Bharat V, Tripathy S, Guha A K, Mitra A
Department of Cardiology, Tata Main Hospital, Jamshedpur.
Indian Heart J. 1998 Mar-Apr;50(2):167-71.
Thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction has been proved to be most effective if given very early in the course of evolving infarction. This study was undertaken to optimise such treatment by overcoming the in-hospital delay in the existing set-up of an industrial hospital. A quality improvement project was undertaken to analyse the existing system of thrombolysing 46 consecutive patients of acute myocardial infarction treated in six months. By following the breakthrough sequence and proceeding in steps, the causes for delay in door to needle time were identified and rectified over two months. Impact of such measures in 32 patients of acute myocardial infarction thrombolysed consecutively in the next five months was studied. Door to needle time in the baseline group (n = 46) was in the range of 15-145 minutes and the average was 48.9 minutes. Only 32.6 percent of the patients in this group were thrombolysed within 30 minutes of arrival in the hospital. After the corrective measures were implemented in a study group of 32 patients, 27 with clear indication on admission were thrombolysed on the fast track i.e. with minimum delay. Five patients with doubtful need were put on the slow track and subsequently thrombolysed. Patients with no indication or a contra-indication for thrombolysis were excluded from this study. In the fast group, door to needle time reduced to an average of 22.56 minutes with a range of 7 to 67 minutes and 75 percent of the thrombolysed patients received the infusion within 30 minutes of arrival in the hospital. Differences in door to needle time between the two groups were statistically significant. Streamlining the hospital systems and procedures can help reduce the door to needle time in thrombolysing patients of acute myocardial infarction. This could be achieved within the existing resources by applying the principles of total quality improvement.
急性心肌梗死的溶栓治疗已被证明,如果在梗死进展过程中尽早进行,最为有效。本研究旨在通过克服一家工业医院现有体系中的院内延误,优化此类治疗。开展了一项质量改进项目,分析在六个月内接受治疗的46例急性心肌梗死患者的现有溶栓系统。按照突破序列逐步推进,确定了门到针时间延误的原因,并在两个月内进行了纠正。研究了在接下来五个月中连续接受溶栓治疗的32例急性心肌梗死患者采取此类措施的影响。基线组(n = 46)的门到针时间在15至145分钟之间,平均为48.9分钟。该组中只有32.6%的患者在入院后30分钟内接受了溶栓治疗。在对32例患者的研究组实施纠正措施后,27例入院时有明确指征的患者在快速通道接受了溶栓治疗,即延误最少。5例有疑问的患者被安排在慢通道,随后接受了溶栓治疗。无溶栓指征或有溶栓禁忌证的患者被排除在本研究之外。在快速组中,门到针时间平均缩短至22.56分钟,范围为7至67分钟,75%的溶栓患者在入院后30分钟内接受了输注。两组之间的门到针时间差异具有统计学意义。简化医院系统和程序有助于缩短急性心肌梗死溶栓患者的门到针时间。通过应用全面质量改进原则,可以在现有资源范围内实现这一目标。