Budd J M, Brown J P R, Thomas J, Hardwick M, McDonald P, Barber K
Department of Anaesthesia, Worcestershire Royal Hospital, Worcester WR51DD, UK.
Anaesthesia. 2009 Jan;64(1):19-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05659.x.
The aim of this study was to compare efficacy and particularly patient preference of sub-Tenon's anaesthesia with peribulbar anaesthesia in patients undergoing sequential, bilateral, cataract surgery. Fifty patients were randomised to either sub-Tenon's or peribulbar anaesthesia for their first operation and the alternative technique for their subsequent operation. Intra-ocular pressure was measured, globe and lid akinesia were scored, patients completed a visual rating score of injection and operative pain and their preference for anaesthesia was assessed. Intra-ocular pressure rose significantly following peribulbar injection (p = 0.02) but was comparable at 5 min. There was no significant difference in lid or globe movement. Injection and operative pain scores were low and comparable. Both methods provided similar anaesthesia and akinesia. The majority (86%) chose the method they received first irrespective of whether it was sub-Tenon's or peribulbar, but 10% of patients preferred sub-Tenon's, disliking the facial numbness from peribulbar anaesthesia.
本研究旨在比较在接受连续双侧白内障手术的患者中,球后麻醉与球周麻醉的效果,尤其是患者的偏好。50例患者在首次手术时被随机分为接受球周麻醉或球后麻醉,并在随后的手术中采用另一种技术。测量眼压,对眼球和眼睑运动不能进行评分,患者完成注射和手术疼痛的视觉评分,并评估他们对麻醉的偏好。球周注射后眼压显著升高(p = 0.02),但在5分钟时眼压相当。眼睑或眼球运动无显著差异。注射和手术疼痛评分较低且相当。两种方法提供的麻醉和运动不能效果相似。大多数患者(86%)选择他们首次接受的麻醉方法,无论该方法是球周麻醉还是球后麻醉,但10%的患者更喜欢球后麻醉,不喜欢球周麻醉导致的面部麻木感。