• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

体外影响牙根物质去除的磁致伸缩超声洁牙机工作参数

Working parameters of a magnetostrictive ultrasonic scaler influencing root substance removal in vitro.

作者信息

Flemmig T F, Petersilka G J, Mehl A, Hickel R, Klaiber B

机构信息

Department of Periodontology, Julius Maximilian University, Würzburg, Germany.

出版信息

J Periodontol. 1998 May;69(5):547-53. doi: 10.1902/jop.1998.69.5.547.

DOI:10.1902/jop.1998.69.5.547
PMID:9623897
Abstract

This study assessed defect depth and volume resulting from root instrumentation using a magnetostrictive ultrasonic scaler with a slim scaling tip (P 12) in vitro. Combinations of the following working parameters were analyzed: lateral forces of 0.5 N, 1 N, and 2 N; tip angulations of 0 degrees, 45 degrees, and 90 degrees; power settings of low, medium, and high; and instrumentation time of 10, 20, 40, and 80 seconds. Defects were quantified using a 3-dimensional optical laser scanner. Lateral force had the greatest influence on defect volume compared to tip angulation and power setting (beta-weights 0.53+/-0.04, 0.17+/-0.04, and 0.19+/-0.04, respectively). Lateral force and tip angulation had similar effects on defect depth, but both effects were greater compared to power setting (beta-weights 0.43+/-0.04, 0.49+/-0.04, and 0.19+/-0.04, respectively). The various combinations of the assessed working parameters showed synergistic effects resulting in a wide range of defect depths (14.1+/-1.7 microm to 410.5+/-51.1 microm) and volumes (0.0084+/-0.0057 mm3 to 1.3+/-0.079 mm3). Severe root damage (defect depth >50 microm) at 40 seconds instrumentation time occurred under most combinations of lateral force, angulation, and power settings. The only exceptions were combinations of: 1) 0 degrees angulation, 0.5 N and 1 N lateral force at any power setting and 2) 45 degrees angulation, 0.5 N lateral force at low and medium power setting. The efficacy of the assessed magnetostrictive ultrasonic scaler may be adapted to the various clinical needs by adjusting the lateral force, tip angulation, and power setting.

摘要

本研究在体外评估了使用带有纤细洁治头(P 12)的磁致伸缩超声洁牙器进行根管预备后产生的缺损深度和体积。分析了以下工作参数的组合:0.5 N、1 N和2 N的侧向力;0度、45度和90度的洁治头角度;低、中、高功率设置;以及10、20、40和80秒的预备时间。使用三维光学激光扫描仪对缺损进行量化。与洁治头角度和功率设置相比,侧向力对缺损体积的影响最大(β权重分别为0.53±0.04、0.17±0.04和0.19±0.04)。侧向力和洁治头角度对缺损深度有相似的影响,但与功率设置相比,两者的影响都更大(β权重分别为0.43±0.04、0.49±0.04和0.19±0.04)。所评估的工作参数的各种组合显示出协同效应,导致了广泛的缺损深度(14.1±1.7微米至410.5±51.1微米)和体积(0.0084±0.0057立方毫米至1.3±0.079立方毫米)。在大多数侧向力、角度和功率设置的组合下,预备40秒时会出现严重的牙根损伤(缺损深度>50微米)。唯一的例外是以下组合:1)0度角度、任何功率设置下0.5 N和1 N的侧向力,以及2)45度角度、低功率和中功率设置下0.5 N的侧向力。通过调整侧向力、洁治头角度和功率设置,所评估的磁致伸缩超声洁牙器的功效可适应各种临床需求。

