Jedrychowski W, Flak E
Collegium Medicum, Jagiellonian University, Cracow, Poland.
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 1998;11(1):19-35.
The purpose of the study was (a) to assess whether the respiratory effects of outdoor air pollutants may be replicated after correcting for indoor air quality (environmental tobacco smoke, home heating and damp or mold houses), (b) to evaluate whether the extent of the allergic status of children modifies the respiratory health due to air pollution, and (c) to determine whether the higher prevalence of respiratory symptoms in more polluted areas of the city may be explained by excess in allergy. The survey targeted 1,129 school children, nine years of age, attending schools in Cracow, located in the areas with different levels of the outdoor air pollution. Based on the measurements obtained from the air pollution monitoring stations and the information provided by parents on the sources of local emission of air pollutants, four categories of air pollution areas have been defined. Chronic phlegm as a single symptom was unrelated to allergy but associated with the outdoor air pollution score. The prevalence odds ratio (OR) for this symptom between the contrasting areas of outdoor air pollution, i.e. very high pollution versus very low, was 5.85 (95% CI: 1.05-32.6). Except for chronic phlegm, the outdoor air pollution score was associated only with hay fever when adjusted for indoor characteristics and allergy. After adjustment for air pollution and allergy, the presence of molds or dampness in the house was significantly related to hay fever (OR = 2.1, 95% CI: 1.5-3.0), wheezing (OR = 1.6, 95% CI: 1.1-2.5), and difficulty in breathing (OR = 2.0, 95% CI: 1.2-3.3). In terms of attributable fraction (AF(pop)), the effect of outdoor air pollution on the occurrence of allergy in children was significant (AF(pop) = 22.3%). The impact of allergy on the occurrence of respiratory symptoms (two or more respiratory symptoms) was stronger (AF(pop) = 52.1%) than that of the outdoor air pollution level (AF(pop) = 21.6%) or that of molds/dampness at home (AF(pop) = 14.1%).
(a)评估在校正室内空气质量(环境烟草烟雾、家庭供暖以及潮湿或发霉的房屋)后,室外空气污染物的呼吸效应是否可以重现;(b)评估儿童过敏状态的程度是否会因空气污染而改变呼吸健康状况;(c)确定城市污染更严重地区呼吸道症状较高的患病率是否可以用过敏过度来解释。该调查针对1129名9岁学童,他们就读于克拉科夫不同室外空气污染水平地区的学校。根据从空气污染监测站获得的测量数据以及家长提供的关于当地空气污染物排放源的信息,定义了四类空气污染区域。慢性咳痰作为单一症状与过敏无关,但与室外空气污染评分相关。在室外空气污染对比区域,即污染非常严重与污染非常轻微的区域之间,该症状的患病率比值比(OR)为5.85(95%置信区间:1.05 - 32.6)。除慢性咳痰外,在校正室内特征和过敏因素后,室外空气污染评分仅与花粉症相关。在校正空气污染和过敏因素后,房屋中霉菌或潮湿的存在与花粉症(OR = 2.1,95%置信区间:1.5 - 3.0)、喘息(OR = 1.6,95%置信区间:1.1 - 2.5)以及呼吸困难(OR = 2.0,95%置信区间:1.2 - 3.3)显著相关。就归因分数(AF(pop))而言,室外空气污染对儿童过敏发生的影响显著(AF(pop) = 22.3%)。过敏对呼吸道症状(两种或更多呼吸道症状)发生的影响(AF(pop) = 52.1%)比对室外空气污染水平(AF(pop) = 21.6%)或家中霉菌/潮湿的影响(AF(pop) = 14.1%)更强。