Soumerai S B
Harvard Medical School, USA.
Int J Psychiatry Med. 1998;28(1):81-96. doi: 10.2190/BTCA-Q06P-MGCQ-R0L5.
The purpose of this article is to discuss the principles of academic detailing, or educational outreach, in primary care and review the evidence of its effectiveness in, and potential for improving, mental health care.
The general educational research literature on improving physician performance was reviewed along with studies that were designed to test academic detailing. Four rigorous studies have tested this approach specifically on mental health care. These studies are reviewed in detail.
Measuring pre-intervention performance to target those with increased educational needs and identifying barriers to change are associated with substantially improved program effectiveness. To change strongly held beliefs or to overcome patient demands, person-to-person contact with credible experts who provide structured alternatives is necessary. Brief reinforcement visits increase success rates and targeting programs to physicians at greatest need improves the cost effectiveness of educational interventions.
Academic detailing is one of the few educational interventions that has consistently demonstrated improved physician performance. Educational outreach methods to improve mental health practices in primary care are in need of much additional research. Improving the detection of mental disorders and underuse of mental health treatment may prove to be more difficult than reducing the overuse of unnecessary medications.
本文旨在探讨基层医疗中学术推广(即教育拓展)的原则,并回顾其在改善心理健康护理方面的有效性证据及潜力。
回顾了关于提高医生绩效的一般教育研究文献以及旨在测试学术推广的研究。有四项严谨的研究专门针对心理健康护理测试了这种方法。对这些研究进行了详细回顾。
在干预前衡量绩效以针对教育需求增加的人群,并识别变革的障碍,这与大幅提高项目有效性相关。要改变根深蒂固的观念或克服患者的要求,与提供结构化替代方案的可信专家进行面对面接触是必要的。简短的强化访问可提高成功率,将项目针对最有需求的医生可提高教育干预的成本效益。
学术推广是少数几个始终证明能提高医生绩效的教育干预措施之一。改善基层医疗中心理健康实践的教育拓展方法需要更多研究。事实可能证明,改善精神障碍的诊断和心理健康治疗利用不足的情况比减少不必要药物的过度使用更为困难。