Sullivan M L
School of Criminal Justice, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ 07102, USA.
Dev Psychopathol. 1998 Spring;10(2):377-93. doi: 10.1017/s0954579498001655.
Qualitative methods are well suited to advance the understanding of the role of social context in the development of maladaptation and psychopathology. However, they have not been widely used by developmental psychopathologists, despite being utilized in related fields, particularly in the sociological study of crime and delinquency. This article assesses the potential for the increased use of qualitative methods in developmental psychopathology and addresses the challenges involved in integrating them with quantitative research strategies. The interplay of qualitative and quantitative methods in the study of juvenile delinquency is reviewed for relevant lessons about both the utility and the difficulties of integrating the two types of methods. The problem of assessing continuities and discontinuities over the life course in patterns of antisocial behavior is discussed as an example of the challenge of integrating methodological paradigms. Schools of thought about qualitative methods and their relationship to quantitative research paradigms are identified and compared. Examples are discussed of narrative life history interviewing and qualitative observational techniques and of recent research endeavors integrating these qualitative techniques with quantitative data analyses.
定性方法非常适合于增进对社会环境在适应不良和精神病理学发展中所起作用的理解。然而,尽管定性方法在相关领域,特别是在犯罪与青少年犯罪的社会学研究中得到了应用,但发展心理病理学家尚未广泛使用这些方法。本文评估了在发展心理病理学中更多使用定性方法的潜力,并探讨了将其与定量研究策略相结合所涉及的挑战。回顾了定性和定量方法在青少年犯罪研究中的相互作用,以获取有关整合这两种方法的效用和困难的相关经验教训。作为整合方法论范式挑战的一个例子,讨论了评估反社会行为模式在生命历程中的连续性和不连续性的问题。确定并比较了关于定性方法的思想流派及其与定量研究范式的关系。讨论了叙事生活史访谈和定性观察技术的例子,以及最近将这些定性技术与定量数据分析相结合的研究努力。