Orlebeke J F, Passchier J
Biol Psychol. 1976 Sep;4(3):173-84. doi: 10.1016/0301-0511(76)90002-8.
The effects of three variables (perceptual style 'leveling--sharpening', stimulus intensity and task) on tonic and phasic heart rate and skin conductance responses were studied. 24 levelers and 24 sharpeners received a series of 25 auditory stimuli under two instructions (task): in one task subject had to listen carefully to possible small differences between tones (intake task) and in the other task the subject had to count back silently and could neglect the tones (rejection task). One third of each group received tones of 50 dB, one third 75 dB and one third 100 dB. Results show that task has a strong effect on tonic responses in the direction predicted from Lacey's intake--rejection hypothesis. There is hardly any effect of task on phasic responses: only at the first trial heart rate tends to decelerate more in the intake than in the rejection task. Stimulus intensity does not influence tonic responses but very strongly affects phasic responses: deceleration to 50 and 75 dB, acceleration to 100 dB. GSR amplitude increases monotonically as a function of stimulus intensity. There is no difference between levelers and sharpeners with regard to tonic responses. Concerning phasic heart rate, sharpeners decelerate more than levelers and levelers have greater GSRs than sharpeners. It is suggested that tonic changes are relatively more under cognitive control, whereas phasic changes are more of a non-cognitive reflex-like nature. A relationship between the distinction arousal-activation as proposed by Pribram and McGuinness (1975) and the results of this experiment was suggested.
研究了三个变量(知觉风格“整平——锐化”、刺激强度和任务)对心脏静息和相位心率以及皮肤电传导反应的影响。24名整平者和24名锐化者在两种指令(任务)下接受了一系列25次听觉刺激:在一项任务中,受试者必须仔细聆听音调之间可能存在的细微差异(接受任务);在另一项任务中,受试者必须默默倒数,并且可以忽略音调(拒绝任务)。每组的三分之一接受50分贝的音调,三分之一接受75分贝的音调,三分之一接受100分贝的音调。结果表明,任务对静息反应有强烈影响,其方向符合莱西的接受——拒绝假设所预测的方向。任务对相位反应几乎没有影响:只有在第一次试验时,接受任务中心率的减速往往比拒绝任务中更多。刺激强度不影响静息反应,但对相位反应有非常强烈的影响:对50分贝和75分贝的音调减速,对100分贝的音调加速。皮肤电反应振幅随刺激强度单调增加。在静息反应方面,整平者和锐化者之间没有差异。关于相位心率,锐化者比整平者减速更多,而整平者的皮肤电反应比锐化者更大。有人认为,静息变化相对更多地受认知控制,而相位变化更具有非认知的反射性质。有人提出了普里布拉姆和麦吉尼斯(1975年)提出的唤醒——激活区分与本实验结果之间的关系。