• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

每日一次服用司帕沙星与高剂量阿莫西林治疗成人社区获得性疑似肺炎球菌肺炎的对照研究。司帕沙星欧洲研究小组

Once-daily sparfloxacin versus high-dosage amoxicillin in the treatment of community-acquired, suspected pneumococcal pneumonia in adults. Sparfloxacin European Study Group.

作者信息

Aubier M, Verster R, Regamey C, Geslin P, Vercken J B

机构信息

Hôpital Bichat, Service de Pneumologie, Paris, France.

出版信息

Clin Infect Dis. 1998 Jun;26(6):1312-20. doi: 10.1086/516366.

DOI:10.1086/516366
PMID:9636854
Abstract

The objective of this randomized, double-blind, multicenter study of 329 adult patients requiring hospitalization was to compare the safety and efficacy of sparfloxacin at a dosage of 200 mg once daily (following a 400-mg loading dose on day 1) with those of amoxicillin given as a 1-g oral dose three times daily for treatment of community-acquired pneumonia suspected to be due to Streptococcus pneumoniae. Success of treatment was determined by a combination of clinical assessment and chest radiography. Pneumococcal pneumonia was the confirmed diagnosis for 177 patients (54%). Overall rates of success among evaluable patients were equivalent between drugs, both at the end of treatment (sparfloxacin, 92%; amoxicillin, 87%) and at follow-up (sparfloxacin, 89%; amoxicillin, 84%). Sparfloxacin was well-tolerated and produced fewer gastrointestinal effects than amoxicillin. In conclusion, sparfloxacin is a safe and effective alternative to high-dose amoxicillin for the treatment of suspected pneumococcal community-acquired pneumonia.

摘要

这项针对329名需要住院治疗的成年患者的随机、双盲、多中心研究的目的是,比较每日一次服用200毫克司帕沙星(第1天给予400毫克负荷剂量后)与每日三次口服1克阿莫西林治疗疑似肺炎链球菌引起的社区获得性肺炎的安全性和有效性。治疗成功与否由临床评估和胸部X光检查共同判定。177名患者(54%)确诊为肺炎球菌肺炎。在可评估患者中,两种药物在治疗结束时(司帕沙星,92%;阿莫西林,87%)和随访时(司帕沙星,89%;阿莫西林,84%)的总体成功率相当。司帕沙星耐受性良好,胃肠道不良反应比阿莫西林少。总之,司帕沙星是治疗疑似肺炎球菌社区获得性肺炎的一种安全有效的替代高剂量阿莫西林的药物。

