• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年患者的颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术。

Carotid angioplasty and stenting in the elderly.

作者信息

Kadkhodayan Yasha, Cross Dewitte T, Derdeyn Colin P, Moran Christopher J

机构信息

Interventional Neuroradiology, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 510 South Kingshighway Blvd, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.

出版信息

Neuroradiology. 2007 Nov;49(11):933-8. doi: 10.1007/s00234-007-0278-1. Epub 2007 Jul 27.

DOI:10.1007/s00234-007-0278-1
PMID:17657482
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

To investigate the technical success rate as well as the procedural and mid-term complication rates of carotid angioplasty and stenting in elderly patients, a group excluded from large randomized endarterectomy trials given their perceived high surgical risk.

METHODS

Of 200 consecutive carotid angioplasty and/or stenting procedures performed between March 1996 and March 2005, 21 procedures were performed without cerebral protection devices in 20 patients over the age of 79 years (mean age: 83 years, 12 men, eight women). These patients' medical records were retrospectively reviewed for vascular imaging reports and available clinical follow-up. Procedural and mid-term complication rates were calculated and compared to a previously published cohort of 133 consecutive patients < or = 79 years of age who also underwent endovascular treatment at our institution.

RESULTS

Carotid stenosis was reduced from a mean of 82% to no significant stenosis in all procedures. The procedural stroke rate was zero of 21 procedures. The procedural transient ischemic attack rate (TIA) was one of 21 procedures (4.8%). Mean follow-up was 24.6 months (range: 1.0-79.5 months) with at least a 30-day follow-up for 20 of the 21 procedures (95.2%). There were no new strokes. There was one recurrent ipsilateral TIA at 1.9 months. In five cases with follow-up carotid ultrasonography, no hemodynamically significant restenosis had occurred. There were three myocardial infarctions (MI) occurring at 0.5, 2.1, and 15.2 months, of which the last MI was fatal. The composite 30-day stroke and death rate was zero of 21 procedures (95% confidence interval: 0-14%). No significant difference was found in the 30-day rate of stroke, TIA, MI, or death between the elderly and younger patients.

CONCLUSION

Carotid angioplasty and stenting in elderly patients can be performed successfully with acceptable procedural and mid-term complication rates comparable to younger patients.

摘要

引言

为了研究老年患者颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术的技术成功率以及手术中和中期并发症发生率,该老年患者群体因被认为手术风险高而被排除在大型随机内膜切除术试验之外。

方法

在1996年3月至2005年3月期间连续进行的200例颈动脉血管成形术和/或支架置入术中,20例79岁以上患者(平均年龄:83岁,12名男性,8名女性)的21例手术未使用脑保护装置。对这些患者的病历进行回顾性审查,以获取血管成像报告和可用的临床随访资料。计算手术中和中期并发症发生率,并与本院之前发表的133例年龄≤79岁且也接受血管内治疗的连续患者队列进行比较。

结果

所有手术中,颈动脉狭窄率从平均82%降至无明显狭窄。21例手术的手术期卒中率为零。21例手术中有1例发生手术期短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)(4.8%)。平均随访时间为24.6个月(范围:1.0 - 79.5个月),21例手术中有20例至少随访了30天(95.2%)。无新发卒中。1.9个月时出现1例同侧复发性TIA。5例接受随访颈动脉超声检查的患者未发生血流动力学上有意义的再狭窄。在0.5、2.1和15.2个月时发生了3例心肌梗死(MI),其中最后1例MI是致命的。21例手术的30天卒中与死亡率综合为零(95%置信区间:0 - 14%)。老年患者与年轻患者在30天卒中、TIA、MI或死亡率方面未发现显著差异。

结论

老年患者的颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术可以成功进行,其手术中和中期并发症发生率与年轻患者相当,是可以接受的。

相似文献

1
Carotid angioplasty and stenting in the elderly.老年患者的颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术。
Neuroradiology. 2007 Nov;49(11):933-8. doi: 10.1007/s00234-007-0278-1. Epub 2007 Jul 27.
2
Carotid angioplasty and stent placement for restenosis after endarterectomy.颈动脉血管成形术及支架置入术治疗内膜剥脱术后再狭窄
Neuroradiology. 2007 Apr;49(4):357-64. doi: 10.1007/s00234-006-0206-9. Epub 2007 Jan 17.
3
Carotid angioplasty and stenting is safe and effective for treatment of recurrent stenosis after eversion endarterectomy.颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术对于外翻式内膜切除术术后复发性狭窄的治疗是安全有效的。
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Sep;60(3):645-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.03.288. Epub 2014 May 1.
4
Combined carotid endarterectomy with transluminal angioplasty and primary stenting of the supra-aortic vessels.颈动脉内膜切除术联合经腔血管成形术及主动脉弓血管一期支架置入术。
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2000 Oct;41(5):737-42.
5
Carotid artery stenting for recurrent carotid artery restenosis after previous ipsilateral carotid artery endarterectomy or stenting: a report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.颈动脉支架置入术治疗同侧颈动脉内膜切除术或支架置入术后再发颈动脉狭窄:来自国家心血管数据注册中心的报告。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Feb;7(2):180-186. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.11.004.
6
Outcomes of angioplasty and stenting at the common carotid origin.颈总动脉起始处血管成形术和支架置入术的结果
Surg Neurol. 2009 Nov;72(5):451-5; discussion 455. doi: 10.1016/j.surneu.2009.05.017. Epub 2009 Aug 7.
7
Comparison of angioplasty and stenting with cerebral protection versus endarterectomy for treatment of internal carotid artery stenosis in elderly patients.血管成形术和带脑保护装置的支架置入术与内膜切除术治疗老年患者颈内动脉狭窄的比较。
J Vasc Surg. 2004 Nov;40(5):945-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2004.08.022.
8
Carotid artery stenting with cerebral protection in 100 consecutive patients: immediate and two-year follow-up results.100例连续患者行颈动脉支架置入术并给予脑保护:即刻及两年随访结果
Ital Heart J. 2003 Oct;4(10):695-700.
9
Results of carotid angioplasty and stenting are equivalent for critical versus high-grade lesions in patients deemed high risk for carotid endarterectomy.在被认为颈动脉内膜切除术高危的患者中,对于临界病变与重度狭窄病变,颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术的结果相当。
J Surg Res. 2013 Nov;185(1):21-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.07.027. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
10
Endarterectomy Versus Angioplasty in Patients with Symptomatic Severe Carotid Stenosis (EVA-3S) trial: results up to 4 years from a randomised, multicentre trial.症状性重度颈动脉狭窄患者内膜切除术与血管成形术对比研究(EVA-3S)试验:一项随机多中心试验的4年随访结果
Lancet Neurol. 2008 Oct;7(10):885-92. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70195-9. Epub 2008 Sep 5.

