Suppr超能文献

使用库尔特计数器进行电子血小板计数。校正因子的重新评估。

Electronic platelet counts with the Coulter counter. Reassessment of a correction factor.

作者信息

Gottfried E L, Wehman J, Wall B

出版信息

Am J Clin Pathol. 1976 Sep;66(3):506-11. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/66.3.506.

Abstract

Platelet counts are determined on the Coulter electronic counter by counting the diluted platelet-rich plasma obtained by sedimentation or centrifugation of whole blood. In calculating the whole-blood platelet count, an empirical correction factor for platelet-free plasma trapped by sedimented erythrocytes has been recommended, and a widely-distributed circular slide rule calculator incorporates the correction factor. In this study, visual and electronic platelet counts were compared in 100 specimens with counts ranging from 10 to 1,100 X 10(3) per mul and hematocrits ranging from 17.5 to 48.5%. Platelet-rich plasma samples prepared by a centrifugation method (Plateletfuge) gave machine counts in close agreement with those of samples prepared by sedimentation. Whole-blood platelet counts determined with the circular calculator were consistently lower than visual counts, with an average difference of -17%. The electronic counts were recalculated after elimination of the correction factor, and agreement then improved to an average difference of only +1.6%. The correction factor for trapped platelet-free plasma leads to erroneously low values and should not be used.

摘要

通过对全血进行沉降或离心获得的稀释富血小板血浆进行计数,在库尔特电子计数器上测定血小板计数。在计算全血血小板计数时,已推荐对沉降红细胞捕获的无血小板血浆采用经验校正因子,并且一种广泛使用的圆形计算尺计算器纳入了该校正因子。在本研究中,对100份标本的血小板进行了目视计数和电子计数比较,计数范围为每微升10至1100×10³,血细胞比容范围为17.5%至48.5%。通过离心法(血小板离心机)制备的富血小板血浆样本的机器计数与通过沉降法制备的样本计数非常一致。使用圆形计算器测定的全血血小板计数始终低于目视计数,平均差异为-17%。在消除校正因子后重新计算电子计数,然后一致性提高到平均差异仅为+1.6%。捕获的无血小板血浆的校正因子会导致错误的低值,不应使用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验