• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

八旬老人的颈动脉内膜切除术:早期结果与远期预后

Carotid endarterectomy in octogenarians: early results and late outcome.

作者信息

O'Hara P J, Hertzer N R, Mascha E J, Beven E G, Krajewski L P, Sullivan T M

机构信息

Department of Vascular Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Ohio 44195, USA.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 1998 May;27(5):860-9; discussion 870-1. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(98)70266-6.

DOI:10.1016/s0741-5214(98)70266-6
PMID:9620138
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study was undertaken to determine the safety and efficacy of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in the octogenarian population at the Cleveland Clinic.

METHODS

From 1989 to 1995, 182 CEAs were performed among 167 octogenarians (98 men, 69 women) with a mean age of 83 years (median, 83 years; range, 80 to 93 years). One hundred procedures (55%) were performed for severe asymptomatic stenosis, whereas 48 (26%) were performed for hemispheric transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) or amaurosis fugax, 24 (13%) for prior stroke, and 10 (5%) for vertebrobasilar symptoms. Thirteen CEAs (7%) were combined with myocardial revascularization, and another five (3%) represented carotid reoperations. Nine arteriotomies (5%) were closed primarily, whereas the remaining 173 (95%) were repaired using either vein patch angioplasty (141, 77%) or synthetic patches (32, 18%). Two patients were lost to follow-up, but late information was available for 165 patients (180 operations) at a mean interval of 2.7 years (median, 2.4 years; maximum, 7.4 years).

RESULTS

Considering all 182 procedures, there were five early (<30 days) postoperative neurologic events (2.7%), including three strokes (1.6%) and two TIAs (1.1%). An additional 15 neurologic events occurred during the late follow-up period, consisting of 11 strokes (6.1%) and four TIAs (2.2%). The Kaplan-Meier estimated 5-year rate of freedom from stroke was 85% (95% confidence interval [CI], 77% to 93%). There was one early postoperative death (0.6%) of cardiac complications 9 days after CEA. The estimated 5-year survival rate was 45% (95% CI, 33% to 57%), and the 5-year stroke-free survival rate was 42% (95% CI, 30% to 53%). Multivariable analysis yielded age at operation (p = 0.001), abnormal creatinine level (p = 0.025), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (p = 0.019) as variables that significantly influenced the survival rate. The presence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (p = 0.009) and, surprisingly, a lesser degree of contralateral internal carotid stenosis (p = 0.003) were found to be significantly associated with stroke after CEA. Causes of late death were cardiovascular in 16 patients (30%), unknown in 13 (24%), carcinoma in six (11%), stroke in six (11%), and miscellaneous in 13 (24%).

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that CEA may be safely performed in selected octogenarians with carotid stenosis, and that the majority of these patients live the rest of their lives free from stroke. Therefore, age alone should not exclude otherwise-qualified candidates from consideration for CEA.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定克利夫兰诊所老年人群中行颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)的安全性和有效性。

方法

1989年至1995年期间,对167名平均年龄83岁(中位数83岁;范围80至93岁)的老年人(98名男性,69名女性)实施了182例CEA手术。100例手术(55%)是针对严重无症状性狭窄进行的,而48例(26%)是针对半球性短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)或一过性黑矇进行的,24例(13%)是针对既往中风进行的,10例(5%)是针对椎基底动脉症状进行的。13例CEA手术(7%)与心肌血运重建联合进行,另外5例(3%)是颈动脉再次手术。9例动脉切开术(5%)进行了一期缝合,其余173例(95%)则采用静脉补片血管成形术(141例,77%)或合成补片(32例,18%)进行修复。2例患者失访,但有165例患者(180例手术)的后期信息,平均随访间隔为2.7年(中位数2.4年;最长7.4年)。

结果

在所有182例手术中,术后早期(<30天)发生了5例神经系统事件(2.7%),包括3例中风(1.6%)和2例TIA(1.1%)。在后期随访期间又发生了15例神经系统事件,包括11例中风(6.1%)和4例TIA(2.2%)。Kaplan-Meier法估计的5年无中风率为85%(95%置信区间[CI],77%至93%)。CEA术后9天有1例因心脏并发症导致的早期术后死亡(0.6%)。估计的5年生存率为45%(95%CI,33%至57%),5年无中风生存率为42%(95%CI,30%至53%)。多变量分析显示,手术时年龄(p = 0.001)、肌酐水平异常(p = 0.025)和慢性阻塞性肺疾病(p = 0.019)是显著影响生存率的变量。发现慢性阻塞性肺疾病的存在(p = 0.009)以及令人惊讶的对侧颈内动脉狭窄程度较轻(p = 0.003)与CEA术后中风显著相关。后期死亡原因中心血管疾病16例(30%),原因不明13例(24%),癌症6例(11%),中风6例(11%),其他13例(24%)。