相似文献

1
Working parameters of a magnetostrictive ultrasonic scaler influencing root substance removal in vitro.体外影响牙根物质去除的磁致伸缩超声洁牙机工作参数
J Periodontol. 1998 May;69(5):547-53. doi: 10.1902/jop.1998.69.5.547.
2
The effect of working parameters on root substance removal using a piezoelectric ultrasonic scaler in vitro.工作参数对体外使用压电超声洁牙器去除牙根物质的影响。
J Clin Periodontol. 1998 Feb;25(2):158-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1998.tb02422.x.
3
Working parameters of a sonic scaler influencing root substance removal in vitro.体外影响牙根物质去除的声波洁牙机工作参数。
Clin Oral Investig. 1997 Jun;1(2):55-60. doi: 10.1007/s007840050011.
4
Significant influence of scaler tip design on root substance loss resulting from ultrasonic scaling: a laserprofilometric in vitro study.洁治器尖端设计对超声洁治导致的牙根物质丧失的显著影响:一项激光轮廓测量法体外研究
J Clin Periodontol. 2004 Nov;31(11):1003-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00601.x.
5
Influence of parameters on root surface roughness following treatment with a magnetostrictive ultrasonic scaler: an in vitro study.磁致伸缩超声洁牙机治疗后参数对牙根表面粗糙度的影响:一项体外研究。
J Periodontol. 2004 Sep;75(9):1221-6. doi: 10.1902/jop.2004.75.9.1221.
6
Influence of tip wear of piezoelectric ultrasonic scalers on root surface roughness at different working parameters. A profilometric and atomic force microscopy study.不同工作参数下的压电超声洁牙手机头磨损对根面粗糙度的影响:一种轮廓仪和原子力显微镜研究。
Int J Dent Hyg. 2013 Feb;11(1):69-74. doi: 10.1111/idh.12003. Epub 2012 Oct 4.
7
Ultrasonic scaler oscillations and tooth-surface defects.超声波洁牙器振荡与牙齿表面缺陷
J Dent Res. 2009 Mar;88(3):229-34. doi: 10.1177/0022034508330267.
8
Root surface defect produced by hand instruments and ultrasonic scaler with different power settings: an in vitro study.手工器械和不同功率设置的超声洁牙机所产生的牙根面缺损:一项体外研究。
Braz Dent J. 2009;20(1):58-63. doi: 10.1590/s0103-64402009000100010.
9
Root instrumentation. Power-driven versus manual scalers, which one?根管预备。电动器械与手动器械,该选哪一种?
Dent Clin North Am. 1998 Apr;42(2):229-44.
10
Safety and efficiency of novel sonic scaler tips in vitro.新型超声洁治器尖端在体外的安全性和效率
J Clin Periodontol. 2003 Jun;30(6):551-5. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2003.00300.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Differences Between Two Devices With Function of Periopolishing and Piezoelectric Scaler: A Randomized Clinical Trial.两种具有牙周抛光功能的器械与超声洁牙机的差异:一项随机临床试验
Int J Dent. 2025 Mar 4;2025:7131637. doi: 10.1155/ijod/7131637. eCollection 2025.
2
The working angle in low-abrasive air polishing has an influence on gingival damage-an ex vivo porcine model.低磨蚀性空气抛光的工作角度对牙龈损伤的影响——一项离体猪模型研究
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Oct;27(10):6199-6207. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05236-3. Epub 2023 Aug 29.
3
Effect of prophylactic instrumentation on surface roughness of tooth-colored restorative material: An study.
预防性器械操作对牙齿颜色修复材料表面粗糙度的影响:一项研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2021 May-Jun;24(3):231-235. doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_29_21. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
4
A 12-month randomized controlled trial evaluating erythritol air-polishing versus curette/ultrasonic debridement of mandibular furcations in supportive periodontal therapy.一项为期 12 个月的随机对照试验,评估了在下颌磨牙分叉区牙周支持治疗中,使用赤藓糖醇空气抛光与刮治/超声洁治的疗效。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Jan 21;21(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01397-3.
5
Evaluation of a systematic digitized training program on the effectivity of subgingival instrumentation with curettes and sonic scalers in vitro.评价一种系统的数字化培训计划对龈下刮治和超声器械在体外的有效性。
Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Jan;25(1):219-230. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03356-8. Epub 2020 May 30.
6
In Vitro Evaluation of Direct and Indirect Effects of Sonic and Ultrasonic Instrumentations on the Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets.超声和超声波器械对正畸托槽剪切粘结强度的直接和间接影响的体外评估
Turk J Orthod. 2020 Mar 1;33(1):37-42. doi: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.19067. eCollection 2020 Mar.
7
Comparison of Root Surface Wear and Roughness Resulted from Different Ultrasonic Scalers and Polishing Devices Applied on Human Teeth: An In-Vitro Study.不同超声洁牙器和抛光设备作用于人体牙齿导致的牙根表面磨损及粗糙度比较:一项体外研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Mar 7;8(1):55. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8010055.
8
The effect of miniaturized manual versus mechanical instruments on calculus removal and root surface characteristics: An in vitro light microscopic study.小型手动器械与机械器械对牙石清除及牙根表面特征的影响:一项体外光学显微镜研究。
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2019 Jul 15;5(5):519-527. doi: 10.1002/cre2.218. eCollection 2019 Oct.
9
Evaluation of the Effects of Er,Cr:YSGG Laser, Ultrasonic Scaler and Curette on Root Surface Profile Using Surface Analyser and Scanning Electron Microscope: An In Vitro Study.使用表面分析仪和扫描电子显微镜评估铒铬:钇钪镓石榴石激光、超声波洁治器和刮匙对牙根表面形态的影响:一项体外研究。
J Lasers Med Sci. 2016 Fall;7(4):243-249. doi: 10.15171/jlms.2016.43. Epub 2016 Oct 27.
10
Use of a continual sweep motion to compare air polishing devices, powders and exposure time on unexposed root cementum.使用连续扫动动作来比较空气抛光设备、粉末以及在未暴露的牙根牙骨质上的暴露时间。
Odontology. 2017 Jul;105(3):311-319. doi: 10.1007/s10266-016-0282-1. Epub 2017 Jan 9.