Suppr超能文献

接受球周麻醉或球后Tenon囊下麻醉的白内障超声乳化手术患者的疼痛、眼球运动及术前镇静情况比较

Comparison of pain, motility, and preoperative sedation in cataract phacoemulsification patients receiving peribulbar or sub-Tenon's anesthesia.

作者信息

Kollarits C R, Jaweed S, Kollarits F J

机构信息

Eye Institute of Northwestern Ohio, USA.

出版信息

Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 1998 Jun;29(6):462-5.

PMID:9640566
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The authors hoped to reduce the need for preoperative sedation and intravenous pain medication during cataract surgery by converting from peribulbar anesthesia to sub-Tenon's anesthesia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A consecutive series of 2453 cataract patients' charts were reviewed. Each patient had previously watched a videotape explaining the anesthetic method to be used. Requests for preoperative sedation were compared between patients who received peribulbar or sub-Tenon's anesthesia. A sample of 200 charts of nonsedated patients were reviewed to compare intraoperative pain and motility.

RESULTS

Intraoperative freedom from pain was reported by 91% of the peribulbar patients and 99% of the sub-Tenon's patients. Preoperative sedation was reduced from 26% of the peribulbar patients to 6.7% of the sub-Tenon's patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Sub-Tenon's anesthesia provided excellent intraoperative pain relief and reduced the need for preoperative sedation, making it a satisfactory anesthetic technique for patients undergoing cataract phacoemulsification in an ambulatory surgery facility.

摘要

背景与目的

作者希望通过将球周麻醉转换为球后Tenon囊下麻醉,减少白内障手术期间术前镇静和静脉注射止痛药物的需求。

患者与方法

回顾了连续2453例白内障患者的病历。每位患者此前都观看了一盘解释所用麻醉方法的录像带。比较接受球周麻醉或球后Tenon囊下麻醉患者的术前镇静需求。对200例未接受镇静患者的病历样本进行回顾,以比较术中疼痛和眼球活动情况。

结果

91%的球周麻醉患者和99%的球后Tenon囊下麻醉患者报告术中无痛。术前镇静从球周麻醉患者的26%降至球后Tenon囊下麻醉患者的6.7%。

结论

球后Tenon囊下麻醉提供了出色的术中疼痛缓解效果,并减少了术前镇静的需求,使其成为门诊手术设施中接受白内障超声乳化手术患者的一种令人满意的麻醉技术。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验