commun. 2025 Jan 6;6(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s43058-024-00691-9.
4
Examining the creation of synergy in community coalitions for smoke-free environments in Armenia and Georgia.探讨亚美尼亚和格鲁吉亚无烟环境社区联盟协同效应的形成。
Health Promot Int. 2024 Jun 1;39(3). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daae058.
5
A scoping review of the globally available tools for assessing health research partnership outcomes and impacts.全球可用的评估健康研究伙伴关系成果和影响的工具的范围综述。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 Dec 22;21(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-00958-y.
6
Implementation of Community‑Wide Initiatives Designed to Reduce Teen Pregnancy: Measuring Progress in a 5‑Year Project in 10 Communities.旨在减少青少年怀孕的全社区倡议的实施:在10个社区的一项为期5年的项目中衡量进展情况。
Sex Res Social Policy. 2022;19(2):496-508. doi: 10.1007/s13178-021-00565-y.
7
Community coalitions for smoke-free environments in Armenia and Georgia: A mixed methods analysis of coalition formation, implementation and perceived effectiveness.亚美尼亚和格鲁吉亚的无烟环境社区联盟:对联盟形成、实施和感知有效性的混合方法分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 3;18(8):e0289149. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289149. eCollection 2023.
8
Improving primary health care through partnerships: Key insights from a cross-case analysis of multi-stakeholder partnerships in two Canadian provinces.通过伙伴关系改善初级卫生保健:对加拿大两个省份多利益相关方伙伴关系的跨案例分析得出的关键见解。
Health Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 5;4(4):e397. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.397. eCollection 2021 Dec.
9
Activating Partnership Assets to Produce Synergy in Primary Health Care: A Mixed Methods Study.激活伙伴关系资产以在初级卫生保健中产生协同效应:一项混合方法研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Aug 18;9(8):1060. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9081060.
10
Going the Distance: Technical Assistance to Community Prevention Coalitions and its impact on Prevention Coalitions Over Time.长远推进:对社区预防联盟的技术援助及其对预防联盟的长期影响
Consult Psychol J. 2021 Jun;73(2):181-198. doi: 10.1037/cpb0000180. Epub 2020 Nov 30.