Heiman J R, Schloredt K A
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, USA.
Int J Impot Res. 1998 May;10 Suppl 2:S134-7; discussion S138-9.
The ethical and cultural issues accompanying sex research methods are rarely discussed. The present remarks briefly examine three previously described ethical principles--respect for people, beneficence and justice--as they might relate to sexual dysfunction assessment in clinical trials. Given the fact that sexuality is a social behavior and the outcome measures are reliant on some form of self report, there are specific pressures on investigators to conduct research assessment that respects ethical principles and cultural values. Examples with respect to screening criteria and participant selection are discussed. Recommendations include: (a) excluding participants with selected sexual and non-sexual diagnoses, psychosocial behaviors and habits; (b) including proportional ethnic groups as well as non-heterosexual participants; and (c) considering the couple, rather than just an individual, as study subjects who each require medical and psychosocial screening, assessment, and informed consent.
伴随性研究方法出现的伦理和文化问题鲜有讨论。本文简要探讨先前描述的三项伦理原则——尊重人、行善和公正——在临床试验中性功能评估方面的可能关联。鉴于性是一种社会行为且结果测量依赖某种形式的自我报告,研究人员在进行尊重伦理原则和文化价值观的研究评估时面临特定压力。文中讨论了筛选标准和参与者选择方面的例子。建议包括:(a)排除患有特定性和非性诊断、心理社会行为及习惯的参与者;(b)纳入成比例的不同种族群体以及非异性恋参与者;(c)将夫妻而非仅个人视为研究对象,夫妻双方都需要进行医学和心理社会筛查、评估并获得知情同意。