• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

减少所报告的压疮发生率中的随机变异。

Reducing random variation in reported rates of pressure ulcer development.

作者信息

Berlowitz D R, Anderson J J, Ash A S, Brandeis G H, Brand H K, Moskowitz M A

机构信息

Center for Health Quality, Outcomes, and Economic Research, Bedford VA Hospital, MA 01730, USA.

出版信息

Med Care. 1998 Jun;36(6):818-25. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199806000-00005.

DOI:10.1097/00005650-199806000-00005
PMID:9630123
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The authors evaluated methods of reporting on rates of pressure ulcer development in long-term care to identify approaches that lead to more stable estimates of actual performance.

METHODS

Performance measures for facilities that adequately adjust for both random variation and casemix should be relatively stable from one time period to the next. The authors calculated facility rates of pressure ulcer development over eight consecutive time periods and correlated measures over time using different reporting methods including z-scores, combining rates from several time periods, and limiting analyses to large facilities. Results were compared with a Monte Carlo simulation.

RESULTS

Observed facility rates of pressure ulcer development varied considerably over time. The average correlation coefficient across seven time comparisons for observed rates was 0.17. Reporting performance as a z-score or limiting the analyses to large facilities increased the correlation. Combining two time periods was effective only when used with one of these other approaches. The correlation coefficient based on a simulation using only large facilities was 0.51.

CONCLUSIONS

Random variation affects reported rates of pressure ulcer development. Using only large facilities and combining two time periods limits the effects of random variation and results in more stable estimates of performance. When describing performance, management must consider tradeoffs between having more accurate data, the frequency with which data are provided, and whether it is given to all providers.

摘要

目的

作者评估了长期护理中压力性溃疡发生率的报告方法,以确定能得出更稳定的实际表现估计值的方法。

方法

对随机变异和病例组合均进行充分调整的机构绩效指标应在不同时间段内相对稳定。作者计算了连续八个时间段内机构压力性溃疡的发生率,并使用不同的报告方法(包括z分数、合并多个时间段的发生率以及将分析限于大型机构)对不同时间段的指标进行相关性分析。结果与蒙特卡洛模拟进行比较。

结果

观察到的机构压力性溃疡发生率随时间有很大差异。观察到的发生率在七次时间比较中的平均相关系数为0.17。将绩效报告为z分数或将分析限于大型机构可提高相关性。仅在与其他方法之一结合使用时,合并两个时间段才有效。仅使用大型机构进行模拟得出的相关系数为0.51。

结论

随机变异会影响报告的压力性溃疡发生率。仅使用大型机构并合并两个时间段可限制随机变异的影响,并得出更稳定的绩效估计值。在描述绩效时,管理层必须考虑在获得更准确的数据、数据提供频率以及是否向所有提供者提供数据之间进行权衡。

相似文献

1
Reducing random variation in reported rates of pressure ulcer development.减少所报告的压疮发生率中的随机变异。
Med Care. 1998 Jun;36(6):818-25. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199806000-00005.
2
Evaluating and improving pressure ulcer care: the VA experience with administrative data.
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1997 Aug;23(8):424-33. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30329-7.
3
Rating long-term care facilities on pressure ulcer development: importance of case-mix adjustment.对长期护理机构的压疮发生率进行评级:病例组合调整的重要性。
Ann Intern Med. 1996 Mar 15;124(6):557-63. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-124-6-199603150-00003.
4
Prevalence and incidence studies of pressure ulcers in two long-term care facilities in Canada.加拿大两家长期护理机构中压疮的患病率和发病率研究。
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2001 Nov;47(11):28-34.
5
Skin assessment and pressure ulcer care in hospital-based skilled nursing facilities.医院专业护理机构中的皮肤评估与压疮护理
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2003 Jun;49(6):42-4, 46, 48 passim, contd.
6
Health care reorganization and quality of care: unintended effects on pressure ulcer prevention.医疗保健重组与护理质量:对压疮预防的意外影响。
Med Care. 2001 Feb;39(2):138-46. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200102000-00004.
7
Geriatric syndromes as outcome measures of hospital care: can administrative data be used?老年综合征作为医院护理的结局指标:行政数据能否使用?
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1999 Jun;47(6):692-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1999.tb01591.x.
8
Facility-level outcome performance measures for nursing homes.养老院的机构层面成果绩效指标。
Gerontologist. 1998 Dec;38(6):665-83. doi: 10.1093/geront/38.6.665.
9
Does case mix matter for substance abuse treatment? A comparison of observed and case mix-adjusted readmission rates for inpatient substance abuse treatment in the Department of Veterans Affairs.病例组合对药物滥用治疗有影响吗?退伍军人事务部住院药物滥用治疗观察到的再入院率与病例组合调整后的再入院率比较。
Health Serv Res. 1997 Feb;31(6):755-71.
10
Variations in the outcomes of care provided in Pennsylvania nursing homes. Facility and environmental correlates.宾夕法尼亚州疗养院护理结果的差异。机构与环境相关因素。
Med Care. 1993 Jun;31(6):475-87. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199306000-00001.

引用本文的文献

1
Regulator Loss Functions and Hierarchical Modeling for Safety Decision Making.用于安全决策的调节器损失函数和层次建模
Med Decis Making. 2017 Jul;37(5):512-522. doi: 10.1177/0272989X16686767. Epub 2017 Jan 23.
2
The "Nursing Home Compare" measure of urinary/fecal incontinence: cross-sectional variation, stability over time, and the impact of case mix.“养老院比较”尿/便失禁测量指标:横断面变化、随时间的稳定性以及病例组合的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2010 Feb;45(1):79-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.01061.x. Epub 2009 Oct 29.