Rosen R C
UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Department of Psychiatry, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.
Int J Impot Res. 1998 May;10 Suppl 2:S59-63; discussion S77-9.
Sexual arousal in the male involves a complex interaction of physiological and subjective processes. In recent years, a number of physiological and self-report methods have been described for assessing sexual function in healthy and dysfunctional males. Physiological methods include the Rigiscan, volumetric and circumferential plethysmography, and the erectiometer. Despite their widespread use, each of these approaches has significant limitations in assessing male sexual function. Recent self-report measures include the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), Brief Male Sexual Function Inventory (BMSFI), and Center for Marital and Sexual Health Questionnaire (CMSH-SFQ). A structured interview for sexual function assessment has also been described (Derogatis Interview for Sexual Functioning--DISF-SR), in addition to daily diary and event log methods. The relative strengths and weaknesses of each of these approaches are reviewed.
男性的性唤起涉及生理和主观过程的复杂相互作用。近年来,已经描述了多种生理和自我报告方法来评估健康男性和性功能障碍男性的性功能。生理方法包括阴茎硬度测试仪、容积和周长体积描记法以及勃起测量仪。尽管这些方法被广泛使用,但每种方法在评估男性性功能方面都有显著局限性。最近的自我报告测量方法包括国际勃起功能指数(IIEF)、简短男性性功能量表(BMSFI)和婚姻与性健康中心问卷(CMSH-SFQ)。除了日常日记和事件记录方法外,还描述了一种用于性功能评估的结构化访谈(性功能障碍访谈——DISF-SR)。本文对这些方法各自的相对优缺点进行了综述。