1 Clinical and Population Health Research Program, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts.
2 Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts.
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2019 Jun;28(6):820-826. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2018.6992. Epub 2019 Jan 9.
In the United States, older women (aged ≥65 years) continue to receive routine screening mammography surveillance, despite limited evidence supporting the benefits to this subpopulation. This article reviews screening mammography guidelines and the potential harms of such screening for older women in the United States. Published guidelines and recommendations on screening mammography for older women from professional medical societies and organizations in the United States were reviewed from the mid-20th century to present. Observational data were then synthesized to present the documented harms from screening mammography among older women. In 1976, the American Cancer Society recommended to screen all women aged ≥40 years with no upper age limit. With time, other major U.S. medical societies adopted their own screening guidelines without a consensus on age of screening cessation. A population-wide screening effort has largely continued without an upper age limit and with it, a growing body of literature on the harms of screening older women. Reported harms from screening mammography procedures have included physical pain, psychological distress, excessive use of health services from overdiagnoses/false positives, and undue financial expenses. These costs are particularly pronounced among special populations with limited life expectancies such as those of very advanced age ≥80 years, long-term nursing home residents, and the cognitively impaired. When potential harms, remaining life years, and the viability of available treatments are considered, the burdens of screening mammography often outweigh the benefits for older women. For some cases, an individualized approach to recommendations would be appropriate. National guidelines should be updated to provide clear guidance for screening women of advanced age, especially those in special populations with limited life expectancies.
在美国,尽管针对该亚人群的获益证据有限,老年女性(年龄≥65 岁)仍持续接受常规筛查性乳房 X 线摄影监测。本文回顾了美国为老年女性制定的筛查性乳房 X 线摄影指南和此类筛查的潜在危害。从 20 世纪中叶至今,我们对美国专业医学协会和组织发布的关于老年女性筛查性乳房 X 线摄影的指南和建议进行了审查。然后综合观察性数据,呈现出老年女性接受筛查性乳房 X 线摄影的已证实危害。1976 年,美国癌症协会建议对所有年龄≥40 岁的女性进行筛查,且不设年龄上限。随着时间的推移,美国其他主要医学协会也制定了自己的筛查指南,但对于停止筛查的年龄却没有达成共识。一项全人群筛查工作在很大程度上仍在继续,没有年龄上限,同时也产生了大量关于筛查老年女性危害的文献。筛查性乳房 X 线摄影程序带来的危害包括身体疼痛、心理困扰、因过度诊断/假阳性而过度使用医疗服务,以及不必要的经济费用。这些成本在预期寿命有限的特殊人群中尤为明显,如年龄非常大(≥80 岁)、长期居住在养老院的人群和认知受损的人群。当考虑到潜在危害、剩余寿命和可用治疗方法的可行性时,筛查性乳房 X 线摄影对老年女性的益处往往小于其危害。对于某些情况,采用个体化方法来制定建议可能是合适的。国家指南应进行更新,为年龄较大的女性,特别是预期寿命有限的特殊人群提供筛查的明确指导。