Pincus A L, Newes S L, Dickinson K A, Ruiz M A
Department of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University, USA.
J Pers Assess. 1998 Feb;70(1):145-70. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa7001_10.
Structural Analysis of Social Behavior (SASB) is an increasingly popular model of interpersonal and intrapsychic interactions that provides a flexible assessment methodology ranging from an observer-based coding system to a modifiable objective self-report questionnaire: the Intrex. Published research using the Intrex has varied in the methods employed to assess the fundamental dimensions of affiliation and autonomy of SASB. In this article, we review the conceptual and computational differences among 3 indexes to assess the SASB dimensions. Empirical comparisons revealed good support for convergent validity but significant differences in distribution characteristics and orthogonality. These results have direct implications for assessment strategies, statistical analyses, and interpretation of both clinical assessments and clinical research. Results are discussed with reference to developing guidelines for assessment and research use of SASB via self-report.
社会行为结构分析（SASB）是一种越来越受欢迎的人际和心理内部互动模型，它提供了一种灵活的评估方法，范围从基于观察者的编码系统到可修改的客观自评问卷：Intrex。使用Intrex进行的已发表研究在用于评估SASB的归属和自主性基本维度的方法上各不相同。在本文中，我们回顾了用于评估SASB维度的3个指标之间的概念和计算差异。实证比较显示对收敛效度有良好支持，但在分布特征和正交性方面存在显著差异。这些结果对评估策略、统计分析以及临床评估和临床研究的解释都有直接影响。将参考制定通过自评进行SASB评估和研究使用的指南来讨论结果。