结论

我们得出结论,在选定的有颈动脉狭窄的老年患者中可以安全地进行CEA手术,并且这些患者中的大多数在余生中无中风。因此,仅年龄不应将其他符合条件的患者排除在CEA手术的考虑之外。

相似文献

1
Carotid endarterectomy in octogenarians: early results and late outcome.八旬老人的颈动脉内膜切除术:早期结果与远期预后
J Vasc Surg. 1998 May;27(5):860-9; discussion 870-1. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(98)70266-6.
2
Reoperation for recurrent carotid stenosis: early results and late outcome in 199 patients.复发性颈动脉狭窄的再次手术:199例患者的早期结果和远期结局
J Vasc Surg. 2001 Jul;34(1):5-12. doi: 10.1067/mva.2001.115601.
3
A fifteen-year experience with carotid endarterectomy after a formal operative protocol requiring highly frequent patch angioplasty.一项为期15年的颈动脉内膜切除术经验,该手术遵循要求频繁进行补片血管成形术的正式手术方案。
J Vasc Surg. 2000 Apr;31(4):724-35. doi: 10.1067/mva.2000.104591.
4
Reoperations for carotid artery stenosis: role of primary and secondary reconstructions.颈动脉狭窄的再次手术:一期和二期重建的作用
J Vasc Surg. 2001 Mar;33(3):495-503. doi: 10.1067/mva.2001.111730.
5
Comparison of North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial and population-based outcomes for carotid endarterectomy.北美症状性颈动脉内膜切除术试验与基于人群的颈动脉内膜切除术结果比较。
J Vasc Surg. 1998 May;27(5):845-50; discussion 851. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(98)70264-2.
6
Perioperative risk and late outcome of nonelective carotid endarterectomy.非选择性颈动脉内膜切除术的围手术期风险和远期结局
J Vasc Surg. 1999 Oct;30(4):618-31. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(99)70101-1.
7
A personal experience with coronary artery bypass grafting, carotid patching, and other factors influencing the outcome of carotid endarterectomy.冠状动脉搭桥术、颈动脉修补术的个人经历以及影响颈动脉内膜切除术结果的其他因素。
J Vasc Surg. 2006 May;43(5):959-968. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.12.060.
8
Carotid endarterectomy outcome with vein or Dacron graft patch angioplasty and internal carotid artery shortening.采用静脉或涤纶补片血管成形术及颈内动脉缩短术的颈动脉内膜切除术的结果
J Vasc Surg. 1999 Apr;29(4):654-64. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(99)70311-3.
9
Carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosis in the very elderly.高龄患者无症状性颈动脉狭窄的颈动脉内膜切除术
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Feb;61(2):382-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.07.090. Epub 2014 Aug 28.
10
Redo carotid endarterectomy versus primary carotid endarterectomy.再次颈动脉内膜切除术与初次颈动脉内膜切除术对比
Stroke. 2001 Dec 1;32(12):2787-92. doi: 10.1161/hs1201.099649.

引用本文的文献

1
Postendarterectomy mortality in octogenarians and nonagenarians in the USA from 1993 to 1999.1993 年至 1999 年美国 80 岁及 80 岁以上人群血管成形术后的死亡率。
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2010 Jan;29(2):154-61. doi: 10.1159/000262312. Epub 2009 Dec 1.
2
Carotid angioplasty and stenting in the elderly.老年患者的颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术。
Neuroradiology. 2007 Nov;49(11):933-8. doi: 10.1007/s00234-007-0278-1. Epub 2007 Jul 27.
3
Endovascular treatment of patients with carotid stenosis.颈动脉狭窄患者的血管内治疗。
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2005 Feb;5(1):21-8. doi: 10.1007/s11910-005-0019-y.
4
[Vascular surgery in the elderly].[老年血管外科手术]
Chirurg. 2005 Feb;76(2):113-25. doi: 10.1007/s00104-004-0982-x.
5
Early and late results of carotid endarterectomy: retrospective study of 70 operations.颈动脉内膜切除术的早期和晚期结果:70例手术的回顾性研究
Sao Paulo Med J. 2001 Nov 1;119(6):206-11. doi: 10.1590/s1516-31802001000600005.
6
Carotid endarterectomy in the community hospital in patients age 80 and older.80岁及以上患者在社区医院进行的颈动脉内膜切除术。
Ann Surg. 2000 Jun;231(6):781-8. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200006000-00001.