引用本文的文献

1
The cost-utility of CT angiography and conventional angiography for people presenting with intracerebral hemorrhage.CT血管造影和传统血管造影在脑出血患者中的成本效益分析。
PLoS One. 2014 May 13;9(5):e96496. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096496. eCollection 2014.
2
Future trials of endovascular mechanical recanalisation therapy in acute ischemic stroke patients - a position paper endorsed by ESMINT and ESNR : part II: methodology of future trials.未来急性缺血性脑卒中患者血管内机械再通治疗的临床试验 - 由 ESMINT 和 ESNR 认可的立场文件:第二部分:未来试验的方法学。
Neuroradiology. 2012 Dec;54(12):1303-12. doi: 10.1007/s00234-012-1076-y. Epub 2012 Sep 5.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Endarterectomy versus stenting in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis.有症状的重度颈动脉狭窄患者行内膜切除术与支架置入术的比较
N Engl J Med. 2006 Oct 19;355(16):1660-71. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa061752.
2
30 day results from the SPACE trial of stent-protected angioplasty versus carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients: a randomised non-inferiority trial.有症状患者支架置入术式血管成形术与颈动脉内膜切除术对比的SPACE试验30天结果:一项随机非劣效性试验
Lancet. 2006 Oct 7;368(9543):1239-47. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69122-8.
3
Protected carotid stenting in high-surgical-risk patients: the ARCHeR results.
Hyperperfusion syndrome after carotid stent angioplasty.
颈动脉支架血管成形术后的高灌注综合征
Neuroradiology. 2009 Mar;51(3):169-74. doi: 10.1007/s00234-008-0483-6. Epub 2008 Dec 23.
4
Differences in complication rates among the centres in the SPACE study.SPACE研究中各中心并发症发生率的差异。
Neuroradiology. 2008 Dec;50(12):1049-53. doi: 10.1007/s00234-008-0459-6. Epub 2008 Sep 23.
高手术风险患者的颈动脉支架置入术:ARCHeR研究结果
J Vasc Surg. 2006 Aug;44(2):258-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.03.044.
4
Procedure complications of carotid angioplasty and stent placement without cerebral protection devices.
Neurosurg Focus. 2005 Jan 15;18(1):e1. doi: 10.3171/foc.2005.18.1.2.
5
Carotid artery stenting is associated with increased complications in octogenarians: 30-day stroke and death rates in the CREST lead-in phase.颈动脉支架置入术与八旬老人并发症增加相关:CREST导入期的30天卒中及死亡率
J Vasc Surg. 2004 Dec;40(6):1106-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2004.10.022.
6
Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients.高危患者中颈动脉支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术的比较
N Engl J Med. 2004 Oct 7;351(15):1493-501. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040127.
7
Carotid endarterectomy in SAPPHIRE-eligible high-risk patients: implications for selecting patients for carotid angioplasty and stenting.蓝宝石(SAPPHIRE)研究入选标准中的高危患者行颈动脉内膜切除术:对选择颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术患者的启示
J Vasc Surg. 2004 May;39(5):958-65; discussion 965-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2003.12.037.
8
Carotid artery stenting in older patients: is age a risk factor for poor outcome?老年患者的颈动脉支架置入术:年龄是预后不良的危险因素吗?
J Endovasc Ther. 2002 Oct;9(5):559-65. doi: 10.1177/152660280200900501.
9
Immediate and late clinical outcomes of carotid artery stenting in patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis: a 5-year prospective analysis.有症状和无症状颈动脉狭窄患者行颈动脉支架置入术的近期和远期临床结局:一项5年前瞻性分析
Circulation. 2001 Jan 30;103(4):532-7. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.103.4.532.
10
Safety and efficacy of elective carotid artery stenting in high-risk patients.高危患者择期颈动脉支架置入术的安全性和有效性。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000 Jun;35(7):1721-8. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00618-5.