• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparison of antiemetic efficacy of granisetron and ondansetron in Oriental patients: a randomized crossover study.格拉司琼与昂丹司琼对东方患者的止吐疗效比较:一项随机交叉研究。
Br J Cancer. 1998 May;77(10):1683-5. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1998.277.
2
Comparable safety and antiemetic efficacy of a brief (30-second bolus) intravenous granisetron infusion and a standard (15-minute) intravenous ondansetron infusion in breast cancer patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.在接受中度致吐性化疗的乳腺癌患者中,短暂(30秒推注)静脉注射格拉司琼与标准(15分钟)静脉注射昂丹司琼的安全性和止吐疗效相当。
Cancer J Sci Am. 1998 Jan-Feb;4(1):52-8.
3
Comparative efficacy of three 5-HT3 antagonists (granisetron, ondansetron, and tropisetron) plus dexamethasone for the prevention of cisplatin-induced acute emesis: a randomized crossover study.三种5-羟色胺3拮抗剂(格拉司琼、昂丹司琼和托烷司琼)联合地塞米松预防顺铂所致急性呕吐的疗效比较:一项随机交叉研究。
Am J Clin Oncol. 2000 Apr;23(2):185-91. doi: 10.1097/00000421-200004000-00016.
4
Ondansetron versus granisetron in the prevention of chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.昂丹司琼与格拉司琼预防急性淋巴细胞白血病患儿化疗引起的恶心和呕吐的比较。
Mymensingh Med J. 2011 Oct;20(4):680-8.
5
[Granisetron (per os) compared with ondansetron (per os) in the prevention of nausea and vomiting induced by mildly emetogenic chemotherapies. Groupe de Recherches en Cancerologie du Nord].[格拉司琼(口服)与昂丹司琼(口服)预防轻度致吐性化疗引起的恶心和呕吐的比较。法国北部肿瘤研究小组]
Bull Cancer. 1998 Jun;85(6):562-8.
6
Antiemetic efficacy of three serotonin antagonists during high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation in malignant lymphoma.三种5-羟色胺拮抗剂在恶性淋巴瘤大剂量化疗及自体干细胞移植过程中的止吐疗效
Neoplasma. 2000;47(5):319-22.
7
Granisetron is equivalent to ondansetron for prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: results of a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.格拉司琼在预防化疗引起的恶心和呕吐方面与昂丹司琼等效:随机对照试验的荟萃分析结果。
Cancer. 2000 Dec 1;89(11):2301-8. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20001201)89:11<2301::aid-cncr19>3.0.co;2-6.
8
Prevention of delayed emesis by a single intravenous bolus dose of 5-HT3-receptor-antagonist in moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.在中度致吐性化疗中,单次静脉推注5-羟色胺3(5-HT3)受体拮抗剂预防迟发性呕吐。
J Chemother. 1996 Jun;8(3):237-42. doi: 10.1179/joc.1996.8.3.237.
9
Comparison of granisetron, ondansetron, and tropisetron in the prophylaxis of acute nausea and vomiting induced by cisplatin for the treatment of head and neck cancer: a randomized controlled trial.格拉司琼、昂丹司琼和托烷司琼预防顺铂治疗头颈癌引起的急性恶心和呕吐的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Cancer. 1996 Mar 1;77(5):941-8.
10
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of oral granisetron plus dexamethasone with intravenous ondansetron plus dexamethasone to control nausea and vomiting induced by moderate/severe emetogenic chemotherapy.口服格拉司琼加地塞米松与静脉注射昂丹司琼加地塞米松控制中/重度致吐性化疗引起的恶心和呕吐的疗效及安全性比较。
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei). 2000 Oct;63(10):729-36.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence and predictors of long-delayed (> 120 h) chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV)-a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis.长延迟(>120 小时)化疗引起的恶心和呕吐(CINV)的患病率和预测因素——系统评价和个体患者数据荟萃分析。
Support Care Cancer. 2023 Aug 3;31(8):505. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-07978-y.
2
Antiemetics for adults for prevention of nausea and vomiting caused by moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy: a network meta-analysis.成人止吐药预防中度或高度致吐性化疗引起的恶心和呕吐:网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 16;11(11):CD012775. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012775.pub2.
3
Baseline patient characteristics, incidence of CINV, and physician perception of CINV incidence following moderately and highly emetogenic chemotherapy in Asia Pacific countries.亚太国家中接受中度和高度致吐性化疗的患者基线特征、化疗引起的恶心和呕吐(CINV)发生率以及医生对CINV发生率的认知情况。
Support Care Cancer. 2015 Jan;23(1):263-72. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2373-2. Epub 2014 Aug 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of granisetron, ondansetron, and tropisetron in the prophylaxis of acute nausea and vomiting induced by cisplatin for the treatment of head and neck cancer: a randomized controlled trial.格拉司琼、昂丹司琼和托烷司琼预防顺铂治疗头颈癌引起的急性恶心和呕吐的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Cancer. 1996 Mar 1;77(5):941-8.
2
5-HT3 receptor antagonists in the prophylaxis of acute vomiting induced by moderately emetogenic chemotherapy--a randomised study.5-羟色胺3受体拮抗剂预防中度致吐性化疗引起的急性呕吐——一项随机研究
Eur J Cancer. 1993;29A(12):1669-72. doi: 10.1016/0959-8049(93)90101-k.
3
Ondansetron compared with granisetron in the prophylaxis of cisplatin-induced acute emesis: a multicentre double-blind, randomised, parallel-group study. The Ondansetron and Granisetron Emesis Study Group.昂丹司琼与格拉司琼预防顺铂所致急性呕吐的比较:一项多中心双盲、随机、平行组研究。昂丹司琼和格拉司琼呕吐研究组
Oncology. 1994 Jan-Feb;51(1):113-8. doi: 10.1159/000227321.
4
Ondansetron versus granisetron in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Results of a prospective randomized trial.
Cancer. 1994 Oct 1;74(7):1945-52. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19941001)74:7<1945::aid-cncr2820740720>3.0.co;2-c.
5
The polymorphic cytochrome P-4502D6 is involved in the metabolism of both 5-hydroxytryptamine antagonists, tropisetron and ondansetron.多态性细胞色素P-4502D6参与5-羟色胺拮抗剂托烷司琼和昂丹司琼的代谢。
Drug Metab Dispos. 1994 Mar-Apr;22(2):269-74.
6
5-HT3 receptor antagonists in the prophylaxis of acute vomiting induced by moderately emetogenic chemotherapy--a randomized study.5-羟色胺3受体拮抗剂预防中度致吐性化疗引起的急性呕吐——一项随机研究。
Eur J Cancer. 1994;30A(7):1041-2. doi: 10.1016/0959-8049(94)90152-x.
7
Genetic analysis of the Chinese cytochrome P4502D locus: characterization of variant CYP2D6 genes present in subjects with diminished capacity for debrisoquine hydroxylation.
Mol Pharmacol. 1994 Sep;46(3):452-9.
8
Characterisation of the cytochrome P450 enzymes involved in the in vitro metabolism of granisetron.参与格拉司琼体外代谢的细胞色素P450酶的表征
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1994 Dec;38(6):557-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1994.tb04397.x.
9
Comparative clinical trial of granisetron and ondansetron in the prophylaxis of cisplatin-induced emesis. The Granisetron Study Group.格拉司琼与昂丹司琼预防顺铂所致呕吐的比较临床试验。格拉司琼研究组。
J Clin Oncol. 1995 May;13(5):1242-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1995.13.5.1242.
10
Ondansetron compared with granisetron in the prophylaxis of cyclophosphamide-induced emesis in out-patients: a multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy, randomised, parallel-group study. Emesis Study Group for Ondansetron and Granisetron in Breast Cancer Patients.门诊患者中昂丹司琼与格拉司琼预防环磷酰胺所致呕吐的比较:一项多中心、双盲、双模拟、随机、平行组研究。乳腺癌患者昂丹司琼和格拉司琼呕吐研究组。
Oncology. 1995 May-Jun;52(3):202-10. doi: 10.1159/000227458.

