Lam S K, Devine P L
WHO Collaborating Centre for Arbovirus Reference and Research (Dengue and Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever), Department of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Clin Diagn Virol. 1998 May 1;10(1):75-81. doi: 10.1016/s0928-0197(98)00002-6.
Rapid diagnosis of dengue infection is essential to patient management and disease control. The development of a rapid (5 min) immunochromatographic test and a 2 h commercial capture enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for anti-dengue IgM and IgG antibodies may lead to more rapid and accurate testing in peripheral health settings and diagnostic laboratories.
Evaluate two new commercial tests for dengue serology (Dengue Rapid test and Dengue Duo ELISA; PanBio, Brisbane, Australia).
The sensitivity and specificity of the tests were compared with in-house dengue IgM ELISA and hemagglutination-inhibition (HAI) assays using known positive and negative dengue specimens, as well as specimens from non-dengue cases.
Both assays showed excellent sensitivity in the diagnosis of both primary and secondary dengue infection (100%). In both assays, IgG levels showed excellent correlation with the hemagglutination-inhibition (HAI) assay, and these could be used to distinguish between primary and secondary dengue infections (92 and 97% of patients correctly classified in the rapid test and Duo ELISA, respectively). Specificity in both assays was 89% when sera from patients, with no apparent dengue infection, typhoid, leptospirosis and malaria, were tested.
These tests should be a useful aid in confirming the clinical diagnosis of dengue infection. The rapid test will be particularly valuable in peripheral health settings, while the ELISA has a place in central testing laboratories.
登革热感染的快速诊断对于患者管理和疾病控制至关重要。开发一种快速(5分钟)免疫层析试验以及一种用于检测抗登革热IgM和IgG抗体的2小时商用捕获酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA),可能会在外围医疗机构和诊断实验室实现更快速、准确的检测。
评估两种用于登革热血清学检测的新型商用检测方法(登革热快速检测法和登革热双联ELISA法;澳大利亚布里斯班的PanBio公司)。
使用已知的登革热阳性和阴性标本以及非登革热病例的标本,将这些检测方法的灵敏度和特异性与内部登革热IgM ELISA和血凝抑制(HAI)试验进行比较。
两种检测方法在诊断原发性和继发性登革热感染方面均显示出出色的灵敏度(100%)。在两种检测方法中,IgG水平与血凝抑制(HAI)试验显示出良好的相关性,并且可用于区分原发性和继发性登革热感染(快速检测法和双联ELISA法分别正确分类了92%和97%的患者)。当检测无明显登革热感染、伤寒、钩端螺旋体病和疟疾患者的血清时,两种检测方法的特异性均为89%。
这些检测方法应有助于确认登革热感染的临床诊断。快速检测法在外围医疗机构中将特别有价值,而ELISA法在中心检测实验室也有一席之地。