Suppr超能文献

受到州医学委员会纪律处分的医生。

Physicians disciplined by a state medical board.

作者信息

Morrison J, Wickersham P

机构信息

Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center Coatesville, PA 19320, USA.

出版信息

JAMA. 1998 Jun 17;279(23):1889-93. doi: 10.1001/jama.279.23.1889.

Abstract

CONTEXT

State medical boards discipline several thousand physicians each year. Although certain subgroups, such as those disciplined for malpractice, substance use, or sexual abuse, have been studied, little is known about disciplined physicians as a group.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the offenses, contributing factors, and type of discipline of a consecutive series of disciplined physicians.

DESIGN

Case-control study on publicly available data matching 375 disciplined physicians with 2 groups of control physicians, one matched solely by locale, and a second matched for sex, type of practice, and locale.

SUBJECTS

All disciplined physicians publicly reported by the Medical Board of California from October 1995 through April 1997.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Characteristics of disciplined physicians, offenses leading to discipline, and type of discipline.

RESULTS

A total of 375 physicians licensed by the Medical Board of California (approximately 0.24% per year) were disciplined for 465 offenses. The most frequent causes for discipline were negligence or incompetence (34%), abuse of alcohol or other drugs (14%), inappropriate prescribing practices (11%), inappropriate contact with patients (10%), and fraud (9%). Discipline imposed was revocation of medical license (21%), actual suspension of license (13%), stayed suspension of license (45%), and reprimand (21%). Type of offense was significantly associated with severity of discipline (P=.03). In logistic regression models comparing disciplined physicians with controls matched by locale, board discipline was significantly associated with physicians' sex (odds ratio [OR] for women, 0.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28-0.70) and involvement in direct patient care (OR, 2.56; 95% CI, 1.75-3.75). In the regression model with additional matching criteria, disciplinary action was negatively associated with specialty board certification (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.29-0.60) and positively associated with being in practice more than 20 years (OR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.39-2.92).

CONCLUSIONS

A small but substantial proportion of physicians is disciplined each year for a variety of offenses. Further study of disciplined physicians is necessary to identify physicians at high risk for offenses leading to disciplinary action and to develop effective interventions to prevent these offenses.

摘要

背景

各州的医学委员会每年都会对数千名医生进行纪律处分。尽管已经对某些亚组进行了研究,比如因医疗事故、药物滥用或性虐待而受到处分的医生,但对于受处分医生这一群体的了解却很少。

目的

评估一系列连续受处分医生的违规行为、促成因素及处分类型。

设计

一项基于公开数据的病例对照研究,将375名受处分医生与两组对照医生进行匹配,一组仅按地区匹配,另一组按性别、执业类型和地区进行匹配。

研究对象

加利福尼亚州医学委员会于1995年10月至1997年4月期间公开报告的所有受处分医生。

主要观察指标

受处分医生的特征、导致受处分的违规行为及处分类型。

结果

加利福尼亚州医学委员会共对375名持照医生(每年约0.24%)的465项违规行为进行了处分。受处分最常见的原因是疏忽或不胜任(34%)、酗酒或滥用其他药物(14%)、不适当的处方行为(11%)、与患者的不当接触(10%)以及欺诈(9%)。所实施的处分包括吊销行医执照(21%)、实际暂停执业(13%)、暂缓暂停执业(45%)和申斥(21%)。违规类型与处分的严重程度显著相关(P = 0.03)。在将受处分医生与按地区匹配的对照组进行比较的逻辑回归模型中,委员会的处分与医生的性别(女性的优势比[OR]为0.44;95%置信区间[CI],0.28 - 0.70)以及参与直接患者护理显著相关(OR,2.56;95% CI,1.75 - 3.75)。在具有额外匹配标准的回归模型中,纪律处分与专科委员会认证呈负相关(OR,0.42;95% CI,0.29 - 0.60),与执业超过20年呈正相关(OR,2.02;95% CI,1.39 - 2.92)。

结论

每年都有一小部分但数量可观的医生因各种违规行为受到处分。有必要对受处分医生进行进一步研究,以识别有导致纪律处分违规行为高风险的医生,并制定有效的干预措施来预防这些违规行为。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验