相似文献

1
Once-daily sparfloxacin versus high-dosage amoxicillin in the treatment of community-acquired, suspected pneumococcal pneumonia in adults. Sparfloxacin European Study Group.每日一次服用司帕沙星与高剂量阿莫西林治疗成人社区获得性疑似肺炎球菌肺炎的对照研究。司帕沙星欧洲研究小组
Clin Infect Dis. 1998 Jun;26(6):1312-20. doi: 10.1086/516366.
2
Comparative efficacy of sparfloxacin in comparison with amoxycillin plus ofloxacin in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia. French Study Group.司帕沙星与阿莫西林加氧氟沙星治疗社区获得性肺炎的疗效比较。法国研究小组。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1996 May;37 Suppl A:83-91. doi: 10.1093/jac/37.suppl_a.83.
3
Trovafloxacin versus high-dose amoxicillin (1 g three times daily) in the treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia.曲伐沙星与大剂量阿莫西林(每日三次,每次1g)治疗社区获得性细菌性肺炎的比较
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1998 Jun;17(6):447-53. doi: 10.1007/BF01691581.
4
Sparfloxacin for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia: a pooled data analysis of two studies.司帕沙星治疗社区获得性肺炎:两项研究的汇总数据分析
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1996 May;37 Suppl A:73-82. doi: 10.1093/jac/37.suppl_a.73.
5
Oral moxifloxacin vs high-dosage amoxicillin in the treatment of mild-to-moderate, community-acquired, suspected pneumococcal pneumonia in adults.口服莫西沙星与高剂量阿莫西林治疗成人轻至中度社区获得性疑似肺炎球菌肺炎的疗效比较
Chest. 2001 Jan;119(1):185-95. doi: 10.1378/chest.119.1.185.
6
Randomized, double-blind, comparative study of grepafloxacin and amoxycillin in the treatment of patients with community-acquired pneumonia.格帕沙星与阿莫西林治疗社区获得性肺炎患者的随机、双盲、对照研究
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1997 Dec;40 Suppl A:73-81. doi: 10.1093/jac/40.suppl_1.73.
7
Treatment of community-acquired pneumonia: a randomized comparison of sparfloxacin, amoxycillin-clavulanic acid and erythromycin.社区获得性肺炎的治疗:司帕沙星、阿莫西林-克拉维酸和红霉素的随机对照比较
Eur Respir J. 1995 Dec;8(12):1999-2007. doi: 10.1183/09031936.95.08121999.
8
Gemifloxacin once daily for 7 days compared to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid thrice daily for 10 days for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia of suspected pneumococcal origin.将吉米沙星每日一次服用7天与阿莫西林/克拉维酸每日三次服用10天用于治疗疑似肺炎球菌源性社区获得性肺炎进行比较。
Respir Med. 2004 Aug;98(8):708-20. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2004.04.007.
9
Sparfloxacin versus cefaclor in the treatment of patients with community-acquired pneumonia: a randomized, double-masked, comparative, multicenter study.司帕沙星与头孢克洛治疗社区获得性肺炎患者的随机、双盲、对照、多中心研究
Clin Ther. 1997 Sep-Oct;19(5):936-53. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(97)80047-1.
10
Sparfloxacin versus clarithromycin in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia.司帕沙星与克拉霉素治疗社区获得性肺炎的对比研究
Clin Ther. 1999 Jan;21(1):103-17. doi: 10.1016/S0149-2918(00)88271-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of Empiric Antibiotic Coverage in Community-Acquired Pneumonia Associated with Each Atypical Bacteria: A Meta-Analysis.经验性抗生素覆盖对每种非典型细菌所致社区获得性肺炎的疗效:一项荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2021 Sep 23;10(19):4321. doi: 10.3390/jcm10194321.
2
Diagnosis and Treatment of Adults with Community-acquired Pneumonia. An Official Clinical Practice Guideline of the American Thoracic Society and Infectious Diseases Society of America.成人社区获得性肺炎诊断和治疗。美国胸科学会和美国传染病学会的官方临床实践指南。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019 Oct 1;200(7):e45-e67. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201908-1581ST.
3
Efficacy of high doses of penicillin versus amoxicillin in the treatment of uncomplicated community acquired pneumonia in adults. A non-inferiority controlled clinical trial.
大剂量青霉素与阿莫西林治疗成人社区获得性单纯性肺炎的疗效。一项非劣效性对照临床试验。
Aten Primaria. 2019 Jan;51(1):32-39. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2017.08.003. Epub 2017 Oct 20.
4
A prospective study of inpatients to determine microbial etiology and therapeutic outcome of antibiotics for community-acquired pneumonia in pakistan.一项针对住院患者的前瞻性研究,旨在确定巴基斯坦获得性肺炎抗生素的微生物病因和治疗结果。
Bioimpacts. 2013;3(2):91-5. doi: 10.5681/bi.2013.023. Epub 2013 Jun 23.
5
Efficacy of high doses of oral penicillin versus amoxicillin in the treatment of adults with non-severe pneumonia attended in the community: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.高剂量口服青霉素与阿莫西林治疗社区就诊的非重症成人肺炎的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
BMC Fam Pract. 2013 Apr 17;14:50. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-14-50.
6
Empiric antibiotic coverage of atypical pathogens for community-acquired pneumonia in hospitalized adults.住院成人社区获得性肺炎非典型病原体的经验性抗生素覆盖。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Sep 12;2012(9):CD004418. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004418.pub4.
7
The new fluoroquinolones: A critical review.新型氟喹诺酮类药物:批判性综述。
Can J Infect Dis. 1999 May;10(3):207-38. doi: 10.1155/1999/378394.
8
Position paper: recommended design features of future clinical trials of antibacterial agents for community-acquired pneumonia.立场文件:社区获得性肺炎抗菌药物未来临床试验的推荐设计特点
Clin Infect Dis. 2008 Dec 1;47 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S249-65.
9
Effectiveness of beta lactam antibiotics compared with antibiotics active against atypical pathogens in non-severe community acquired pneumonia: meta-analysis.β-内酰胺类抗生素与抗非典型病原体活性抗生素治疗非重症社区获得性肺炎的疗效比较:荟萃分析
BMJ. 2005 Feb 26;330(7489):456. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38334.591586.82. Epub 2005 Jan 31.
10
Full-course oral levofloxacin for treatment of hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia.全疗程口服左氧氟沙星治疗社区获得性肺炎住院患者
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2004 Feb;23(2):82-8. doi: 10.1007/s10096-003-1060-x. Epub 2004 Jan 15.