Kuhlemeier K V, Yates P, Palmer J B
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins University, Good Samaritan Hospital of Maryland, Baltimore, USA.
Dysphagia. 1998 Summer;13(3):142-7. doi: 10.1007/PL00009564.
The objective of this study was to determine the inter- and intrarater reliability in evaluating videofluoroscopic swallowing studies (VFSS). Participants included 4 physicians (3 physiatrists and 1 internist) and 5 speech-language pathologists with at least 5 years experience in evaluating VFSS. The main outcomes of the study were reliability ratios of positive and negative tests in inter- and intrarater evaluations. Raters independently rated each of 20 VFSS on two separate occasions. Traits evaluated included oral stage impairment, aspiration, pharyngeal retention, and several functional components: timing of swallow onset, adequacy of velopharyngeal apposition, laryngeal elevation, epiglottic tilt, pharyngeal contraction, and pharyngoesophageal (PE) segment opening. Reliability varied widely depending on food type and the trait under evaluation. Inter- and intrarater reliability ratios did not differ widely. Reliability ratios values typically were highest (greater than 90%) for aspiration, especially with solid food, and lowest for the functional components. It was concluded that inter- and intrarater reliability in VFSS are adequate for evaluating oral stage, laryngeal penetration, and aspiration and pharyngeal retention, but questionable for functional components.
本研究的目的是确定在评估视频荧光吞咽造影检查(VFSS)时的评分者间和评分者内信度。参与者包括4名医生(3名物理治疗师和1名内科医生)以及5名在评估VFSS方面至少有5年经验的言语语言病理学家。该研究的主要结果是评分者间和评分者内评估中阳性和阴性测试的信度比。评分者在两个不同的场合独立对20份VFSS进行评分。评估的特征包括口腔期损伤、误吸、咽部残留以及几个功能成分:吞咽开始时间、腭咽闭合充分性、喉提升、会厌倾斜、咽部收缩以及咽食管(PE)段开放。信度因食物类型和所评估的特征而异。评分者间和评分者内的信度比差异不大。信度比值通常在误吸方面最高(大于90%),尤其是对于固体食物,而在功能成分方面最低。得出的结论是,VFSS中的评分者间和评分者内信度足以评估口腔期、喉穿透、误吸和咽部残留,但在功能成分方面存在疑问。