Suppr超能文献

电视辅助胸腔镜手术清创术与开胸手术治疗局限性肺炎后脓胸的比较

VATS debridement versus thoracotomy in the treatment of loculated postpneumonia empyema.

作者信息

Angelillo Mackinlay T A, Lyons G A, Chimondeguy D J, Piedras M A, Angaramo G, Emery J

机构信息

Division of Thoracic Surgery, British Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 1996 Jun;61(6):1626-30. doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(96)00194-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are approximately 60,000 new cases of postpneumonic empyema every day in the United States. Usually the fibrinopurulent stage of this complication has been treated by either tube thoracostomy or thoracotomy and debridement. According to the literature, thoracoscopic treatment has not been used often for this disease.

METHODS

Sixty-four cases of postpneumonic fibrinopurulent empyema were operated on at our institution: 33 cases (group I) by means of a formal thoracotomy and 31 cases (group II) by thoracoscopy. In the thoracoscopic subset the data were collected prospectively since 1992. These results were compared with those of a historical series treated by thoracotomy between 1985 and 1991. Both populations were similar in terms of age (mean, 49 years), number of cases (33/31), sex (2.1 male/female), and comorbid status.

RESULTS

Mean preoperative length of the medical management (11.5 versus 17 days) (p = 0.03) and chest tube removal (4.3 versus 6.1 days) were shorter in group II than in group I (p = 0.02). Morbidity and mortality were identical: one death and five complications in each group. Mean operative time was similar in both groups, and hospital stay was shorter in the video-assisted thoracic surgery group (6.8 versus 11.2 days) (p = not significant). Three patients from group II needed utilitary thoracotomies for debridement completeness (10% conversion rate).

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that video-assisted thoracic surgical treatment has the same rate of success as open thoracotomy but offers substantial advantages over thoracotomy in terms of resolution of the disease, hospital stay, and cosmesis. A prospective and randomized study is needed to confirm the findings of this nonrandomized initial experience.

摘要

背景

在美国,每天约有60000例肺炎后脓胸新发病例。通常,这种并发症的纤维脓性阶段通过胸腔闭式引流术或开胸手术及清创术进行治疗。据文献报道,胸腔镜治疗这种疾病并不常用。

方法

我们机构对64例肺炎后纤维脓性脓胸患者进行了手术:33例(第一组)采用正规开胸手术,31例(第二组)采用胸腔镜手术。在胸腔镜手术组中,自1992年起前瞻性收集数据。将这些结果与1985年至1991年间接受开胸手术治疗的历史系列结果进行比较。两组患者在年龄(平均49岁)、病例数(33/31)、性别(男/女为2.1)和合并症状态方面相似。

结果

第二组患者术前平均治疗时间(11.5天对17天)(p = 0.03)和胸腔引流管拔除时间(4.3天对6.1天)均短于第一组(p = 0.02)。两组的发病率和死亡率相同:每组均有1例死亡和5例并发症。两组的平均手术时间相似,电视辅助胸腔手术组的住院时间较短(6.8天对11.2天)(p值无统计学意义)。第二组有3例患者需要进行辅助开胸手术以确保清创彻底(转换率为10%)。

结论

我们得出结论,电视辅助胸腔手术治疗与开胸手术成功率相同,但在疾病解决、住院时间和美容方面比开胸手术具有显著优势。需要进行前瞻性随机研究以证实这一非随机初步经验的结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验