Elwood M, McNoe B, Smith T, Bandaranayake M, Doyle T C
Hugh Adam Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin.
N Z Med J. 1998 May 22;111(1066):180-3.
To assess the reasons why many women who have been screened once in a breast screening programme decline an invitation for further screening.
Telephone interview survey of a sample of such women; for questions relating to their experience of previous mammography, comparison to data on a representative sample of first screen attendees. The subjects were women who had attended the first round of the Otago-Southland breast cancer screening programme in 1991-1994, who were eligible for re-screening but had been rescreened; age range 50-62.
From programme records, 86% of women who were eligible for a second screen accepted it. Of the women not recorded as having had a second screen, some had attended for a second screen; some had not been invited until they had become age ineligible and some had received no invitation for re-screening. Of women who had received and declined an invitation for re-screening (n = 81), the major reason (46%) was their previous mammogram being painful. Other factors contributing were illness in themselves or their spouse, practical difficulties arranging time and negative experiences with staff in the previous mammography, although these related to relatively few women. A few women thought mammography would be of no benefit, and a few thought re-screening was unnecessary because their first mammography had been normal, or because they practise self-examination.
Ensuring that all women eligible for further screening do get invited could substantially increase the re-screening rate. Even women who have declined previous invitations should be offered further invitations, as a substantial proportion with to be screened. Flexible and convenient appointment times are the main modifiable logistic issue. The major factor influencing non-participation with further screening is a painful experience of mammography. Innovative approaches, either to reduce the pain or to reduce the impact of the pain on the woman's attitude to re-screening, should be trialed.
评估在乳腺癌筛查项目中接受过一次筛查的许多女性拒绝进一步筛查邀请的原因。
对这类女性样本进行电话访谈调查;对于与她们之前乳房X光检查经历相关的问题,与首次筛查参与者的代表性样本数据进行比较。研究对象为1991年至1994年参加奥塔哥 - 南地乳腺癌筛查项目第一轮筛查、有资格再次筛查但未接受再次筛查的女性;年龄范围在50至62岁。
根据项目记录,有资格接受第二次筛查的女性中,86%接受了筛查。在未记录为接受第二次筛查的女性中,一些人参加了第二次筛查;一些人直到年龄不符合要求才收到邀请,还有一些人未收到再次筛查的邀请。在收到并拒绝再次筛查邀请的女性(n = 81)中,主要原因(46%)是她们之前的乳房X光检查很痛苦。其他影响因素包括自身或配偶生病、安排时间存在实际困难以及之前乳房X光检查时与工作人员有负面经历,不过涉及这些因素的女性相对较少。少数女性认为乳房X光检查没有益处,还有少数女性认为再次筛查不必要,因为她们的首次乳房X光检查结果正常,或者因为她们进行自我检查。
确保所有有资格接受进一步筛查的女性都收到邀请,可大幅提高再次筛查率。即使是之前拒绝邀请的女性也应再次收到邀请,因为有很大一部分人愿意接受筛查。灵活便捷的预约时间是主要可调整的后勤问题。影响不参与进一步筛查的主要因素是乳房X光检查带来的痛苦经历。应尝试创新方法,要么减轻痛苦,要么减少痛苦对女性再次筛查态度的影响。