Suppr超能文献

格拉司琼与昂丹司琼对东方患者的止吐疗效比较:一项随机交叉研究。

Comparison of antiemetic efficacy of granisetron and ondansetron in Oriental patients: a randomized crossover study.

作者信息

Poon R T, Chow L W

机构信息

Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong.

出版信息

Br J Cancer. 1998 May;77(10):1683-5. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1998.277.

Abstract

A double-blind randomized crossover trial was performed to compare the antiemetic efficacy of two 5-HT3 receptor antagonists, granisetron and ondansetron, in Chinese patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil) for breast cancer. Twenty patients were randomized to receive chemotherapy with either granisetron on day 1 and ondansetron on day 8 of the first cycle followed by the reverse order in the second cycle, or vice versa. The number of vomiting episodes and the severity of nausea in the first 24 h (acute vomiting/nausea) and the following 7 days (delayed vomiting/nausea) were studied. Acute vomiting was completely prevented in 29 (72.5%) cycles with granisetron and 27 (67.5%) cycles with ondansetron, and treatment failure (>5 vomiting episodes) occurred in two (5%) cycles with each agent (P = NS). Acute nausea was completely controlled in 15 (37.5%) cycles with granisetron and 14 (35%) cycles with ondansetron, whereas severe acute nausea occurred in four (10%) cycles with each agent (P = NS). However, complete response for delayed vomiting was observed in only 21 (52.5%) cycles with granisetron and 22 (55%) cycles with ondansetron (P = NS), and delayed nausea was completely controlled in only 11 (27.5%) and ten (25%) cycles respectively (P = NS). In conclusion, both granisetron and ondansetron are effective in controlling acute nausea and vomiting in Chinese patients, with equivalent antiemetic efficacy. Control of delayed nausea and vomiting is less satisfactory.

摘要

进行了一项双盲随机交叉试验,比较两种5-羟色胺3(5-HT3)受体拮抗剂格拉司琼和昂丹司琼,对接受辅助化疗(环磷酰胺、甲氨蝶呤和5-氟尿嘧啶)的中国乳腺癌患者的止吐疗效。20名患者被随机分为两组,第一周期第1天接受格拉司琼化疗,第8天接受昂丹司琼化疗,第二周期顺序相反,反之亦然。研究了前24小时(急性呕吐/恶心)和接下来7天(延迟性呕吐/恶心)的呕吐发作次数和恶心严重程度。格拉司琼组29个周期(72.5%)和昂丹司琼组27个周期(67.5%)完全预防了急性呕吐,两种药物各有两个周期(5%)出现治疗失败(呕吐发作>5次)(P=无显著性差异)。格拉司琼组15个周期(37.5%)和昂丹司琼组14个周期(35%)完全控制了急性恶心,两种药物各有四个周期(10%)出现严重急性恶心(P=无显著性差异)。然而,格拉司琼组仅21个周期(52.5%)、昂丹司琼组仅22个周期(55%)观察到延迟性呕吐完全缓解(P=无显著性差异),延迟性恶心分别仅在11个周期(27.5%)和10个周期(25%)得到完全控制(P=无显著性差异)。总之,格拉司琼和昂丹司琼在控制中国患者急性恶心和呕吐方面均有效,止吐疗效相当。对延迟性恶心和呕吐的控制不太令人满意。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

4
Ondansetron versus granisetron in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Results of a prospective randomized trial.
Cancer. 1994 Oct 1;74(7):1945-52. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19941001)74:7<1945::aid-cncr2820740720>3.0.co;2-c.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验