Culling J F, Summerfield A Q, Marshall D H
MRC Institute of Hearing Research, University of Nottingham, United Kingdom.
J Acoust Soc Am. 1998 Jun;103(6):3509-26. doi: 10.1121/1.423059.
The two most salient dichotic pitches, the Huggins pitch (HP) and the binaural edge pitch (BEP), are produced by applying interaural phase transitions of 360 and 180 degrees, respectively, to a broadband noise. This paper examines accounts of these pitches, concentrating on a "central activity pattern" (CAP) model and a "modified equalization-cancellation" (mE-C) model. The CAP model proposes that a dichotic pitch is heard at frequency f when an individual across-frequency scan in an interaural cross-correlation matrix contains a sharp peak at f. The mE-C model proposes that a dichotic pitch is heard when a plot of interaural decorrelation against frequency contains a peak at f. The predictions of the models diverge for the BEP at very narrow transition bandwidths: the mE-C model predicts that salience is sustained, while the CAP model predicts that salience declines and that the dominant percept is of the in-phase segment of the noise. Experiment 1 showed that the salience of the BEP was sustained at the narrowest bandwidths that could be generated (0.5% of the transition frequency). Experiment 2 confirmed that the pitch of a BEP produced by a 0.5% transition bandwidth was close to the frequency of the transition band. Experiment 3 showed that pairs of simultaneous narrow 180-degree transitions, whose frequencies corresponded to vowel formants, were perceived as the intended vowels. Moreover, the same vowels were perceived whether the in-phase portion of the noise lay between the two transition frequencies or on either side of them. In contrast, different patterns of identification responses were made to diotic band-pass and band-stop noises whose cutoff frequencies corresponded to the same formants. Thus, the vowel-identification responses made to the dichotic stimuli were not based on hearing the in-phase portions of the noise as formants. These results are not predicted by the CAP model but are consistent with the mE-C model. It is argued that the mE-C model provides a more coherent and parsimonious account of many aspects of the HP and the BEP than do alternative models.
两种最显著的双耳音调,即哈金斯音调(HP)和双耳边缘音调(BEP),分别通过对宽带噪声施加360度和180度的耳间相位转换来产生。本文研究了对这些音调的解释,重点关注“中心活动模式”(CAP)模型和“修正的均衡-抵消”(mE-C)模型。CAP模型提出,当耳间互相关矩阵中的跨频率扫描在频率f处包含一个尖锐峰值时,在频率f处会听到一个双耳音调。mE-C模型提出,当耳间去相关与频率的关系图在频率f处包含一个峰值时,会听到一个双耳音调。在非常窄的转换带宽下针对BEP,这两个模型的预测出现分歧:mE-C模型预测显著度得以维持,而CAP模型预测显著度下降且主要感知为噪声的同相部分。实验1表明,在能够产生的最窄带宽(转换频率的0.5%)下,BEP的显著度得以维持。实验2证实,由0.5%转换带宽产生的BEP的音调接近转换带的频率。实验3表明,频率对应于元音共振峰的一对同时出现的窄180度转换被感知为预期的元音。此外,无论噪声的同相部分位于两个转换频率之间还是它们的两侧,都能感知到相同的元音。相比之下,对于截止频率对应于相同共振峰的双耳带通和带阻噪声,做出了不同的识别反应模式。因此,对双耳刺激做出的元音识别反应并非基于将噪声的同相部分听成共振峰。这些结果不是CAP模型所预测的,但与mE-C模型一致。有人认为,与其他模型相比,mE-C模型对HP和BEP的许多方面提供了更连贯和简洁的解释。