Bright P, Miller M R, Franklyn J A, Sheppard M C
Department of Medicine, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998 Jun;157(6 Pt 1):1885-91. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.157.6.9705022.
Goiter is a common condition and can cause upper airway obstruction (UAO), which may be difficult to detect. We have studied maximal expiratory and inspiratory flow volume loops using a neural network to see if this offers a better way to identify patients with UAO. The flow-volume loops from 155 patients with goiter were assessed by a human expert and sorted into those with and without UAO. The reliability of this assessment was judged by using two observers who repeated the sorting 8 wk apart. A set of 46 patients with loops suggesting UAO and a set of 51 patients with normal flow loops were taken from these 155, and the loops from a further 50 subjects with airflow limitation caused by chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were used for training and testing the neural network. Novel and standard indices were derived from the loops and used by the neural network. The kappa score for agreement between each of the observers and the original classification were 0.5 and 0.46, respectively, with the agreement between the observers at each reading of 0.58 and 0.68. The neural network found that a combination of four novel scores for flatness of the expiratory loop, the moment ratio, and the FEV1/PEF ratio was best at identifying UAO with a kappa score of 0.81, a sensitivity of 88%, specificity of 94% and an accuracy of 92%. We conclude that a neural network using only six indices taken from the expiratory limb of a flow-volume loop was better than human experts at identifying flow loops with UAO.
甲状腺肿是一种常见病症,可导致上呼吸道梗阻(UAO),而这种梗阻可能难以察觉。我们利用神经网络研究了最大呼气和吸气流量容积环,以探究这是否能提供一种更好的方法来识别患有UAO的患者。155名甲状腺肿患者的流量容积环由一名医学专家进行评估,并分为有UAO和无UAO两组。通过两名观察者重复进行分类,间隔8周,以此来判断该评估的可靠性。从这155名患者中选取了一组46名流量环提示有UAO的患者和一组51名流量环正常的患者,另外还使用了50名因慢性阻塞性肺疾病导致气流受限的受试者的流量环来训练和测试神经网络。从流量环中得出了新的和标准的指标,并供神经网络使用。每位观察者与原始分类之间的一致性kappa评分分别为0.5和0.46,每次读数时观察者之间的一致性为0.58和0.68。神经网络发现,呼气环平坦度、矩比和FEV1/PEF比这四个新评分的组合在识别UAO方面效果最佳,kappa评分为0.81,敏感性为88%,特异性为94%,准确性为92%。我们得出结论,仅使用从流量容积环呼气段获取的六个指标的神经网络在识别有UAO的流量环方面比医学专家更胜一筹。