格拉司琼与昂丹司琼对东方患者的止吐疗效比较:一项随机交叉研究。

Comparison of antiemetic efficacy of granisetron and ondansetron in Oriental patients: a randomized crossover study.

作者信息

Poon R T, Chow L W

机构信息

Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong.

出版信息

Br J Cancer. 1998 May;77(10):1683-5. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1998.277.

DOI:10.1038/bjc.1998.277
PMID:9635849
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2150069/
Abstract

A double-blind randomized crossover trial was performed to compare the antiemetic efficacy of two 5-HT3 receptor antagonists, granisetron and ondansetron, in Chinese patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil) for breast cancer. Twenty patients were randomized to receive chemotherapy with either granisetron on day 1 and ondansetron on day 8 of the first cycle followed by the reverse order in the second cycle, or vice versa. The number of vomiting episodes and the severity of nausea in the first 24 h (acute vomiting/nausea) and the following 7 days (delayed vomiting/nausea) were studied. Acute vomiting was completely prevented in 29 (72.5%) cycles with granisetron and 27 (67.5%) cycles with ondansetron, and treatment failure (>5 vomiting episodes) occurred in two (5%) cycles with each agent (P = NS). Acute nausea was completely controlled in 15 (37.5%) cycles with granisetron and 14 (35%) cycles with ondansetron, whereas severe acute nausea occurred in four (10%) cycles with each agent (P = NS). However, complete response for delayed vomiting was observed in only 21 (52.5%) cycles with granisetron and 22 (55%) cycles with ondansetron (P = NS), and delayed nausea was completely controlled in only 11 (27.5%) and ten (25%) cycles respectively (P = NS). In conclusion, both granisetron and ondansetron are effective in controlling acute nausea and vomiting in Chinese patients, with equivalent antiemetic efficacy. Control of delayed nausea and vomiting is less satisfactory.

摘要

进行了一项双盲随机交叉试验,比较两种5-羟色胺3(5-HT3)受体拮抗剂格拉司琼和昂丹司琼,对接受辅助化疗(环磷酰胺、甲氨蝶呤和5-氟尿嘧啶)的中国乳腺癌患者的止吐疗效。20名患者被随机分为两组,第一周期第1天接受格拉司琼化疗,第8天接受昂丹司琼化疗,第二周期顺序相反,反之亦然。研究了前24小时(急性呕吐/恶心)和接下来7天(延迟性呕吐/恶心)的呕吐发作次数和恶心严重程度。格拉司琼组29个周期(72.5%)和昂丹司琼组27个周期(67.5%)完全预防了急性呕吐,两种药物各有两个周期(5%)出现治疗失败(呕吐发作>5次)(P=无显著性差异)。格拉司琼组15个周期(37.5%)和昂丹司琼组14个周期(35%)完全控制了急性恶心,两种药物各有四个周期(10%)出现严重急性恶心(P=无显著性差异)。然而,格拉司琼组仅21个周期(52.5%)、昂丹司琼组仅22个周期(55%)观察到延迟性呕吐完全缓解(P=无显著性差异),延迟性恶心分别仅在11个周期(27.5%)和10个周期(25%)得到完全控制(P=无显著性差异)。总之,格拉司琼和昂丹司琼在控制中国患者急性恶心和呕吐方面均有效,止吐疗效相当。对延迟性恶心和呕吐的控制不太令人满意。