• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心理治疗关系中的隐私、保密与特权。

Privacy, confidentiality, and privilege in psychotherapeutic relationships.

作者信息

Smith-Bell M, Winslade W J

机构信息

Jim Perdue and Associates, Houston.

出版信息

Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1994 Apr;64(2):180-93. doi: 10.1037/h0079520.

DOI:10.1037/h0079520
PMID:8037228
Abstract

The dilemma faced by mental health professionals in guaranteeing clients' privacy and confidentiality while complying with the legitimate requests of third parties for confidential information is addressed. How that dilemma is played out in relation to child-abuse reporting laws is examined in terms of the legal and ethical aspects of privacy, confidentiality, and privilege in mental health practice.

摘要

文中探讨了心理健康专业人员在确保客户隐私和保密的同时,又要遵守第三方对机密信息的合法请求时所面临的困境。从心理健康实践中隐私、保密和特权的法律及伦理层面,审视了这一困境在与虐待儿童报告法相关方面是如何表现的。

相似文献

1
Privacy, confidentiality, and privilege in psychotherapeutic relationships.心理治疗关系中的隐私、保密与特权。
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1994 Apr;64(2):180-93. doi: 10.1037/h0079520.
2
It's been a privilege: advising patients of the Tarasoff duty and its legal consequences for the federal psychotherapist-patient privilege.这是一种荣幸:向患者告知塔萨夫义务及其对联邦心理治疗师-患者特权的法律后果。
Fordham Law Rev. 2009 Nov;78(2):863-931.
3
A confession of murder: the psychiatrist's dilemma.一份谋杀自白:精神科医生的两难处境。
Loyola Los Angel Law Rev. 1996 Jun;29(4):1691-8.
4
The evolving duty of mental health professionals to third parties: a doctrinal and institutional examination.心理健康专业人员对第三方不断演变的责任:教义与制度审视
Int J Law Psychiatry. 1994 Winter;17(1):1-42. doi: 10.1016/0160-2527(94)90036-1.
5
False memory syndrome and therapist liability to third parties for emotional distress injuries arising from recovered memory therapy: a general prohibition on liability and a limited liability exception.虚假记忆综合征以及治疗师因恢复记忆疗法导致的情绪困扰伤害对第三方承担的责任:责任的一般禁止和有限责任例外。
Spec Law Dig Health Care Law. 2002 Mar(275):9-41.
6
Attorney work product privilege trumps mandated child abuse reporting law: The case of Elijah W. v. Superior Court.律师工作成果特权优先于强制儿童虐待报告法:以伊利亚·W.诉高等法院案为例。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2015 Sep-Dec;42-43:43-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2015.08.006. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
7
Substance abuse and the duty to protect.
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1993;21(4):419-26.
8
Confidentiality after Tarasoff.塔萨夫案后的保密问题。
Health Soc Work. 1994 Aug;19(3):217-22. doi: 10.1093/hsw/19.3.217.
9
Child abuse: ethical and legal concerns for the nurse.
J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 1994 Dec;32(12):15-8. doi: 10.3928/0279-3695-19941201-09.
10
Psychotherapy and disclosure: recent court decisions.
Can J Psychiatry. 1998 Sep;43(7):731-6. doi: 10.1177/070674379804300708.

引用本文的文献

1
Defining the physician's duty to warn: consensus statement of Ontario's Medical Expert Panel on Duty to Inform.界定医生的警告义务:安大略省医疗告知义务专家小组的共识声明
CMAJ. 1998 Jun 2;158(11):1473-9.